Histological evaluation of titanium fiber mesh-coated implants in a rabbit femoral condyle model.

OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed to comparatively evaluate new bone formation into the pores of a flexible titanium fiber mesh (TFM) applied on the surface of implant. METHODS: Twenty-eight custom made cylindrical titanium implants (4 ×10 mm) with and without a layer of two different types of TFM (fiber diameter of 22 µm and 50 µm, volumetric porosity ~70%) were manufactured and installed bilaterally in the femoral condyles of 14 rabbits. The elastic modulus for these two TFM types was ~20 GPa and ~5 GPa respectively, whereas the solid titanium was ~110 GPa. The implants (Control, TFM-22, TFM-50) were retrieved after 14 weeks of healing and prepared for histological assessment. The percentage of the bone area (BA%), the bone-to-implant contact (BIC%) and amount were determined. RESULTS: Newly formed bone into mesh porosity was observed for all three types of implants. Histomorphometric analyses revealed significantly higher (~2.5 fold) BA% values for TFM-22 implants (30.9 ± 9.5%) compared to Control implants (12.7 ± 6.0%), whereas BA% for TMF-50 did not significantly differ compared with Control implants. Furthermore, both TFM-22 and TFM-50 implants showed significantly higher BIC% values (64.9 ± 14.0%, ~2.5 fold; 47.1 ± 14.1%, ~2 fold) compared to Control (23.6 ± 17.4%). Finally, TFM-22 implants showed more and thicker trabeculae in the peri-implant region. SIGNIFICANCE: This in vivo study demonstrated that implants with a flexible coating of TFM improve bone formation within the inter-fiber space and the peri-implant region.

Porous titanium fiber mesh with tailored elasticity and its effect on stromal cells.

Porous titanium fiber mesh (TFM) is considered a suitable scaffold material for bone reconstruction. Also, TFM can be used to cover the surface of bone-anchored devices, that is, orthopedic or dental implants. The titanium fiber size has an effect of the stiffness as well as porosity of the titanium mesh, which can influence the behavior of bone forming cells. Therefore, the aim of this study was to vary TFM composition, in order to achieve different stiffness, and to assess the effects of such variation on the behavior of bone marrow-derived stromal cells (BMSCs). With that purpose, nine types of TFM (porosities 60-87%; fiber size 22-50 µm), were examined for their mechanical properties as well as their effect on the proliferation and differentiation of rat bone marrow-derived stromal cells (rBMSCs) up to 21 days. Dynamic mechanical analysis revealed that the stiffness of TFM were lower than of solid titanium and decreased with larger fiber sizes. The stiffness could effectively be tailored by altering fiber properties, which altered the pore simultaneously. For the 22 and 35 µm size fiber meshes with the highest porosity, the stiffness closely matched the value found in literature for cortical bone. Finally, all tested TFM types supported the growth and differentiation of rBMSCs. We concluded that TFM material has been proven cytocompatible. Further preclinical studies are needed to assess which TFM type is most suitable as clinical use for bone ingrowth and bone regeneration.