[Parental experiences of distance schooling during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effects on children with and without mental health problems]. / Ouders over afstandsonderwijs door COVID-19: effecten op kinderen met en zonder psychische problemen.

BACKGROUND: In some lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021, schools were closed and children attended distance learning. AIM: To investigate parental experiences of the effects of distance learning on the wellbeing of child and parent(s), and whether this differed between children with and without mental health problems and their parents. METHOD: Parents of children with (n = 192) and without (n = 271) mental health problems reported their experiences with distance learning. We investigated whether experiences differed between groups of parents, and whether experiences were influenced by characteristics of parents. RESULTS: Parents of children with mental health problems reported the quality of distance learning and the ability of their child to participate as lower relative to other parents. These differences increased when parents themselves were in higher need of support. General experiences and the levels of stress reported by parents did not differ between groups. Parents reported an increase in their child’s digital media use, particularly for children with mental health problems. CONCLUSION: Children with mental health problems seem more negatively affected by distance learning, especially when parents have problems themselves. These findings are in line with multiple recent studies and argue for minimizing distance learning.

[Intensive home treatment (IHT): indication criteria for children and adolescents]. / Intensive home treatment: indicatie­criteria bij kinderen en jongeren.

BACKGROUND: Intensive home treatment (IHT) is an intervention that provides intensive psychiatric (crisis) care in the home environment. AIM: To formulate indication criteria for IHT in children and adolescents, to improve assessment and to reduce the time needed for triage. METHOD: The Delphi method was used to assess the opinion of experts on the indication for IHT in children and adolescents. In round 1, 18 employees of the IHT team of Levvel (Academic Centre for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry) list the indication criteria that they thought should be used to determine whether a patient belonged to the IHT target group. Open coding was used to analyze the responses and to derive statements that, in the following three rounds, were rated by the participants on their importance. RESULTS: 33 statements were deemed important enough (> 80% consensus) to include in the final list. These statements concerned the aim, target group, treatment services, the role and responsibilities of the referrer and logistical issues. CONCLUSION: The list with assessment indicators is a promising tool to help IHT teams working with children and adolescents improve and standardize their triage.