European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery changed the management of numerous surgical conditions. It was associated with many advantages over open surgery, such as decreased postoperative pain, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay and excellent cosmesis. Since two decades single-incision endoscopic surgery (SIES) was introduced to the surgical community. SIES could possibly result in even better postoperative outcomes than multi-port laparoscopic surgery, especially concerning cosmetic outcomes and pain. However, the single-incision surgical procedure is associated with quite some challenges. METHODS: An expert panel of surgeons has been selected and invited to participate in the preparation of the material for a consensus meeting on the topic SIES, which was held during the EAES congress in Frankfurt, June 16, 2017. The material presented during the consensus meeting was based on evidence identified through a systematic search of literature according to a pre-specified protocol. Three main topics with respect to SIES have been identified by the panel: (1) General, (2) Organ specific, (3) New development. Within each of these topics, subcategories have been defined. Evidence was graded according to the Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Recommendations were made according to the GRADE criteria. RESULTS: In general, there is a lack of high level evidence and a lack of long-term follow-up in the field of single-incision endoscopic surgery. In selected patients, the single-incision approach seems to be safe and effective in terms of perioperative morbidity. Satisfaction with cosmesis has been established to be the main advantage of the single-incision approach. Less pain after single-incision approach compared to conventional laparoscopy seems to be considered an advantage, although it has not been consistently demonstrated across studies. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the increased direct costs (devices, instruments and operating time) of the SIES procedure and the prolonged learning curve, wider acceptance of the procedure should be supported only after demonstration of clear benefits.

Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopic versus single-port sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic approach is the gold standard for surgical treatment of morbid obesity. The single-port (SP) approach has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective technique for the treatment of morbid obesity in several case control studies. OBJECTIVES: Compare conventional multiport laparoscopy (LAP) with an SP approach for the treatment of morbid obesity using sleeve gastrectomy in terms of postoperative pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) 0-100, surgical outcome, weight loss, and aesthetical satisfaction at 6 months after surgery. SETTING: University Hospital, Spain. METHODS: Randomized, controlled pilot study. The trial enrolled patients suitable for bariatric surgery, with a body mass index lower than 50 kg/m2 and xiphoumbilical distance lower than 25 cm. Patients were randomly assigned to receive LAP or SP sleeve gastrectomy. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled; 15 were assigned to LAP group and 15 to SP group. No patients were lost during follow-up. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. A significantly higher level of pain during movement was noted for the patients in the LAP group on the first (mean VAS 49.3±12.2 versus 34.1±8.9, P = .046) and second days (mean VAS 35.9±10.2 versus 22.1±7.9, P = .044) but not the third day (mean VAS 20.1±5.2 versus 34.12.9 ±4.3, P = .620). No differences regarding pain at rest, operative time, complications, or weight loss at 6 months were observed. Higher aesthetical satisfaction was noticed in SP group. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, SP surgery presented less postoperative pain in sleeve gastrectomy compared with the conventional laparoscopic approach with similar surgical results.

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Cholecystectomy: First Experiences with a New Standardized Technique Replicating the Four-Port Technique.

BACKGROUND: After reports on laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy, concerns have been raised over the level of difficulty and a potential increase in complications when moving away from conventional gold standard multiport laparoscopy due to incomplete exposure and larger umbilical incisions. With continued development of technique and technology, it has now become possible to fully replicate this gold standard procedure through an LESS approach. First experiences with the newly developed technique and instrument are reported. METHODS: Fifteen patients presenting with cholelithiasis without signs of inflammation were operated using all surgical steps considered appropriate for the conventional four-port laparoscopic approach, but applied through a single access device. Operation-centered outcomes are presented. RESULTS: There were no peri- or postoperative complications. Mean operating time was 32.3 minutes. No conversion to regular laparoscopy was required. The critical view of safety was achieved in all cases. Mean skin incision length was 2.2 cm. CONCLUSION: The application of a standardized technique combined with the use of a four-port LESS device allows us to perform LESS cholecystectomy, giving us a correct exposure of the structures and without increasing the mean operating time combining previously reported advantages of LESS. A universal trait of any new technique should be safety and reproducibility. This will enhance its applicability by large number of surgeons and to large number of patients requiring cholecystectomy.