Impact of an educational program on bilateral heart catheterization practice patterns.

The value and necessity of performing right heart catheterizations for coronary artery disease have been increasingly questioned. Preliminary analyses of the procedure among Medicare and Medicaid patients in New York State revealed significant inter-hospital variations in the frequencies with which such catheterizations were performed. These data suggested that right heart catheterizations (RHC) were being performed routinely. Medicare and Medicaid claims data for bilateral catheterizations were analyzed before and after an educational intervention program involving the state's 53 catheterization laboratories. The educational intervention was multifaceted and consisted of disseminating suggested guidelines established with the assistance of the New York State Chapter of the American College of Cardiology, the Committee on Cardiovascular Disease of the Medical Society of the State of New York, and the Cardiac Advisory Council of the New York State Department of Health. Posteducational intervention assessments were made over a 4-year period. The baseline data for 1992 demonstrated that 10 (18.4%) laboratories had performed RHC routinely (70-100%) on Medicare and Medicaid patients undergoing catheterization. In contrast, 34 (64.2%) laboratories performed RHC in less than 20% of their Medicare cases, whereas 39 (73.5%) did so among Medicaid cases. Eighteen (34%) laboratories performed RHC in less than 10% of Medicare cases. These data indicated that there was significant inter-hospital variation in the frequency with which RHC was performed. Beginning in 1993, ongoing educational meetings and conferences were held with all laboratories, but especially with the 10 that were at the high end of the RHC performance level. As a result of this ongoing intervention, the rate of RHC among Medicare patients fell from 89/100,000 in 1992 to 65/100,000 beneficiaries in 1996. From another perspective, the percentage of catheterized Medicare patients undergoing RHC fell from 30.5% in 1992 to 17.4% in 1996. The decline among the 10 laboratories was even more dramatic; the percentage of catheterized Medicare patients undergoing RHC fell from 89.1% in 1992 to 31.6% in 1996. The parallel drop for Medicaid patients over the same time period was from 92.8 to 32.7%. The results of the study indicate that many previously performed RHC in patients with coronary artery disease were routine and not medically indicated. The dramatic decreases in RHC documented in this study over a 4-year period demonstrate the success of quality improvement efforts jointly undertaken by providers and a peer review organization.

Timeliness and use of antibiotic prophylaxis in selected inpatient surgical procedures. The Antibiotic Prophylaxis Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Twenty-five percent of all nosocomial infections are wound infections. Professional guidelines support the timely use of preoperative prophylaxis for prevention of postoperative wound infections. Barriers exist in implementing this practice. IPRO, the New York State peer review organization, as part of the Health Care Financing Administration's Health Care Quality Improvement Program, sought to determine the proportion of patients receiving timely antibiotic prophylaxis for aortic grafts, hip replacements and colon resections in 44 hospitals in New York State. METHODS: IPRO conducted a retrospective medical record review of 44 hospitals through out New York State stratified for teaching, nonteaching status. A sample was drawn of 2651 patients, 2256 from Medicare and 395 from Medicaid, undergoing either abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, partial or total hip replacement or large bowel resection. The study determined the proportion of patients who had documentation of receiving antibiotics and those who received antibiotics timely, that is less than or equal to 2 hours preoperatively. RESULTS: Eighty-six percent of patients had documentation of receiving an antibiotic. Forty-six percent of aneurysm repairs and 60% of hip replacements had evidence of receiving timely antibiotic prophylaxis, that is within 2 hours prior to surgery. For colon resections, 73% of cases had either oral prophylaxis or timely parenteral therapy. An increased proportion of patients had received parenteral antibiotics prematurely as the surgical start time occurred later in the day. A total of 44 different antibiotics were recorded for prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis was performed in 81% to 94% of cases, however, anywhere from 27% to 54% of all cases did not receive antibiotics in a timely fashion. By delegating implementation of ordered antibiotic prophylaxis to the anesthesia team, timing may be improved and the incidence of postoperative wound infections may decrease.

The effects of regionalization on clinical outcomes for a high risk surgical procedure: a study of the Whipple procedure in New York State.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects on clinical outcomes of regionalization for a high risk surgical procedure, pancreaticoduodenectomy (the Whipple procedure). Claims data were examined for all Medicare patients undergoing the procedure in New York State for the 4-year period 1991-1994. Outcomes were analyzed for two regional hospitals and for 115 other hospitals that performed the procedure. In-hospital mortality and length of stay were significantly less at the two high volume regional hospitals when compared with the remaining low volume hospitals. In-hospital mortality rates at all hospitals generally decreased as the number of procedures increased. The results of this study demonstrate that there is significant value in regionalization for even relatively lower volume high risk surgical procedures.