Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Pediatr ; 182(9): 4173-4183, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37436521

RESUMO

The aim of the present study, endorsed by the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS) and the Italian Society of Neonatology (SIN), was to analyze the current delivery room (DR) stabilization practices in a large sample of European birth centers that care for preterm infants with gestational age (GA) < 33 weeks. Cross-sectional electronic survey was used in this study. A questionnaire focusing on the current DR practices for infants < 33 weeks' GA, divided in 6 neonatal resuscitation domains, was individually sent to the directors of European neonatal facilities, made available as a web-based link. A comparison was made between hospitals grouped into 5 geographical areas (Eastern Europe (EE), Italy (ITA), Mediterranean countries (MC), Turkey (TUR), and Western Europe (WE)) and between high- and low-volume units across Europe. Two hundred and sixty-two centers from 33 European countries responded to the survey. At the time of the survey, approximately 20,000 very low birth weight (VLBW, < 1500 g) infants were admitted to the participating hospitals, with a median (IQR) of 48 (27-89) infants per center per year. Significant differences between the 5 geographical areas concerned: the volume of neonatal care, ranging from 86 (53-206) admitted VLBW infants per center per year in TUR to 35 (IQR 25-53) in MC; the umbilical cord (UC) management, being the delayed cord clamping performed in < 50% of centers in EE, ITA, and MC, and the cord milking the preferred strategy in TUR; the spotty use of some body temperature control strategies, including thermal mattress mainly employed in WE, and heated humidified gases for ventilation seldom available in MC; and some of the ventilation practices, mainly in regard to the initial FiO2 for < 28 weeks' GA infants, pressures selected for ventilation, and the preferred interface to start ventilation. Specifically, 62.5% of TUR centers indicated the short binasal prongs as the preferred interface, as opposed to the face mask which is widely adopted as first choice in > 80% of the rest of the responding units; the DR surfactant administration, which ranges from 44.4% of the birth centers in MC to 87.5% in WE; and, finally, the ethical issues around the minimal GA limit to provide full resuscitation, ranging from 22 to 25 weeks across Europe. A comparison between high- and low-volume units showed significant differences in the domains of UC management and ventilation practices.    Conclusion: Current DR practice and ethical choices show similarities and divergences across Europe. Some areas of assistance, like UC management and DR ventilation strategies, would benefit of standardization. Clinicians and stakeholders should consider this information when allocating resources and planning European perinatal programs. What is Known: • Delivery room (DR) support of preterm infants has a direct influence on both immediate survival and long-term morbidity. • Resuscitation practices for preterm infants often deviate from the internationally defined algorithms. What is New: • Current DR practice and ethical choices show similarities and divergences across Europe. Some areas of assistance, like UC management and DR ventilation strategies, would benefit of standardization. • Clinicians and stakeholders should consider this information when allocating resources and planning European perinatal programs.

2.
Pediatr Res ; 93(5): 1141-1148, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34743180

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of infant mortality worldwide with non-specific and varied presentation. We aimed to catalogue the current definitions of neonatal sepsis in published randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHOD: A systematic search of the Embase and Cochrane databases was performed for RCTs which explicitly stated a definition for neonatal sepsis. Definitions were sub-divided into five primary criteria for infection (culture, laboratory findings, clinical signs, radiological evidence and risk factors) and stratified by qualifiers (early/late-onset and likelihood of sepsis). RESULTS: Of 668 papers screened, 80 RCTs were included and 128 individual definitions identified. The single most common definition was neonatal sepsis defined by blood culture alone (n = 35), followed by culture and clinical signs (n = 29), and then laboratory tests/clinical signs (n = 25). Blood culture featured in 83 definitions, laboratory testing featured in 48 definitions while clinical signs and radiology featured in 80 and 8 definitions, respectively. DISCUSSION: A diverse range of definitions of neonatal sepsis are used and based on microbiological culture, laboratory tests and clinical signs in contrast to adult and paediatric sepsis which use organ dysfunction. An international consensus-based definition of neonatal sepsis could allow meta-analysis and translate results to improve outcomes.


Assuntos
Sepse Neonatal , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Mortalidade Infantil , Sepse Neonatal/diagnóstico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/terapia
3.
Neonatology ; 119(2): 184-192, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35051924

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the policies and practices about neonatal resuscitation in a large sample of European hospitals. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional electronic survey. A 91-item questionnaire focusing on the current delivery room practices in neonatal resuscitation domains was individually sent to the directors of 730 European neonatal facilities or (in 5 countries) made available as a Web-based link. A comparison was made between hospitals with ≤2,000 and those with >2,000 births/year and between hospitals in 5 European areas (Eastern Europe, Italy, Mediterranean countries, Turkey, and Western Europe). RESULTS: The response rate was 57% and included participants from 33 European countries. In 2018, approximately 1.27 million births occurred at the participating hospitals, with a median of 1,900 births/center (interquartile range: 1,400-3,000). Routine antenatal counseling (p < 0.05), the presence of a resuscitation team at all deliveries (p < 0.01), umbilical cord management (p < 0.01), practices for thermal management (p < 0.05), and heart rate monitoring (p < 0.01) were significantly different between hospitals with ≤2,000 births/year and those with >2,000 births/year. Ethical and educational aspects were similar between hospitals with low and high birth volumes. Significant variance in practice, ethical decision-making, and training programs were found between hospitals in 5 different European areas. CONCLUSIONS: Several recommendations about available equipment and clinical practices recommended by the international guidelines are already implemented by centers in Europe, but a large variance still persists. Clinicians and stakeholders should consider this information when allocating resources and planning European perinatal programs.


Assuntos
Ressuscitação , Estudos Transversais , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Itália , Gravidez , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Pediatr Res ; 91(4): 735-742, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34997225

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The lack of a consensus definition of neonatal sepsis and a core outcome set (COS) proves a substantial impediment to research that influences policy and practice relevant to key stakeholders, patients and parents. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. In the included studies, the described outcomes were extracted in accordance with the provisions of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) handbook and registered. RESULTS: Among 884 abstracts identified, 90 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this review. Only 30 manuscripts explicitly stated the primary and/or secondary outcomes. A total of 88 distinct outcomes were recorded across all 90 studies included. These were then assigned to seven different domains in line with the taxonomy for classification proposed by the COMET initiative. The most frequently reported outcome was survival with 74% (n = 67) of the studies reporting an outcome within this domain. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review constitutes one of the initial phases in the protocol for developing a COS in neonatal sepsis. The paucity of standardised outcome reporting in neonatal sepsis hinders comparison and synthesis of data. The final phase will involve a Delphi Survey to generate a COS in neonatal sepsis by consensus recommendation. IMPACT: This systematic review identified a wide variation of outcomes reported among published RCTs on the management of neonatal sepsis. The paucity of standardised outcome reporting hinders comparison and synthesis of data and future meta-analyses with conclusive recommendations on the management of neonatal sepsis are unlikely. The final phase will involve a Delphi Survey to determine a COS by consensus recommendation with input from all relevant stakeholders.


Assuntos
Sepse Neonatal , Projetos de Pesquisa , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Sepse Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepse Neonatal/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Pediatr Res ; 91(2): 432-439, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34961785

RESUMO

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had a significant impact worldwide, particularly in middle- and low-income countries. While this impact has been well-recognized in certain age groups, the effects, both direct and indirect, on the neonatal population remain largely unknown. There are placental changes associated, though the contributions to maternal and fetal illness have not been fully determined. The rate of premature delivery has increased and SARS-CoV-2 infection is proportionately higher in premature neonates, which appears to be related to premature delivery for maternal reasons rather than an increase in spontaneous preterm labor. There is much room for expansion, including long-term data on outcomes for affected babies. Though uncommon, there has been evidence of adverse events in neonates, including Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children, associated with COVID-19 (MIS-C). There are recommendations for reduction of viral transmission to neonates, though more research is required to determine the role of passive immunization of the fetus via maternal vaccination. There is now considerable evidence suggesting that the severe visitation restrictions implemented early in the pandemic have negatively impacted the care of the neonate and the experiences of both parents and healthcare professionals alike. Ongoing collaboration is required to determine the full impact, and guidelines for future management. IMPACT: Comprehensive review of current available evidence related to impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neonates, effects on their health, impact on their quality of care and indirect influences on their clinical course, including comparisons with other age groups. Reference to current evidence for maternal experience of infection and how it impacts the fetus and then neonate. Outline of the need for ongoing research, including specific areas in which there are significant gaps in knowledge.


Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , Doenças do Recém-Nascido , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas , Troca Materno-Fetal , Placenta/virologia , Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/complicações
7.
J Perinat Med ; 48(9): 867-873, 2020 Nov 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32769228

RESUMO

The goal of perinatal medicine is to provide professionally responsible clinical management of the conditions and diagnoses of pregnant, fetal, and neonatal patients. The New York Declaration of the International Academy of Perinatal Medicine, "Women and children First - or Last?" was directed toward the ethical challenges of perinatal medicine in middle-income and low-income countries. The global COVID-19 pandemic presents common ethical challenges in all countries, independent of their national wealth. In this paper the World Association of Perinatal Medicine provides ethics-based guidance for professionally responsible advocacy for women and children first during the COVID-19 pandemic. We first present an ethical framework that explains ethical reasoning, clinically relevant ethical principles and professional virtues, and decision making with pregnant patients and parents. We then apply this ethical framework to evidence-based treatment and its improvement, planned home birth, ring-fencing obstetric services, attendance of spouse or partner at birth, and the responsible management of organizational resources. Perinatal physicians should focus on the mission of perinatal medicine to put women and children first and frame-shifting when necessary to put the lives and health of the population of patients served by a hospital first.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Defesa do Paciente/ética , Assistência Perinatal/ética , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , COVID-19 , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/ética , Cuidados Críticos/ética , Ética Médica , Feminino , Feto , Hospitalização , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Obstetrícia/ética , Pediatria/ética , Assistência Perinatal/métodos , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Triagem
8.
Pediatr Res ; 88(1): 14-26, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32126571

RESUMO

Sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the neonatal population, and at present, there is no unified definition of neonatal sepsis. Existing consensus sepsis definitions within paediatrics are not suited for use in the NICU and do not address sepsis in the premature population. Many neonatal research and surveillance networks have criteria for the definition of sepsis within their publications though these vary greatly and there is typically a heavy emphasis on microbiological culture. The concept of organ dysfunction as a diagnostic criterion for sepsis is rarely considered in neonatal literature, and it remains unclear how to most accurately screen neonates for organ dysfunction. Accurately defining and screening for sepsis is important for clinical management, health service design and future research. The progress made by the Sepsis-3 group provides a roadmap of how definitions and screening criteria may be developed. Similar initiatives in neonatology are likely to be more challenging and would need to account for the unique presentation of sepsis in term and premature neonates. The outputs of similar consensus work within neonatology should be twofold: a validated definition of neonatal sepsis and screening criteria to identify at-risk patients earlier in their clinical course. IMPACT: There is currently no consensus definition of neonatal sepsis and the definitions that are currently in use are varied.A consensus definition of neonatal sepsis would benefit clinicians, patients and researchers.Recent progress in adults with publication of Sepsis-3 provides guidance on how a consensus definition and screening criteria for sepsis could be produced in neonatology.We discuss common themes and potential shortcomings in sepsis definitions within neonatology.We highlight the need for a consensus definition of neonatal sepsis and the challenges that this task poses.


Assuntos
Sepse Neonatal/sangue , Sepse Neonatal/classificação , Neonatologia/normas , Biomarcadores/sangue , Consenso , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Programas de Rastreamento , Sepse Neonatal/diagnóstico , Prognóstico , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Int J Oncol ; 23(1): 139-43, 2003 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12792786

RESUMO

We report on a patient with a clinically diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) with so far unrecorded complex translocations. As GTG-banding was not able to resolve all karyotypic changes, spectral karyotyping (SKY) and multiplex-fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH) were performed for comparison. Both methods gave nearly identical results, however, they were unable to characterize all involved chromosomal breakpoints in detail. Thus, multicolor banding (MCB) technique was applied and its results were confirmed for two large derivative chromosomes by microdissection and reverse painting. Using this battery of molecular cytogenetic approaches the karyotype of this AML case could be described as 40 approximately 44,XY,der(1)t(1;5;8;20) (1qter-->1p12::5q14.3-->5q15 or 5q15-->5q14.3::8p11.2-->8p23.? 3::20p11.1-->20p13),del(2)(q12),der(3)t(3;6),der(5)t(5;18) (5p15.33-->5q11::18q21.3-->18q23),del(6),-8,der(9)t(9;17;15),der(10)t(3;10),del(11)(q24),-15,-16,del(17),der(18) t(8;18;5;2;20)(8q24.3-->8q24.2 or 8q24.2-->8q24.3::18p11.22-->18q21.3::5q14.3-->5q11::2q32-->2q12::20q13.2-->20q13.33), der(20)t(1;20;18)(1p36.33-->1p31.3-22.3::20p11.1-->20q11.2 or 20q11.2-->20p11.1::18p11.22-->18p11.32).


Assuntos
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Translocação Genética , Bandeamento Cromossômico , Cromossomos/ultraestrutura , Deleção de Genes , Humanos , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Cariotipagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...