RESUMO
No scientific evidence on restrictions for patients following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is available. The goal of this study is to assess the practice and patterns of restrictions after single-level and multilevel ACDF at an academic institution. We submitted two questionnaires, for restrictions after single-level and multilevel ACDF, to 18 spine surgeons at our institution. Questions included length of time in practice, use of cervical collar, postoperative restrictions and practices. We received 10 complete responses. Four (40%) of the respondents were in practice for less than 5 years; 3 (30%) 5 or more years, but less than 10; 1 (10%) 10 or more years, but less than 20; 2 (20%) 20 or more years. Only two (20%) surgeons recommend a cervical collar after a single-level ACDF, while seven (70%) do so after a multilevel ACDF, for an average of 9.1 weeks and standard deviation (SD) of 2.8. Nine surgeons (90%) reported providing lifting restrictions after a single-level and multilevel ACDF, with a mean of 10 kg and SD of 2.5 in both cases. 5 (50%) give driving restrictions after a single-level ACDF, eight (80%) do so after a multilevel. eight (80%) recommend physical therapy after both single-level and multilevel ACDF. three (30%) obtain a CT to confirm fusion at one year. Only two (20%) recommend a bone stimulator. Significant variability exists among surgeons in regards to restrictions following ACDF, but some areas of consensus emerged: 90% of respondents give lifting restrictions, with a mean of 10 kg, 80% recommend physical therapy for a range of motion and muscle strengthening.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to investigate the clinical and manofluorographic findings of patients with anterior cervical osteophyte (ACO) dysphagia before and after surgery. METHODS: Chart review including manofluorography (MFG) data of patients undergoing ACO removal was undertaken. RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent transcervical ACO removal over a 10-year period. A postoperative hematoma was the only surgical complication. Overall, there was a significant postoperative decrease in Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale (FOSS). MFG data showed an elevated preoperative intrabolus pressure gradient across the osteophyte (IB-Gra), 39.78 mm Hg, and IB-Gra significantly decreased to 19 mm Hg 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Functional (FOSS) and objective MFG (IB-Gra) improvements occurred in patients who had ACO dysphagia and underwent surgery. These findings support high IB-Gra as a reliable objective indicator for surgical intervention for ACO dysphagia and IB-Gra as an appropriate parameter for follow-up after ACO removal. In selected patients, ACO removal by anterolateral-transcervical approach is a safe and highly effective treatment.
