Direct aortic cannulation for port-access mitral or coronary artery bypass grafting.

A technique is described for direct aortic arterial cannulation during Port-Access mitral valve or coronary artery bypass grafting. Femoral arterial cannulation is avoided, and endoaortic balloon occlusion is used for cardioplegic arrest. To date, excellent results have been obtained in 45 patients.

Comparison of direct aortic and femoral cannulation for port-access cardiac operations.

BACKGROUND: Differences in outcome after direct aortic cannulation (AORT) in the chest versus standard femoral arterial cannulation (FEM) have not been defined for minimally invasive cardiac operations utilizing the port-access approach. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of 165 patients undergoing port-access cardiac mitral valve operation (n = 126) or coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 39). In 113 patients, FEM was used, while in 52 patients, AORT was accomplished through a port in the first intercostal space. RESULTS: AORT eliminated endoaortic balloon clamp migration (0/36 [0%] vs. 17/95 [18%]), and groin wound or femoral arterial complications (0/52 [0%] vs. 11/113 [10%]) without changing procedure times (363+/-55 vs. 355+/-70 minutes). Complications attributable to AORT were injury to the right internal mammary artery and aortic cannulation site bleeding in 1 patient each. CONCLUSIONS: Direct aortic cannulation is technically easy, allows use of an endoaortic clamp, and avoids aorto-iliac arterial disease, the groin incision, and possible femoral arterial injury associated with femoral arterial cannulation. Direct arterial cannulation should expand the pool of patients eligible for port-access operation, and may become the standard for port-access procedures.

Mitral valve operation via Port Access versus median sternotomy.

OBJECTIVE: The advantages and disadvantages of minimally invasive Port Access mitral valve operation have not been defined relative to standard median sternotomy. A study was therefore designed to delineate differences in outcome from mitral operation via Port Access versus sternotomy in comparable patients. METHODS: The records of 41 consecutive patients undergoing isolated mitral valve replacement (n = 14) or repair (n = 27) were examined. All operations were performed using cardioplegic arrest through either median sternotomy (n = 20) or a small right anterolateral thoracotomy using an endoaortic clamp and catheter system (Heartport, Redwood City, CA) to arrest and decompress the heart (Port Access, n = 21). RESULTS: Both groups were well matched for age, mitral pathology, ejection fraction, and comorbidity. except that Port Access patients were less likely to be female. Three patients had undergone previous cardiac operations. Surgical procedure time was longer for Port Access patients (384+/-80 vs. 263+/-41 min, P < 0.05). Port Access provided significantly smaller incision length (8+/-2 vs. 26+/-2 cm, P < 0.01) and similar or shorter hospital stay (6+/-4 vs. 7+/-3 days). Port Access provided excellent visualization of the mitral valve and subvalvular apparatus, generally better than sternotomy, to allow complex mitral valve repairs. The greatest advantage of Port Access mitral operation was that Port Access patients returned to normal activity more rapidly (4+/-2 vs. 9+/-1 weeks, P = 0.01) than did patients undergoing standard median sternotomy. CONCLUSIONS: By avoiding a sternotomy, Port Access mitral valve operation provided a smaller incision and a dramatically more rapid return to normal activity than did median sternotomy. Port Access cardioplegic arrest with the Heartport system allowed visualization of the mitral valve superior to median sternotomy and has become the standard approach at this institution.

Quantitative analysis of regional wall thickening by transesophageal echocardiography.

To develop a method for quantitative analysis of regional left ventricular function from transesophageal two-dimensional echocardiograms, we conducted studies 10 and 20 minutes after induction of anesthesia in 16 patients with normal hearts who were undergoing minor orthopedic operations. Wall thickening was measured with the centerwall method along 100 chords drawn perpendicular to a line constructed around the center of the ventricular wall, midway between the endocardial and epicardial contours. Thickening, either normalized by the length of the end-diastolic perimeter or expressed as a percentage of the end-diastolic wall thickness at each chord, was compared with measurements of endocardial motion. Wall motion was relatively diminished in the anteroseptal region and enhanced on the contralateral wall, but wall thickening was homogeneous throughout the contour. Normalized wall thickening was significantly less variable (standard deviation/mean, 0.47 +/- 0.13) in the normal population than were either percent wall thickening (0.53 +/- 0.012) or wall motion (0.51 +/- 0.09) (p less than 0.005 for both comparisons). There was no significant change in regional or global function between 10 minutes and 20 minutes after the induction of anesthesia. In summary, normalized wall thickening as a parameter of regional left ventricular function is more homogeneous and less variable in subjects with normal hearts than is endocardial motion because wall thickening measurements are not subject to cardiac translocation artifacts. This low variability suggests that normalized wall thickening measured by the centerwall method may prove particularly useful for intraoperative and postoperative monitoring of regional left ventricular function by transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing both cardiac and noncardiac surgical procedures.

Imaging of the coronary arteries by transesophageal echocardiography.

Detection of the proximal left and right coronary arteries is possible by transesophageal echocardiography with rather high frequencies. The proximal left coronary artery can be detected in 86% of patients and the proximal right in 82%. Precise identification of obstructive disease is possible but is confounded by heart movement and as yet inadequate criteria for its presence to make this routinely clinically possible. It is also possible to detect flow within these vessels with conventional pulsed or Doppler color flow methods. Given recent improvements in system performance, it is likely that adequate descriptors of proximal coronary anatomy and obstruction will be likely with these approaches.

Current management of mitral valve incompetence associated with coronary artery disease.

At a time when hospital mortality for adult cardiac operations is continuing to fall, the combined mitral valve coronary bypass subset remains at relatively high risk. Efforts to improve results should be directed toward a more general application of mitral reconstruction in this population, tailoring the type of repair to the pathological anatomy of valve dysfunction. Other promising therapeutic measures include the liberal use of reperfusion therapy in the acute papillary muscle dysfunction group, better selection patients for operation, and perhaps operative recommendation to a greater proportion of the more stable patients that previously were treated medically. Finally increasing the general awareness of this problem should hasten the development of improved management strategies.