RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are various deformities described in the spectrum of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD) which not only have adverse effects on the foot but also on the entire lower limb. Early lower limb muscular fatigue and pain during exertion is the most common complaint of patients with PCFD. Surface electromyography (sEMG) provides an accurate assessment of muscle activity. In this study, we aim to compare the activities of quadriceps, hamstrings, and gastrosoleus muscle groups of adult patients with PCFD with normal lower limbs and correlate the radiological parameters and functional effects of PCFD with the activities. METHODS: Thirty patients with bilateral PCFD and 30 controls underwent weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and hindfoot alignment radiographs of the foot. Radiographic parameters of PCFD were assessed. Surface electromyography was used to assess the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gastrosoleus activities, and this was compared between the 2 groups and correlated with radiological measurements of PCFD. Tegner activity questionnaire was used to assess the functional effects of collapsed arch. RESULTS: Electrical activities of all muscle groups were significantly higher in cases than controls. Meary's angle and hindfoot moment arm had significant correlations with hamstring activity (P = .013) and gastrosoleus activity (P = .027), respectively. Tegner scores of cases were significantly lower than those of controls (P = .041). CONCLUSIONS: The PCFD causes an increase in activity of large muscles of the affected lower limb which act on joints other than those in the foot. This finding may be due to several compensatory mechanisms that counteract the deforming forces. This may be a cause for the frequent complaint, early fatigue, and hence functional impairment. However, most radiological parameters did not correlate with muscle activities and larger study size may be required for further association. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic: Level 3.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The study aimed at scoring Indian preterm infants at three months corrected age on the TIMP and then comparing the scores to the United States age-based population scores. METHODS: After obtaining Ethical clearance, participants meeting the inclusion criteria of 53 infants whose parents consented were screened and recruited (N = 47) at a tertiary care hospital. The TIMP was then administered at three months of corrected age. RESULTS: Data obtained from 47 infants born preterm (Male = 33, Female = 14) at three months corrected age with mean gestational age (34.4 ± 2.36 weeks) and mean birth weight (1.93 ± 0.55 kgs) was analyzed. Indian infants born preterm scored a mean of (98.17 ± 20.90) compared to the US mean of (108 ± 19), suggesting an under-performance. The average scores were lower when comparing the mean of the study group with the US-based age-matched population. CONCLUSION: Motor performance scores of Indian preterm infants were low when compared to their US counterparts. Since there exists a difference in the raw score obtained by Indian Preterm infants compared to the US-based population, it may not be appropriate to categorize the motor development of Indian infants based on the US population scores.
