Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy--is it safe?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LDN) is a less invasive alternative to open nephrectomy (ODN) for living kidney donation. Concerns have been raised regarding the safety of LDN, the short and long term function of kidneys removed by LDN, and a potential higher incidence of urologic complications in LDN transplant recipients. METHODS: Between October 1997 and May 1999, 80 LDNs were performed at our center. All patients were followed longitudinally with office visits and telephone interviews. These LDNs were compared with 50 ODN performed from January 1996 to October 1997. RESULTS: LDN procedures took significantly longer than ODN (4.6 vs. 3.1 hr). However, LDN was associated with significant reduction in i.v. narcotic use, a rapid return to diet, and shorter hospital stay. Of the 80 LDN procedures, a total of 75 (94%) were completed laparoscopically. Five patients were converted to laparotomy: three for hemorrhage and two for complex vascular anatomy. ODN conversion was associated with large donor body habitus and/or obesity. Seven LDN patients had minor complications and 4 had major complications. All major complications consisted of vascular injuries (2 lumbar vein injuries, 1 renal artery, and 1 aortic injury). All patients made complete recoveries. All LDN kidneys functioned immediately posttransplant. We have observed 100% patient and 97% 1-year actuarial graft survival in LDN transplant recipients. There have been no short-or long-term urologic complications in this series. CONCLUSION: With increasing experience and standardization of technique, LDN is a safe and effective procedure. Patients undergoing LDN demonstrate clinically significant, more rapid postoperative recoveries and shorter hospital stays than ODN patients. Excellent initial graft function and long-term graft survival have been observed with LDN kidneys. Urologic complications can be avoided. LDN has become the preferred surgical approach for living kidney donation at our center.

The outcome of unretrieved gallstones in the peritoneal cavity during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with spillage of bile and gallstones occurs in a substantial number of patients (up to 40%). Most surgeons believe that free intraperitoneal stones are not a justification for conversion to laparotomy even if a large number of stones are left in situ. There are, however, a number of reports demonstrating that, on occasion, these unretrieved gallstones may cause infection or abscess, inflammation, fibrosis, adhesions, cutaneous sinuses, small bowel obstruction, or generalized septicemia. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of unretrieved gallstones in the peritoneal cavity after gallbladder perforation during LC. METHODS: In a 7-year period between 1989 and 1996, prospective data were maintained on 856 patients who underwent LCs by a single surgeon (R. J.F.). Of the 856 patients, 165 (16%) had gallbladder perforations resulting in lost gallstones in the peritoneal cavity. A concerted attempt was made to remove the lost stones using a variety of extraction devices. Of these 165 patients, 106 (64%) were available for follow-up through mail (76%) and by telephone (24%). The mean age of these patients was 64.9 years (range, 18 to 98 years), and the mean follow-up was 44.8 months (range 4.9 to 92.3 months). RESULTS: Of the 106 patients with unretrieved gallstones, we identified four patients with short-term complications and one patient with a long-term complication. The first patient with a short-term complication had pyrexia for 10 days postoperatively. Diagnostic evaluation, which included computed tomography (CT) scan, failed to reveal any abnormality. The patient was treated conservatively with a course of oral antibiotics. In the second patient, cellulitis developed at a drain site after its removal, which resolved with oral antibiotics. The third patient acquired an umbilical wound abscess, which drained spontaneously, requiring no treatment. A sterile subphrenic collection developed in the fourth patient 1 month postoperatively, which was treated with percutaneous drainage under CT guidance. The only long-term complication was spontaneous erosion of a gallstone from the back of a patient with a questionable history of inflammatory bowel disease 8 months postoperatively. All of the patients made complete recoveries. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients, unretrieved gallstones are of no consequence, but complications occur occasionally. It is therefore advisable to retrieve as many gallstones as possible during LC short of converting to a laparotomy.

Eight years' experience with the use of a transcystic common bile duct duodenal double-lumen catheter for the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported an alternative technique for treatment of choledocholithiasis found at laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) that can be considered with selected patients. This study was undertaken to update our experience with this alternative technique, which makes serial postoperative cholangiograms possible and facilitates stone extraction by assuring access to the common bile duct so that a guidewire-assisted endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy can be performed. METHODS: In the period between 1989 and 1997, prospective data were maintained on 1043 consecutive patients who underwent LC by a single surgeon. Fifty-two patients with abnormal cholangiograms were managed with a percutaneously placed double-lumen catheter threaded through the cystic duct and advanced into the duodenum. RESULTS: Five attempts failed, 3 because of failure to pass the catheter and 2 because of catheter dislodgement. Of the 47 remaining patients, 2 underwent intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomies using this alternative technique and 45 had cholangiograms repeated at 10 to 14 days. Twenty-three had negative cholangiograms, thus avoiding further procedures or unnecessary sphincterotomies because of spontaneous stone passage or initial false-positive cholangiograms. The remaining 22 had positive cholangiograms. Eighteen ultimately underwent sphincterotomies with stone extraction using a guidewire placed through the catheter. The other 4 had negative cholangiograms after serial follow-up, presumably because of spontaneous stone passage. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a transcystic double-lumen catheter passed through the ampulla of Vater is an effective and safe alternative for the management of choledocholithiasis discovered during LC.

Lung herniation secondary to minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting.

Lung herniation after thoracotomy is rare. We report a 66-year-old man who presented with this complication after undergoing attempted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. The defect was repaired with a composite of Marlex mesh and methyl methacrylate.

Appropriate timing of elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery following acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate timing of elective coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains uncertain. It is hypothesized that a waiting period allows the myocardium to recover prior to revascularization, thus decreasing morbidity and mortality. This study was designed to determine if a waiting strategy is justified following AMI in patients requiring elective CABG. METHODS: Between 1994 and 1996, 214 patients underwent isolated, nonrepeat, elective CABG. Three groups were evaluated: group I, control, 155 patients with no AMI; group 11, 39 patients with nontransmural AMI; and Group III, 20 patients with transmural AMI. Demographics, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected and compared among all groups. RESULTS: Groups were well-matched demographically: group I, patients waited an average of 2.3 days in hospital prior to operation; group II, an average of 4.2 days; and group III, an average of 5.2 days. Except for the use of inotropes, group I 34%, group 11 39%, and group III 70% (P = 0.007), and the intra-aortic balloon pump, group I 0%, group 11 8%, and group III 25% (P = 0.001). There were no differences in complications. Importantly, there was no difference in mortality or postoperative length of stay. The mortality in group I was 2.6%, in group 11 2.6%, and in group III 0%. The length of stay in groups I and II was 8.5 days, and in group III, 8.1 days. CONCLUSION: A waiting period of 3 to 5 days after a nontransmural AMI and 5 to 7 days after a transmural AMI can produce similar postoperative results to non-AMI patients undergoing CABG. Thus, a waiting strategy to allow the myocardium to recover is justified.