Effect of creatine supplementation as a potential adjuvant therapy to exercise training in cardiac patients: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of oral creatine supplementation in conjunction with an exercise programme on physical fitness in patients with coronary artery disease or chronic heart failure. DESIGN: Single centre double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial. SETTING: Cardiac rehabilitation centre. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTION: 70 (4 women) cardiac patients (age 57.5 (8.4) years) were randomized to a placebo (n = 37) or creatine (n = 33) treatment for three months. Combined aerobic endurance and resistance training (three sessions/ week) was performed during supplementation. MAIN MEASURES: Aerobic power was determined during graded bicycle testing, knee extensor peak isometric and isokinetic strength, endurance and recovery were assessed by an isokinetic dynamometer, and health related quality of life was evaluated with the SF-36 and MacNew Heart Disease questionnaires. In addition, blood samples were taken after an overnight fast and 24 hour urinary collection was performed. RESULTS: At baseline there were no significant differences between both groups. We observed main time effects for aerobic power, muscle performance, health related quality of life, high density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides (pre vs post; P<0.05 for all). However, changes after training were similar between placebo group and creatine group (P>0.05). Further, no detrimental effect on renal or liver function was observed nor were there any reports of side effects. CONCLUSION: Oral creatine supplementation in combination with exercise training does not exert any additional effect on the improvement in physical performance, health related quality of life, lipid profile in patients with coronary artery disease or chronic heart failure than exercise training alone.

Effect of bisoprolol and atenolol on endurance exercise capacity in healthy men.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of a highly beta1-selective adrenoceptor antagonist bisoprolol with those of atenolol and placebo on endurance exercise capacity in young, healthy male volunteers. DESIGN: Twelve subjects randomly received oral placebo, atenolol (100 mg/day) or bisoprolol (10 mg/day) for 3 weeks, following a double-blind cross-over design. METHODS: At the end of each period, the subjects performed an endurance exercise test on the bicycle ergometer at 70% of maximal aerobic power. Cardiac output was measured by means of an automated CO2-rebreathing method. Venous blood was sampled before, during and after exercise. RESULTS: Exercise duration was not significantly different between the two drugs tested. Total exercise duration was significantly reduced by bisoprolol (-19.4 +/- 6.7%, P< 0.01) (mean +/- SEM) and by atenolol (-29.8 +/- 6.6%, P< 0.001), compared with placebo. Atenolol and bisoprolol were equally effective in lowering resting plasma renin activity, heart rate and systolic blood pressure. Resting and exercise stroke volume were significantly increased by both drugs, so that cardiac output was not significantly affected. Both drugs induced significant decreases in plasma-free fatty acid concentrations during recovery and blunted the exercise-induced increase. There were no significant relationships between the reduction of exercise duration and the haemodynamic changes or the degree of impairment of the exercise-induced increase in free fatty acid release resulting from beta-blockade. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that both drugs affect endurance exercise capacity in young, normotensive men, with a tendency to a smaller reduction during bisoprolol treatment. Haemodynamic variables are unlikely to be involved in the reduction of endurance exercise capacity. The role of the reduced availability of plasma free fatty acids remains unclear.