RESUMO
Drastic and continuous decline in cane yields has become a major threat to sustainable sugarcane production in Ethiopia. Among the causes for the decline are the inefficient and ineffective system of monitoring sugarcane plantations. Adopting satellite-based crop monitoring through the Landviewer platform may circumvent this problem. However, the reliability of vegetation indexes calculated by the platform is unknown and thus requires evaluation. Accordingly, we tested the accuracy of selected Landviewer Calculated Vegetation Indexes (LCVIs) on three major sugarcane varieties and two cropping types. The goodness-of-fit of the sigmoid curve to the LCVIs profile of sugarcane was evaluated. The correlations between LCVIs and yield components, LCVIs and fractional green canopy cover (FGCC), as well as the time-serious Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and yields, were also analysed. We found that the goodness-of-fit of the sigmoid curve was significant (p < 0.001), with 84%-95% accuracy in all the indexes. The majority of LCVIs showed significant (p < 0.05) relationships with yield components and FGCC. The time-series NDVI also demonstrated a significant relationship with cane yield (R2 = 0.73-0.85) at the age of 10 months and above. The accuracy level of LCVIs varies with varieties and crop types, but the Normalized Difference Phenology Index (NDPI), Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), and NDVI were identified as the most consistent and effective LCVIs for sugarcane monitoring. Therefore, the accuracy of LCVIs was dependable and can be used effectively in monitoring sugarcane plantations to tackle the problem of continuous decline in the yield of the crop.
