A population pharmacokinetic model using allometric scaling for baricitinib in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Baricitinib is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in more than 70 countries, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in the European Union. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) models were developed in a phase 3 trial to characterize PK in pediatric patients with JIA and identify weight-based dosing regimens. The phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal, efficacy and safety trial, JUVE-BASIS, enrolled patients (aged 2 to <18 years) with polyarticular course JIA. During a safety/PK period, baricitinib concentration data from age-based dose cohorts were compared to concentrations from adult patients receiving 4-mg QD. PK data were used to develop a population PK model with allometric scaling to determine a weight-based posology in pediatric patients with JIA that matched the adult 4-mg exposure. Baricitinib plasma concentrations from 217 pediatric patients were used to characterize PK. Based on the adult model, pediatric PK was best described using a 2-compartment model with allometric scaling on clearance and volume of distribution and renal function (estimated with glomerular filtration rate [GFR], a known covariate affecting PK of baricitinib) on clearance. The PK modeling suggested the optimal dosing regimen based on weight for pediatric patients as: 2-mg QD for patients 10 to <30 kg and 4-mg QD for patients ≥30 kg. The use of a population PK model of baricitinib treatment in adult patients with RA, with the addition of allometric scaling for weight on clearance and volume terms, was useful to predict exposures and identify weight-based dosing in pediatric patients with JIA.

Microsampling in pediatric studies: pharmacokinetic sampling for baricitinib (Olumiant™) in global pediatric studies.

Background: Managing blood volumes in pediatric studies is challenging and should be minimized where possible. Results: A sensitive liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was validated and implemented across two phase III global pediatric trials. Two 10-µl aliquots of blood were collected at each time point using the Mitra® device. Concordance between plasma and dried blood was established from older pediatric patients. Incurred sample reanalysis was performed in both studies using the second Mitra tip and acceptance was greater than 83%. Conclusion: The use of microsampling to generate pharmacokinetic data in 2-18-year-old pediatric patients was successfully implemented. Positive feedback was received from clinical sites about the microsampling technique assisting with enrollment of pediatric patients.

A Phase 1b trial of prexasertib in combination with chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study explored the feasibility of safely combining prexasertib, with cisplatin-radiotherapy (Part A) or cetuximab-radiotherapy (Part B) in patients with previously untreated, locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Escalating doses of prexasertib were administered in each combination using a modified Time-to-Event Continual Reassessment Method. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed using standard non-compartmental methods of analysis. Antitumor activity was evaluated using RECIST version 1.1. RESULTS: In Part A, 7 patients received 20 mg/m2 prexasertib and cisplatin-radiotherapy. This dose exceeded the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); no other prexasertib dose was assessed. In Part B, 18 patients received prexasertib (20-40 mg/m2) and cetuximab-radiotherapy. The 30 mg/m2 dose of prexasertib was determined as the MTD. Febrile neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity in each arm. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events with both combinations were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, dysphagia, stomatitis, dry mouth, anemia, radiation skin injury [reported term radiation dermatitis], and nausea. PK of prexasertib was consistent with previously published data following prexasertib monotherapy. Overall response rate in Parts A and B was 71.4% and 83.3%, respectively. The small number of patients and follow-up limits the interpretation of efficacy data. CONCLUSION: This study did not establish a safe dose of cisplatin-radiotherapy. However, it demonstrates the proof-of-principle that prexasertib could be safely combined with cetuximab-radiotherapy. These data will provide the basis to leverage the potential radio-sensitization properties of a CHK1 inhibitor in combination with radiation or other targeted agents in a variety of therapeutic settings.

Pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin following concomitant intravenous administration of olaratumab (IMC-3G3) to patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Olaratumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, selectively binds to human platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and blocks ligand binding. This study assessed the effect of olaratumab on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of doxorubicin and the safety of olaratumab alone and in combination with doxorubicin. METHODS: This open-label randomized phase 1 trial enrolled 49 patients ages 27 to 83 with metastatic or locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients participated in 21-day treatment cycles (up to 8) until they met discontinuation criteria. In cycles 1 and 2, patients received olaratumab (15 mg/kg in Part A, 20 mg/kg in Part B) and doxorubicin (75 mg/m2 ). In cycles 3 through 8, patients continued combination treatment (15 mg/kg olaratumab + doxorubicin). Effect of olaratumab on PK of doxorubicin was determined in patients who received all doses in cycles 1 and 2. RESULTS: PK properties of doxorubicin administered alone or in combination with olaratumab (15 or 20 mg/kg) were similar for AUC(0-tlast ), AUC(0-∞), and Cmax . PK properties of olaratumab (15 or 20 mg/kg) were also similar when administered alone or in combination with doxorubicin. Three patients died (2 of disease progression and 1 of neutropenic enterocolitis). Fatigue and nausea (>75% of patients) were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Other common TEAEs included musculoskeletal pain, mucositis, constipation, and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Olaratumab at 15 or 20 mg/kg before doxorubicin infusion had no clinically relevant effect on systemic exposure to doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin alone in patients with metastatic or locally advanced STS.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of LY2599666, a PEG-Linked Antigen Binding Fragment that Targets Soluble Monomer Amyloid-ß.

LY2599666 is a humanized, affinity-optimized monoclonal antibody antigen-binding fragment linked to a PEG molecule and targets soluble amyloid-ß (Aß) monomers. This first-in-human dose ascending study assessed pharmacokinetics (PK) (measured as serum free LY2599666 concentration) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects (measured as plasma total soluble Aß40 and Aß42) after a single subcutaneous (SC) dose of 10, 25, 100, and 200 mg LY2599666 in healthy subjects. As LY2599666 binds to multiple soluble Aß monomers, a two-target mediated drug disposition model (TMDD) was developed to simultaneously fit serum LY2599666 concentration and Aß monomer levels. Four Alzheimer's disease patients completed 25 mg once-weekly dosing of LY2599666 for 12 weeks. In addition, single cerebrospinal fluid samples were collected to assess penetration capability across the blood-brain barrier. PK and PD data collected from the multiple dose cohort aligned with model predictions, suggesting the established TMDD model predicted suppression of soluble Aß40 and Aß42 in plasma after SC dosing of LY2599666.

Evaluation of the likelihood of a selective CHK1 inhibitor (LY2603618) to inhibit CYP2D6 with desipramine as a probe substrate in cancer patients.

LY2603618 is a selective inhibitor of deoxyribonucleic acid damage checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) and has been in development for the enhancement of chemotherapeutic agents. The study described was to assess the potential interaction between LY2603618 and cytochrome P450 isoform 2D6 (CYP2D6) substrate desipramine in patients with cancer. Before clinical investigation, in silico simulations (using Simcyp®) were conducted. An open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence study was planned in 30 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers, in which a 50 mg oral dose of desipramine was administered alone and in combination with 275 mg of LY2603618 (i.v. infusion). An interim analysis was planned after 15 patients completed both periods. Ratios of geometric least squares means (LSMs) of primary pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and 90% repeated confidence intervals (RCIs) between desipramine plus LY2603618 and desipramine alone were calculated. Lack of an interaction was declared if the 90% RCI fell between 0.8 and 1.25. The LSM ratios (90% RCI) for areas under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to tlast (AUC[0-tlast]) and to infinity (AUC[0-∞]) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) were 1.14 (1.04, 1.25), 1.09 (0.99, 1.21) and 1.16 (1.05, 1.29). In silico simulations were predictive of clinical results. Single doses of 275 mg LY2603618 administered with 50 mg desipramine were generally well tolerated. In conclusion, no clinically significant interaction was observed between LY2603618 and desipramine in patients with cancer. In silico predictions of clinical results demonstrated that mechanistic and physiologically based PK approaches may inform clinical study design in cancer patients.

A phase 1 and pharmacokinetic study of enzastaurin in pediatric patients with refractory primary central nervous system tumors: a pediatric brain tumor consortium study.

BACKGROUND: We sought to estimate the maximum tolerated or recommended phase 2 dose and describe the pharmacokinetics and toxicities of enzastaurin, an oral inhibitor of protein kinase Cß, in children with recurrent central nervous system malignancies. METHODS: Enzastaurin was administered continuously once daily at 3 dose levels (260, 340, and 440 mg/m(2)) and twice daily at 440 mg/m(2)/day. Plasma pharmacokinetics were evaluated following a single dose and at steady state. Inhibition of protein kinase C and Akt cell signaling in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was evaluated. Akt pathway activity was measured in pretreatment tumor samples. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients enrolled; 1 was ineligible, and 3 were nonevaluable secondary to early progressive disease. There were no dose-limiting toxicities during the dose-finding phase. Two participants receiving 440 mg/m(2) given twice daily experienced dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 thrombocytopenia resulting in delayed start of course 2 and grade 3 alanine transaminase elevation that did not recover within 5 days. There were no grade 4 toxicities during treatment. The concentration of enzastaurin increased with increasing dose and with continuous dosing; however, there was not a significant difference at the 440 mg/m(2) dosing level when enzastaurin was administered once daily versus twice daily. There were no objective responses; however, 11 participants had stable disease >3 cycles, 7 with glioma, 2 with ependymoma, and 2 with brainstem glioma. CONCLUSION: Enzastaurin was well tolerated in children with recurrent CNS malignancies, with chromaturia, fatigue, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea being the most common toxicities. The recommended phase 2 dose is 440 mg/m(2)/day administered once daily.

Phase I study of enzastaurin and bevacizumab in patients with advanced cancer: safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics.

PURPOSE: Given distinct mechanism of actions of enzastaurin and bevacizumab, preclinical studies suggest enhanced antitumor activity in combination. This phase I study assessed the combination's safety and efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six advanced cancer patients could be enrolled in each of 11 cohorts. Patients received an enzastaurin loading dose. Oral enzastaurin (500 mg once daily [QD], 250 mg twice daily [BID], 375 mg BID, 500 mg BID, and 750 mg BID) was escalated in each cohort in combination with bevacizumab dosed at 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks until a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in 2 of 6 patients in any cohort. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (31, ovarian cancer [ovcar]) were evaluable for safety and efficacy. Six treatment-related DLTs occurred: grade 3 fatigue (n=4), grade 4 cerebral hemorrhage, and grade 3 elevated aspartate transaminase. Common drug-related toxicities included change in color of urine and stool, fatigue, pain, diarrhea, and nausea. The maximum tolerated dose of enzastaurin was 750 mg BID in combination with any tested bevacizumab dose/schedule. Overall response rate was 19.4 % (32.3 % ovcar). Median time to progression was 3.7 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.7-5.5), with 8.3 months (95 % CI, 3.7-11.1) in ovcar. Overall, 35.9 % (50.4 % ovcar) of patients remained without disease progression after 6 months. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II doses of enzastaurin were 500 mg QD up to 500 mg BID with any tested dose/schedule of bevacizumab. This combination demonstrated encouraging clinical activity, particularly in ovcar.

A phase I study of LY317615 (enzastaurin) and temozolomide in patients with gliomas (EORTC trial 26054).

We report a phase 1 study to examine the safety and recommended dose of the oral protein kinase C-beta inhibitor (anti-angiogenic) enzastaurin in combination with single-agent temozolomide. The study was conducted in patients with recurrent glioblastoma or newly diagnosed disease that was not treatable with standard (chemo)radiotherapy. Patients were treated with standard dose temozolomide (200 mg/m(2) for 5 days every 4 weeks) together with daily oral enzastaurin. Three dose levels of enzastaurin were investigated: 250 mg daily (OD), 500 mg OD, and 250 mg twice daily (BID). Dose-limiting toxicity was determined in the first 2 cycles, but treatment continued until limiting toxicity or disease progression was identified. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity was noted at 250 mg OD or 500 mg OD. However, at 250 mg BID, 2 dose-limiting episodes of thrombocytopenia were noted. The recommended dose for enzastaurin in combination with standard 4-weekly temozolomide is therefore 500 mg OD. The pharmacokinetics of enzastaurin in combination with temozolomide was evaluated. Temozolomide did not appear to effect enzastaurin exposures at the 250 mg or 500 mg OD dose levels.

Dose escalation and pharmacokinetics study of enzastaurin and sunitinib versus placebo and sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess antiangiogenic effects of enzastaurin in combination with sunitinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: This was a multicenter, phase 2 study of enzastaurin and sunitinib versus placebo and sunitinib for adult patients with metastatic clear cell RCC. Part 1 was a 6-week, open-label, safety lead-in phase with 2 cohorts (sunitinib, both cohorts: 50 mg/d for 4 weeks; enzastaurin, cohort 1: a loading dose of 500 mg, followed by 250 mg daily; cohort 2: a loading dose of 1125 mg, followed by 500 mg daily). Part 2 was to be a randomized, double-blinded phase, with efficacy as the primary objective. Secondary objectives included the assessment of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Seventeen patients received ≥1 dose of study medication. Six patients (54.5%) in cohort 1 and 2 patients (33.3%) in cohort 2 received ≥6 cycles of treatment. All patients experienced ≥1 TEAE possibly related to study drug. Dose reductions were required as follows: cohort 1--enzastaurin, n=4 (36.4%), sunitinib, n=6 (54.5%); cohort 2--enzastaurin, n=3 (50.0%), sunitinib, n=2 (33.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Whereas the hypothesis that combining sunitinib and enzastaurin may result in greater antiangiogenic effects in RCC is based on solid scientific evidence, part 2 of the study was not activated due to the high number of TEAE-related dose reductions at the expected efficacious dose and overall decision by the sponsor not to pursue further development of enzastaurin for solid tumors.

A phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study of enzastaurin and erlotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Enzastaurin, an oral serine/threonine kinase inhibitor, targets the protein kinase C and AKT pathways with anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic effects. Erlotinib, an oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, has activity in solid tumors. Based on the promising combination of EGFR inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents, this phase I trial was initiated. METHODS: This single-institution, open-label, non-randomized trial used a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation model in patients with advanced solid malignancies including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two dose levels of enzastaurin (with loading doses) were explored: 250 mg daily and 500 mg daily. Erlotinib was given at 150 mg daily. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled in this study (median age, 64 years). Most patients were heavily pre-treated, female, and Caucasian and had NSCLC. The highest dose of enzastaurin, 500 mg daily, was tolerated with no unexpected adverse events and no alteration in the pharmacokinetics of either drug at this dose level. The mean clearance was 5.75 L/h for erlotinib and 53.8 L/h for enzastaurin. The most common possibly drug-related grade 3-4 adverse events included diarrhea (25.0%), neurologic symptoms (18.8%), and vomiting (18.8%). Activity was noted, with a partial response in one patient and prolonged disease stability for >12 cycles in three patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of enzastaurin 500 mg daily and erlotinib 150 mg daily is well tolerated and does not alter the pharmacokinetics of the individual drugs, with clinical activity seen. A phase II trial of this combination has been initiated in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC.