Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Smartphone-Based Contingency Management Intervention for Buprenorphine Adherence.

Buprenorphine is an important medication for treating opioid use disorder, but medication adherence and treatment retention are key issues that can limit its impact, especially when patients have concurrent stimulant use. Contingency management is efficacious in promoting medication adherence and drug abstinence. Delivering contingency management via smartphones addresses practical barriers to its adoption and improves patient access. A single-group (n = 20) nonexperimental study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of smartphone-based contingency management to promote adherence to buprenorphine treatment in people with opioid use disorder. Participants were recruited from outpatient treatment clinics. Over 12 weeks participants had access to a smartphone app that provided contingency management supported with peer recovery coaching. Adherence was confirmed daily either by GPS monitoring of clinic medication visits or self-recorded video, and salivary toxicology was conducted weekly. The overall rate of confirmed buprenorphine adherence was 76%, and visual inspection of individual participant outcomes shows consistent medication use for a large majority of participants. All participants were able to successfully use all app features and spend earnings. Participants rated the app and intervention highly on measures of likability, ease of use, and helpfulness. All participants (100%) were retained in buprenorphine treatment throughout the study period. Direct methods for confirming adherence appear superior to confirmation via salivary toxicology. This study shows that smartphone-based contingency management is a feasible means of promoting buprenorphine adherence. The potential efficacy of smartphone-based contingency management as a means of promoting buprenorphine adherence warrants evaluation in a randomized controlled trial.

Dissemination of Contingency Management for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.

Contingency management is an intervention for substance use disorders based on operant principles. The evidence base in support of contingency management is massive. It is effective in treating substance use disorder in general and opioid use disorder in particular. Dissemination has remained slow despite the urgency created by the opioid epidemic. Key barriers include a lack of expertise, time, and money. Implementing contingency management with smartphones eliminates the need for special training. It also solves logistical issues and requires little time on the part of clinicians. Thus, remaining barriers relate to cost. Federal anti-kickback regulations complicate solutions to the cost barrier. Other important regulatory challenges related to cost include the lack of billing codes and the difficulty of obtaining FDA approval for digital therapeutics. Even after the cost barrier is overcome, provider adoption is not guaranteed. Incentivizing providers for collaborative care may increase adoption and generate referrals. Recently proposed legislation and governmental policy statements provide optimism regarding the near-term large-scale adoption of contingency management in the treatment of opioid use disorder.

Hyperbolic modeling and assessment of hypothetical health behaviors during a viral outbreak using crowdsourced samples.

The COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity to investigate factors related to public response to public health measures, which could help better prepare implementation of similar measures for inevitable future pandemics. To understand individual and environmental factors that influence likelihood in engaging in personal and public health measures, three crowdsourced convenience samples from Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) completed likelihood-discounting tasks of engaging in health behaviors given a variety of hypothetical viral outbreak scenarios. Experiment 1 assessed likelihood of mask wearing for a novel virus. Experiment 2 assessed vaccination likelihood based on efficacy and cost. Experiment 3 assessed likelihood of seeking health care based on number of symptoms and cost of treatment. Volume-based measures and three-dimensional modeling were used to analyze hypothetical decision making. Hypothetical public and personal health participation increased as viral fatality increased and generally followed a hyperbolic function. Public health participation was moderated by political orientation and trust in science, whereas treatment-seeking was only moderated by income. Analytic methods used in this cross-sectional study predicted population-level outcomes that occurred later in the pandemic and can be extended to various health behaviors.

Implications of epidemic-pandemic convergence for routine care adoption of contingency management: A case study.

The significant increase in opioid-related drug overdoses during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has put an unprecedented burden on hospital emergency departments, who saw as high as an approximate 150% increase in emergency department (ED) admission rates in the initial months of the pandemic. Although overdose is a clear sign of problem drug use, only a small proportion of nonfatal overdose patients enroll in treatment within 30 days of their overdose. To bridge the gap between opioid overdoses and treatment entry, a smartphone-smart debit card contingency management program was developed to promote entry into medication-assisted treatment by out-of-treatment opioid users who have recently received care in a hospital emergency department. The case study described in this article highlights a successful implementation of this intervention despite numerous disruptions related to COVID-19 that would have made engagement difficult without the remote access to contingency management provided by this technology. Patient status over time is presented in conjunction with contingency management earnings. Technology-based contingency management may provide improved scalability, rigorous outcomes metrics, and lower costs than prior onsite, manual contingency management (CM) approaches. The COVID-19 pandemic, in combination with the opioid epidemic has created a context in which historical obstacles to the adoption of contingency management may be overcome. This case study demonstrates the potential utility of smartphone-based contingency management when in-person care is difficult to access or disrupted. The requirement for further research demonstrating the efficacy of these approaches is discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Predicting Substance Use Treatment Failure with Transfer Learning.

Transfer learning, which involves repurposing a trained model on a related task, may allow for better predictions with substance use data than models that are trained using the target data alone. This approach may also be useful for small clinical datasets. The current study examined a method of classifying substance use treatment success using transfer learning. Transfer learning was used to classify data from a nationwide database. We trained a convolutional neural network on a heroin use treatment dataset, then trained and tested on a smaller opioid use treatment dataset. We compared this model with a baseline model that did not benefit from transfer learning, and a tuned random forest (RF). The goal was to see if model weights transfer across related substances and from large to small datasets. The transfer model outperformed the RF model and baseline model. These findings suggest leveraging the power of large datasets for transfer learning may be an effective approach in predicting substance use disorder (SUD) treatment outcomes. It is possible to achieve a score that performs better than RF using transfer learning.

Delay discounting, probability discounting, and interdental cleaning frequency.

BACKGROUND: Interdental cleaning is recommended by dentists but many people do not floss regularly. The health benefits of interdental cleaning are delayed, and sensitivity to delay is an important factor in many health behaviors. Thus, the present studies explore the relationship between frequency of flossing, and sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic outcomes. METHOD: Crowd-sourced subjects were recruited in two studies (n = 584 and n = 321, respectively). In both studies, subjects reported their frequency of flossing and completed delay discounting and probability discounting tasks. Discounting was measured with area under the curve, and linear regression was used to analyze the results. RESULTS: Findings show that higher levels of delay discounting were associated with less frequent flossing (p < 0.001, both studies). In contrast, probability discounting was not significantly associated with flossing frequency (ns, both studies). CONCLUSION: The findings are consistent with prior studies involving other health behaviors such as attendance at primary care and medication adherence. Results suggest that interventions that reduce delay discounting may help promote regular interdental cleaning, and that delay discounting is a more robust predictor of health behaviors than probability discounting. In addition, interdental cleaning appears to be a reasonable target behavior for evaluating potentially generalizable behavioral health interventions. Thus, interventions that are successful in promoting oral health behaviors should be considered as candidates for evaluation in other health behavior domains.

A Systematic Review of Behavior-Outcome Psychological Assessments as Correlates of Suicidality.

AIM: Identifying correlates of suicidality is an important goal for suicide researchers because these correlates may predict suicidal behaviors. Psychological tasks that assess sensitivity to the outcomes of actions (i.e., consequence-based learning) have been commonly used by researchers seeking to identify correlates of suicidality. This is likely due to the straightforward integration of the tasks within most theoretical frameworks for understanding suicidality. Contextual factors have been shown to have a substantial effect on responding in behavior-outcome tasks. However, the direct relevance of these factors as determinants of behavior in suicide research is not clear. Thus, the purpose of this review was to assess the role of context in tasks involving behavior-outcome relations in suicide research. METHODS: Four databases were searched using terms from general learning theory. Articles that featured evaluation of tasks with hypothetical or real outcomes to differentiate suicidality were included. RESULTS: Eighty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Across studies there were 27 different tasks. Most instances of tasks across studies involved rewards (76.9%), while others emphasized punishment (15.7%), social (5.6%), or virtual suicide (1.8%) outcomes. Differentiation of suicidality was detected by 43.4%, 64.7%, 83.3%, and 50% of tasks featuring reward, punishment, social contexts, and virtual suicide respectively. All but five studies were retrospective. CONCLUSION: Tasks that more closely mimic contexts and outcomes related to suicide appear to produce more pronounced differentiation of people with suicidality from people without suicidality. The lack of prospective designs is an important limitation of the literature.HIGHLIGHTSTasks that involve punishment or social outcomes better discriminate suicidality.Reward-based tasks are overused in suicide research.The conditioning hypothesis of suicidality is closely aligned with the literature.Only 5 of 82 studies incorporated prospective measures.

A Systematic Review of Treatment Maintenance Strategies in Token Economies: Implications for Contingency Management.

Contingency management (CM) interventions are based on operant principles and are effective in promoting health behaviors. Despite their success, a common criticism of CM is that its effects to not persist after the intervention is withdrawn. Many CM studies evaluate posttreatment effects, but few investigate procedures for promoting maintenance. Token economy interventions and CM interventions are procedurally and conceptually similar. The token economy literature includes many studies in which procedures for promoting postintervention maintenance are evaluated. A systematic literature review was conducted to synthesize the literature on treatment maintenance in token economies. Search procedures yielded 697 articles, and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria resulted in 37 articles for review. The most successful strategy is to combine procedures. In most cases, thinning or fading was combined with programmed transfer of control via social reinforcement or self-management. Social reinforcement and self-monitoring procedures appear to be especially important, and were included in 70% of studies involving combined approaches. Thus, our primary recommendation is to incorporate multiple maintenance strategies, at least one of which should facilitate transfer of control of the target behavior to other reinforcers. In addition, graded removal of the intervention, which has also been evaluated to a limited extent in CM, is a reasonable candidate for further development and evaluation. Direct comparisons of maintenance procedures are lacking, and should be considered a research priority in both domains. Researchers and clinicians interested in either type of intervention will likely benefit from ongoing attention to developments in both areas.

A Smartphone-Smartcard Platform for Implementing Contingency Management in Buprenorphine Maintenance Patients With Concurrent Stimulant Use Disorder.

Background and Objectives: Opioid agonist pharmacotherapies are effective in the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) but concurrent stimulant use is common and can lead to relapse and treatment drop out. Contingency management in combination with opioid agonist pharmacotherapy has broad beneficial effects in polysubstance users, including promoting drug abstinence and treatment retention, but clinic-based implementation can be burdensome. The present study was conducted to evaluate a contingency management intervention delivered via a smartphone-smartcard platform in OUD patients who had concurrent stimulant use disorder. Methods: Retrospective comparison of (n = 124) patients; half received the contingency management intervention and half were matched controls. Drug use and clinic attendance outcomes over four consecutive 30-day periods were analyzed with regression. Results: The intervention group showed consistently higher rates of drug abstinence and clinic attendance which were significant at the latter two timepoints. Discussion: Smartphone-smartcard platforms can facilitate dissemination of contingency management by surmounting or obviating key barriers to adoption. They appear to be convenient for all stakeholders, are easy to use, and facilitate high-fidelity implementation. Delivering contingency management via a smartphone-smartcard platform produces effects consistent with those observed when the intervention is delivered with substantially costlier and more burdensome in-person procedures.

Smartphone-based incentives for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy: A randomized controlled trial.

Antiretroviral therapy can improve the lives of people living with HIV and reduce the rate of transmission. However, high levels of adherence are required. Some people living with HIV, including people who use drugs, are at elevated risk for non-adherence. Contingency management is a promising intervention for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Barriers to adoption of contingency management include lack of provider expertise and implementation effort. To address these barriers, a smartphone-based adherence intervention was developed. HIV + people with a substance use disorder were required to submit video selfies of medication consumption that met validity criteria. Monetary incentives were delivered to participants via reloadable debit cards, contingent upon a valid video. The intervention was evaluated in a small (n = 50) randomized controlled trial. Intervention participants submitted 75% of possible videos, and 81% of videos met validity criteria, indicating a high level of usability. Participants also rated the intervention as highly acceptable. Adherence was measured as the percent of participants who achieved a 95% adherence threshold, and also as the overall percent of days in which participants were adherent to their antiretroviral therapy. The former showed a significant effect for group, (p = .034) but this was not maintained when adjusting for stratification variables as covariates (p = .094). The latter measure showed a significant group × time interaction. Smartphone-based contingency management is a promising method for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Assessing the cost-benefit of the intervention and development of strategies for long-term adherence are priorities for future research.

A smartphone-smartcard platform for contingency management in an inner-city substance use disorder outpatient program.

Contingency management (CM) is an efficacious incentive-based intervention for promoting drug abstinence, but treatment providers have not widely adopted it. Smartphone and smart debit card technologies can deliver automated, patient-centered, high-fidelity CM and related services, including cognitive behavioral therapy and appointment reminders. This study evaluated clinical outcomes associated with an integrated smartphone-smartcard platform in an inner-city outpatient clinic. We enrolled adults with opioid use disorder (n = 85) over nine weeks, and they received CM services for four months. We retrospectively compared them to matched controls who received services at the same time, from the same provider at a similar, nearby clinic in the same city. The platform was associated with significantly higher rates of counseling appointment attendance in study months 2 to 4 (9.6%-18.0% increases) and an odds ratio of 4.84 for increased proportion of urine samples consistent with drug abstinence and adherence to prescribed medication, compared to controls at 120 days (P < 0.05). Overwhelmingly, participants reported that they found the platform acceptable. These results suggest that the platform is an effective method for remote delivery of CM services that could overcome key logistical barriers to widespread adoption of CM among treatment providers.

Contingency management for the treatment of methamphetamine use disorder: A systematic review.

Methamphetamine use continues to be an important public health problem. Contingency management is among the most effective interventions for reducing methamphetamine use. It has been more than ten years since the last systematic review of contingency management for methamphetamine use disorder. Since then, an additional ten randomized controlled trials and a variety of other studies have been completed. The present systematic review includes 27 studies. Several factors, most notably problem severity, appear to predict treatment outcome. However, the effectiveness of CM has been demonstrated in studies restricted to MSM, studies restricted to implementation in community programs, and in studies of the general population of methamphetamine users conducted in research treatment programs. There appear to be broad benefits of contingency management intervention, including greater drug abstinence, higher utilization of other treatments and medical services, and reductions in risky sexual behavior. Twenty of the twenty-one studies that reported abstinence outcomes showed an effect of contingency management on abstinence, and seven of the nine studies that reported sexual risk behavior outcomes showed an effect of contingency management in reducing risky sexual behavior. Taken together, recent evidence suggests strongly that outpatient programs that offer treatment for methamphetamine use disorder should prioritize adoption and implementation of contingency management intervention.

The compatibility of employment-based contingency management and vocational services at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) provides vocational rehabilitation services for veterans with substance use disorders in programs such as Compensated Work Therapy (CWT). For some veterans, these services include regular monitoring and wages for work in prevocational settings. Independently of these services, the availability of a highly effective intervention for substance use disorders called contingency management (CM) has been rapidly increasing at the VA. CM involves the provision of material incentives such as prizes, vouchers, or money contingent upon verification of drug abstinence via toxicology screening. An employment-based version of CM has been demonstrated to be as effective as other forms of CM. Under this version of CM, access to paid employment or paid job training is the incentive. This employment-based CM could be used in conjunction with CWT or other vocational rehabilitation services used at the VA. The implementation of CM in such settings would increase access to CM for veterans and would be highly likely to improve substance use treatment outcomes among those receiving the service. This intervention might also improve key behavioral outcomes related to obtaining and maintaining competitive employment. VA officials in charge of employment-based treatment programs such as CWT should seriously consider integrating CM into their programs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Acceptability and willingness to pay for contingency management interventions among parents of young adults with problematic opioid use.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for new research addressing the cost prohibitive nature of maintaining contingency management (CM) in community settings. While researchers propose managed care as an option to support costs, there is no research on self-pay models. To inform such research, it is important first to understand client willingness to pay for CM services. We examine acceptability and willingness to pay for CM services among parents with and without young adult children with problematic opioid use. METHODS: A web-based survey was administered to a sample of parents of adult children ages 18-35 with (target sample) and without (comparison sample) a history of problematic opiate use. RESULTS: One hundred thirty parents participated (ntarget = 30; ncomparison = 100) and were predominately white, college educated, and of higher income. Findings showed a high proportion of participants had positive opinions of using incentives for substance use treatment and would consider incentive-based treatments for their child. Most participants reported they would be willing to pay for CM at levels consistent with amounts used in efficacious programs but expressed worry that incentives would be used to buy drugs. Most participants reported this worry would be eased if incentives were delivered via reloadable gift cards and if incentives were only delivered during periods of abstinence. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine parent perceptions of incentives and acceptability and willingness to pay for CM services. Results suggest self-pay models for disseminating CM to young adults with problematic opioid use may be an option.

The effects of extended-release injectable naltrexone and incentives for opiate abstinence in heroin-dependent adults in a model therapeutic workplace: A randomized trial.

AIM: To determine whether extended-release injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX), incentives for opiate abstinence, and their combination reduce opiate use compared to a usual care control and whether the combination reduces opiate use compared to either treatment alone. DESIGN: Randomized 2 × 2 single-site controlled trial conducted from November 2012 through May 2016. After a detoxification and oral naltrexone induction, participants were assigned to a Usual Care, Abstinence Incentives, XR-NTX, or XR-NTX plus Abstinence Incentives group for a six-month intervention period. SETTING: A model therapeutic workplace where participants could work on automated computer programs that targeted job-skills training for 4 h every weekday for 24 weeks and earn about $10 per hour. PARTICIPANTS: 84 heroin-dependent adults who were unemployed and medically approved for naltrexone. Most participants were male (71.4%), African American (80.1%), and cocaine dependent (71.4%). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was the percentage of urine samples negative for opiates that were collected at once weekly assessments (24 per participant) that were not part of the intervention and for which participants were paid $10 for completing. INTERVENTION: Participants who attended the workplace provided thrice-weekly urine samples. Abstinence Incentives participants had to provide opiate-free urine samples to maintain maximum pay. XR-NTX participants received one injection every 4 weeks and were required to take injections in order to work and to maintain maximum pay. Usual Care participants were not offered XR-NTX and opiate urinalysis results did not affect pay. FINDINGS: A large percentage (65 of 149; 43.6%) of individuals failed the induction protocol required for randomization and to be eligible to receive XR-NTX. When missing urine samples were considered positive, there was no significant interaction between XR-NTX and Abstinence Incentives. XR-NTX plus Abstinence Incentives participants provided significantly more opiate-negative samples (81.3%, SD 39.0%) than XR-NTX participants (64.5%, SD 47.9%; aOR 10.4, 95% CI 1.3-85.5; P = .030). When urine samples were not replaced, there was a significant interaction between XR-NTX and Abstinence Incentives (aOR 77.0, 95% CI 1.3-4432;P = 0.036); XR-NTX plus Abstinence Incentives participants provided significantly more opiate-negative samples (99.6%, SD 0.1%) than XR-NTX participants (85.0%, SD 35.7%; aOR 147.6, 95% CI 6.3-3472; P = 0.002), Abstinence Incentives participants (91.9%, SD 27.3%; aOR 121.7, 95% CI 4.8-3067; P =0.004), and Usual Care participants (78.7%, SD 41.0%; aOR 233.4, 95% CI 9.4-5814; P <.001). No other group differences were significant. CONCLUSION: XR-NTX plus incentives for opiate abstinence increased opiate abstinence, but XR-NTX alone did not. XR-NTX can promote opiate abstinence when it is combined with incentives for opiate abstinence in a model therapeutic workplace.

Factors associated with using opiates while under extended-release naltrexone blockade: A descriptive pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) blocks the effects of opioids for 4weeks, yet many patients continue to use them. To learn more about why this occurs, we collected self-reports on subjective effects and drug use factors from participants' most recent heroin/opiate use while under XR-NTX blockade. METHODS: Participants (n=38) were unemployed, heroin-dependent adults enrolled in a randomized controlled trial evaluating employment-based incentives to promote adherence to XR-NTX. A subset of participants (n=18) were asked to complete a survey about their most recent use of heroin/opiates when they provided an opiate-positive urine sample while under XR-NTX blockade. Surveys were administered weekly, and participants could complete multiple surveys throughout the trial. Participants reported how high they were (11-point scale; 0=not at all, 10=extremely), how much heroin/opiates they took (less, more, or about the same as usual before starting naltrexone), whether they used cocaine at the same time, and the routes of administration for heroin/opiates and cocaine (if used). All analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: Of the 107 surveys, 75.7% indicated being "not at all" high the last time heroin/opiates were used. 75.5% of surveys reported opiate amounts that were less than usual, and only 7.5% reported amounts larger than usual. Cocaine was used at the same time as heroin for 57.9% of surveys but typically through a different route (74.2%). DISCUSSION: Using heroin/opiates while under XR-NTX blockade is not strongly associated with self-reports of high, taking larger than normal amounts of opiates, or taking opiates and cocaine simultaneously via the same route. Future research should incorporate measures of naltrexone concentration and more comprehensive and frequent assessments using ecological momentary assessment.

Earning, Spending, and Drug Use in a Therapeutic Workplace.

Drug addiction is a chronic, relapsing health problem that is associated with the degree to which individuals choose small, immediate monetary outcomes over larger, delayed outcomes. This study was a secondary analysis exploring the relation between financial choices and drug use in opioid-dependent adults in a therapeutic workplace intervention. Sixty-seven participants were randomly assigned to a condition in which access to paid job training was contingent upon naltrexone adherence (N = 35) or independent of naltrexone adherence (N = 32). Participants could earn approximately $10 per hour for 4 hours every weekday and could exchange earnings for gift cards or bill payments each weekday. Urine was collected and tested for opiates and cocaine thrice weekly. Participants' earning, spending, and drug use were not related to measures of delay discounting obtained prior to the intervention. When financial choices were categorized based on drug use during the intervention, however, those with less frequent drug use or frequent use of one drug spent a smaller proportion of their daily earnings and maintained a higher daily balance than those who frequently tested positive for both drugs (i.e., opiates and cocaine). Several patterns described the relation between cumulative earning and spending including no saving, periods of saving, and sustained saving. One destructive effect of drug use may be that it creates a perpetual zero-balance situation in the lives of users, which in turn prevents them from gaining materials that could help to break the cycle of addiction.

Effects of incentives for naltrexone adherence on opiate abstinence in heroin-dependent adults.

AIM: To test whether an incentive-based intervention that increased adherence to naltrexone also increased opiate abstinence. DESIGN: Post-hoc combined analysis of three earlier randomized controlled trials that showed individually that incentives for adherence to oral and to extended-release injection naltrexone dosing schedules increased naltrexone adherence, but not opiate abstinence. SETTING: Out-patient therapeutic work-place in Baltimore, MD, USA. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and forty unemployed heroin-dependent adults participating from 2006 to 2010. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were hired in a model work-place for 26 weeks and randomized to a contingency (n = 72) or prescription (n = 68) group. Both groups were offered naltrexone. Contingency participants were required to take scheduled doses of naltrexone in order to work and earn wages. Prescription participants could earn wages independent of naltrexone adherence. MEASURES: Thrice-weekly and monthly urine samples tested for opiates and cocaine and measures of naltrexone adherence (percentage of monthly urine samples positive for naltrexone or percentage of scheduled injections received). All analyses included pre-randomization attendance, opiate use and cocaine use as covariates. Additional analyses controlled for cocaine use and naltrexone adherence during the intervention. FINDINGS: Contingency participants had more opiate abstinence than prescription participants (68.1 versus 52.9% opiate-negative thrice-weekly urine samples, respectively; and 71.9 versus 61.7% opiate-negative monthly urine samples, respectively) based on initial analyses [thrice-weekly samples, odds ratio (OR) = 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.7-6.5, P < 0.01; monthly samples, OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.0-7.1, P = 0.06] and on analyses that controlled for cocaine use (thrice-weekly samples, OR = 3.9, 95% CI = 3.3-4.5, P < 0.01; monthly samples, OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.1-11.1, P = 0.04), which was high and associated with opiate use. The difference in opiate abstinence rates between contingency and prescription participants was reduced when controlling for naltrexone adherence (monthly samples, OR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.7-1.7, P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Incentives for naltrexone adherence increase opiate abstinence in heroin-dependent adults, an effect that appears to be due to increased naltrexone adherence produced by the incentives.

Academic skills of chronically unemployed drug-addicted adults.

BACKGROUND: The strong association between unemployment and drug addiction suggests that employment interventions are an important and needed focus of drug-addiction treatment. The increasing necessity of possessing basic academic skills to function in the workplace may require that some individuals receive educational training along with vocational training. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the academic skills of drug-addicted and chronically-unemployed adults (N = 559) who were enrolled in one of six studies conducted at the Center for Learning and Health in Baltimore, MD. METHODS: Upon study enrollment, academic skills in math, spelling, and reading were examined using the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT-3 or WRAT-4) and educational history was examined using the Addiction Severity Index-Lite. RESULTS: Although participants completed an average of 11 years of education, actual academic skill level was at or below the seventh grade level for 81% of participants in math, 61% in spelling, and 43% in reading, and most participants were classified as Low Average or below based on age group norms. Despite the fact that participants in this analysis were studied across several years and were from diverse populations, rates of high school completion and academic skill levels were remarkably similar. CONCLUSIONS: Programs designed to improve the long-term employment status of drug-addicted individuals may benefit from the inclusion of basic adult education; future research on the topic is needed. Although establishing basic skills does not directly address chronic unemployment, it may help individuals obtain the jobs they desire and function effectively in those jobs.

Employment-based reinforcement of adherence to oral naltrexone in unemployed injection drug users: 12-month outcomes.

Oral naltrexone could be a promising relapse-prevention pharmacotherapy for recently detoxified opioid-dependent patients; however, interventions are often needed to promote adherence with this treatment approach. We recently conducted a study to evaluate a 26-week employment-based reinforcement intervention of oral naltrexone in unemployed injection drug users (Dunn et al., 2013). Participants were randomly assigned into a contingency (n = 35) group required to ingest naltrexone under staff observation to gain entry into a therapeutic workplace or a prescription (n = 32) group given a take-home supply of oral naltrexone and access to the workplace without observed ingestion. Monthly urine samples were collected and analyzed for evidence for naltrexone adherence, opioid use, and cocaine use. As previously reported, contingency participants provided significantly more naltrexone-positive urine samples than prescription participants during the 26-week intervention period. The goal of this current study is to report the 12-month outcomes, which occurred 6 months after the intervention ended. Results at the 12-month visit showed no between-groups differences in naltrexone-positive, opioid-negative, or cocaine-negative urine samples and no participant self-reported using naltrexone at the follow-up visit. These results show that even after a period of successfully reinforced oral naltrexone adherence, longer-term naltrexone use is unlikely to be maintained after reinforcement contingencies are discontinued. (PsycINFO Database Record