Feasibility and early toxicity of intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer using the papillon + system: First results.

Background and Purpose: Breast intra operative radiation therapy has been evaluated with different systems delivering 20-21 Gy with treatment times around 30 min. Papillon + TM Contact X-ray machine was designed to produce a 50 kVp beam with a high dose rate ≥ 15 Gy/minute. A pilot study with the first prototype was conducted in Nice. Materials and methods: The inclusion criteria were age ≥ 60 years, unifocal ductal breast adenocarcinoma ≤ 2.5 cm, grade 1-2. Surgical local excision with sentinel node dissection was performed and the applicator was placed in the tumor bed after excision with a prescribed dose of 20 Gy. The main end point of the study was the doses measured with the Gafchromic films; two were located at the skin surface and two in the excision cavity. Secondary endpoints were early toxicity and relapse free survival. Results: Between 10/2018 and 09/2019, 26 patients were included. Mean Gafchromic doses were 18.8 Gy ± 2 Gy at the south pole, 15.6 Gy ± 2.81 Gy at the equator and 2.5 Gy ± 1.67 Gy at the skin. With a median follow-up time of 12 months, no skin or subcutaneous toxicity > grade 2, no local relapse and no metastasis were observed. Conclusion: This is the first phase II study testing the Papillon + tm system for breast IORT with in vivo dosimetry measurements and reassuring clinical data.

[Is preoperative axillary radio-cytology justified after ACOSOG Z001?] / La radio-cytologie axillaire préopératoire est-elle justifiée après l'ACOSOG Z001 ?

INTRODUCTION: Invasive breast cancer without clinical adenopathy (cN0) is currently explored by the sentinel node (GS) technique, except in the case of positive preoperative radio-cytological screening, where axillary curage (CA) remains systematic from the outset. Since the publication of the ACOSOG-Z0011 trial, abstention from CA is possible in patients presenting less than three metastatic GS. As a result, the value of axillary radio-cytological screening is being questioned as it could potentially lead to axillary surgical over-treatment. The objective of this study was to study clinically N0 patients with positive axillary cytology and to compare it to a group of patients with positive GS. METHOD: One hundred and forty-seven patients with cN0 pN+ breast cancer treated between 2014 and 2016 were selected retrospectively. Two groups were constituted according to the initial radio-cytological evaluation. A CA was systematically performed. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with positive axillary cytology (n=31 vs. n=116) had more metastatic lymph nodes (P=0.01) in the AC, larger (P<0.001), less differentiated (P<0.001) tumours, and shorter recurrence-free survival (P=0.0114). It also appeared that 38.7 % of patients with a positive cytology had at most two metastatic nodes and could, according to the results of ACOSOG, benefit from therapeutic de-escalation. CONCLUSION: X-ray cytological screening remains essential in order to select a subgroup of patients with a high lymph node tumour load. Additional studies are necessary in order to be able to offer therapeutic de-escalation to 1/3 of these patients without the risk of under-treatment for the remaining 2/3.

[Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on breast and gynecologic cancers management. Experience of the Surgery Department in the Nice Anticancer Center]. / Impact de la pandémie de COVID-19 sur les prises en charge pour cancer du sein et gynécologique.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the containment measures and the recommendations of several societies in oncology may have impacted the request for initial care for cancers. METHODS: In this monocentric retrospective study, the number and the characteristics of patients received for a first consultation for a breast or gynecologic tumor were compared between the containment period and a control period. The times from diagnosis to treatment and the type of initial care were compared too. RESULTS: During the outbreak, 91 patients were seen for a new request, versus 159 during the control period, a decrease of 43.5 %. Patients were older (62.9 versus 60.9 years old) but this difference was not significant. Tumor stage was not modified. Concerning senology, the time from the biopsy to the first consultation was 5.5 days longer during the outbreak (difference statistically insignificant). Among the 51 patients requiring a surgical treatment during the outbreak, 16 (31.48 %) were postponed after the end of the containment measures. After all, the average time from the consultation to the treatment was not modified. No modification of type of treatment was observed. DISCUSSION: At the height of the pandemic, benefits and risks of the cancer treatment had to be daily balanced against the risk of exposition to the COVID-19. The evaluation of practices for cancer care is essential to understand the real impact of COVID-19 outbreak on global cancer management, so as to get prepared to further crises.

[Preoperative breast imaging review: Interests and limits of specialized validation in oncology]. / Relecture préopératoire en sénologie : intérêts et limites d'une validation spécialisée en oncologie.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of systematic radiological review by breast specialist radiologist of malignant breast lesion imaging on the therapeutic management of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data collection was performed for patients with histopathologically proved breast cancer or suspicious breast lesion on imaging realized out of our institution. Patients underwent systematic mammary and axillary ultrasound, imaging review and if necessary complementary mammographic images. We analyzed the number of additional breast biopsies and axillary lymph node fine needle aspiration (FNA) with their histopathological results. We assessed their impact by comparing the final surgical treatment to the one planned before review. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventeen patients were included, with a total of 230 BIRADS 0, 4, 5 or 6 breast lesions. Seventy-six additional breast core biopsies were realized, leading to diagnose 43 additional BIRADS 6 lesions (24 infiltrative carcinomas, 9 DCIS and 10 atypical lesions) in 30 patients (13.82%). Thirty-five additional lymph node FNA were realized with 12 metastatic nodes and 3 false negative samples. Imaging review lead to change surgical treatment in 59 patients (27.19%, P<0.01) with modification in breast surgery in 37 patients, axillary surgery in 8 patients and both sites surgery in 12 patients. CONCLUSION: This study shows an impact of systematic radiological review by breast specialist radiologist in therapeutic management of patients treated for malignant breast lesion.

[Integrating patient education in your oncology practice]. / Éducation thérapeutique du patient, concepts et mise en œuvre.

BACKGROUND: Patient education is the process by which health professionals impart information to patients and their caregivers that will alter their health behaviors; improve their health status to better manage their lives with a chronic disease. Patient education implies a profound paradigm shift in the conception of care among health professionals, and should result in structural care changes. Patient education has been promoted by the French Health system for 30years, including in the 2009 HPST law and Cancer Plan 2014-2019. A patient education program was designed in our hospital for breast cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary and transversal team of health professionals and resource patients was trained before grant application for funding of the program by the regional health care agency. Management of the project required that a functional unit be built for recording of all patient education related activities. A customized patient education program process was built under the leadership of a coordinator and several patient education project managers during bimonthly meetings, using an accurate timeline and a communication strategy to ensure full institutional support and team engagement. RESULTS: The grant was prepared in four months and the program started within the next four months with the aim to include 120 patients during year 1. The program includes a diagnosis of patient abilities and well-being resources, followed by collective and individual workshops undertaken in 4months for each patient. DISCUSSION: Patient education is positively evaluated by all participants and may contribute to better health care management in the long term but the financial and human resources allocated to such programs currently underestimate the needs. Sustainability of patient education programs requires that specific tools and more commitment be developed to support health care professionals and to promote patient coping and empowerment in the long term.

Margin width should not still enforce a systematic surgical re-excision in the conservative treatment of early breast infiltrative ductal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In cases where breast conservative surgery was performed for infiltrative ductal carcinoma (IDC), margin status is an independent prognostic factor for local ipsilateral relapse (LIR). There is no validated definition of a clear margin. We investigated factors associated with residual disease on re-excision specimen and the impact of margin status on the risk of LIR. METHODS: From January 1992 to December 2002, 454 patients were retrospectively included. Patients had undergone conservative surgery and radiotherapy for IDC. Two groups were defined: group 1, involved or close margin (<3 mm) and a re-excision; and group 2, involved or close margin without re-excision. The risk factors for residual disease in the re-excision specimen were analyzed in group 1, and the rate of 5-year LIR was analyzed in both groups. RESULTS: Among patients who experienced a surgical re-excision for involved or close margin, 21% (55 of 206) had residual tumor. The multivariate analysis showed that only a margin involved with intraductal carcinoma remained predictive for residual disease. According to the multivariate analysis, only hormone therapy (p < 10(-6)), diffuse involved margins (p = 0.003), and margins involved with intraductal component (p < 10(-6)) were predictive of LIR. Re-excision for a margin involved with intraductal carcinoma significantly improved local relapse-free survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of IDC, re-excision for a close margin or a focally involved margin had no impact on local relapse-free survival. The decision to perform a surgical re-excision for an involved margin should not be systematic but should take multiple risk factors into consideration, such as patient age or margin diffuse involvement.

[The role of interval surgery in the treatment's strategy of advanced ovarian cancer]. / Place de la chirurgie d'intervalle dans le traitement du cancer avancé de l'ovaire.

The extent of cytoreductive surgery and the amount of residual disease are among the most important factors impacting the survival of women with advanced ovarian cancer. Chronology of treatment is still debating. In the French standard treatment, primary surgery remains the cornerstone and interval surgery is an option. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery may reduce morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless the impact of this strategy on survival is still controversial.