Rubidium deficiency in dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Since dialysis has brought long-term survival to uremic patients, we can now speculate on more subtle problems derived from imbalance or sub-optimal regulation of some elements such as trace metals. We focused on the rubidium (Rb) status in dialysis patients (HD), as concerns about its possible deficiency have been raised. METHODS: Rb in uremic patients was evaluated by: A) serum concentration (graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy) from blood samples of 70 patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) in comparison with 75 controls; B) tissue concentration (neutron activation analysis) from autopsy or biopsy samples (20) of HD patients in comparison with 21 controls; C) in vivo intradialytic mass balance during standard bicarbonate dialysis in 8 HD patients. RESULTS: A) Serum Rb concentrations in HD patients significantly were lower than in normal controls (304 +/- 81 micrograms/L versus 350 +/- 74 micrograms/L p < 0.001, log-transformed 5.68 +/- 0.28 versus 5.84 +/- 0.20, p < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression analysis found a significantly higher risk of serum Rb < 250-300 and 350 micrograms/L in uremic patients than in controls (Odd ratios or 12.6, 95% CI 2.77-57.04; 4.0, 95% CI 1.92-8.4; 2.08, 95% CI 1.02-4.25, respectively). B) Rb was significantly lower in tissues of HD patients, including brain (2250 +/- 1520 ng/g versus 5490 +/- 1250 ng/g, p = 0.0002) than normal controls. C) Rb was transferred from the patients' blood to the dialysis bath during a standard bicarbonate dialysis session, giving mean intradialytic Rb removal of 4.0 +/- 1.1 mg/session. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that Rb deficiency may arise in uremic patients, and indicate that diffusive dialysis treatments allow Rb removal which, however, with a standard bicarbonate schedule does not seem to be any greater than that expected with normal urine output (20 mg/week). Further studies are needed to clarify the roles of many factors in this Rb deficiency, including the effects of uremia by itself, pre-dialysis factors (diet, impaired renal function and drugs), dialysis procedures (frequency, hours, diffusive/convective components) or other biochemical/clinical parameters (hemoglobin, body mass index, age). The finding of a Rb deficiency in uremia is important as it has a role in neurobehavioural functions, mainly as an antidepressant. As Rb deficiency may be implicated in central nervous system alterations which strongly influence the quality of life, we believe that monitoring serum Rb in uremic patients and clarifying the causal mechanisms of deficiency will facilitate future therapeutic approaches.

Limited value of zinc protoporphyrin as a marker of iron status in chronic hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: In an attempt to find new parameters able to evaluate the actual iron availability by bone marrow cells, zinc protoporphyrin (ZnPP), a metabolic intermediate generated in the red blood cell by the incorporation of zinc instead of iron, has been proposed. ZnPP is a good marker of iron-deficiency anemia in non-uremic people, as red blood cell ZnPP concentration rises specifically (except for lead intoxication) in this condition. Existing data on ZnPP as a marker of iron deficiency in uremic patients comes mainly from cross sectional studies on chronic hemodialysis and has produced conflicting results. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Therefore, we prospectively studied 42 HID patients, 28-88 years old, 13-346 months of dialysis age, beginning from a period of maximal iron deficiency, due to the lack of parenteral iron compounds (T0) up to the end of more than one year of follow-up with continuous parenteral iron supplementation (T4). ZnPP, hemoglobin, transferrin saturation and ferritin were serially determined before and after six weeks (T1), four months (T2), seven months (T3) and 14 months (T4) of parenteral iron supplementation at a maintenance dose of 0.5-1 mg/kg/week. RESULTS: In comparison with baseline values (95+/-37 micromol/mol heme) there were no significant changes in ZnPP levels at T1 and T2 despite a continuous increase in both transferrin saturation and ferritin values, while ZnPP significantly decreased at T4 (63+/-37 micromol/mol heme, p<0.001). There was no correlation between ZnPP and both transferrin saturation and ferritin at any time during the study, the same was true for ZnPP and zinc and lead serum concentration, fibrinogen and reactive C protein levels at T1 and T4, respectively. At T4, only 2/10 patients who still showed ZnPP levels >80 micromol/mol heme had absolute or functional iron deficiency, when the percentage of hypochromic red cells were measured. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ZnPP untimely parallels a change in iron balance in only a proportion of uremic people, in as much as confounding factors, such as chronic inflammation and uremia in itself may obscure its relationship with iron status. Therefore, ZnPP cannot be assumed to be a first-line diagnostic marker of iron balance in uremic patients.

[Morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing dialysis. Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Our experience]. / Morbilità e mortalità in pazienti in dialisi. Confronto fra emodialisi e dialisi peritoneale. Nostra esperienza.

BACKGROUND: We have compared the hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis populations of our Center for morbidity and mortality, in a retrospective study of six years of activity. METHODS: We enrolled 125 patients (104 patients/year/million inhabitants), who had been in chronic dialysis from 1992 to 1997: 90 (22-90 years old) initiated in hemodialysis and 35 (27-82 years old) in peritoneal dialysis. RESULTS: We have evaluated survival and morbility, as hospitalization/patient/year in both groups. Mortality did not prove significantly different in the two groups. The global average of hospitalization was 8 days/patient/year for hemodialysis and 6 for peritoneal dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the short time of observation and the exiguity of numbers, our experience shows that the two methods are equivalent.