Development of a novel technique for esophageal reconstruction via oral-vestibule-enteral anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: Narrowing, trauma, tumors, and systemic diseases can cause esophageal dysfunction. Severe cases resist traditional surgery, leading to long-term gastrostomy or jejunostomy tubes, affecting patients negatively. No established surgery ensures both airway and oral function with proper speech. This article introduces the oral-vestibule-enteral anastomosis (OVEA) technique, targeting patients with compromised epiglottic closure competence and loss of cervical esophagus, where conventional methods fall short. METHODS: Technique description study evaluated in 13 patients in a single tertiary referral center in Mexico City treated with OVEA from January 1990 to July 2023. RESULTS: Of the 13 patients (69% male; mean age, 37.14 ± 12.907 years), preoperative conditions included a mean body mass index of 17.78 ± 2.66 kg/m2, 46% with previous abdominal surgeries, and 31% with a smoking history. After OVEA, complications affected 46%, primarily pneumonia (23%), abscess formations (15%), intestinal necrosis (8%), and airway fistula (8%). Reoperation was needed in 38%, addressing functionality loss, necrosis, stenosis, and jawbone remodeling. No fatalities occurred within the first 6 months after surgery; 84% had successful gastrostomy tube removal, and 8% retained a tracheostomy tube. Currently 13 patients (92%) use the OVEA as their main enteral route of feeding. CONCLUSION: The OVEA technique seems promising for cases involving esophageal loss or impaired epiglottic function, enhancing patients' quality of life by enabling oral feeding and restoring regular eating habits. Further research should focus on long-term results and identifying optimal candidates for this innovative surgical method.

Total esophageal replacement by transmediastinal transposition of the stomach in a gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the thoracic esophagus: a rare surgical case report.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract. A rare site of localization of these tumors is the esophagus. Evidence-based consensus regarding the type of surgery for patients with esophageal GIST remains unclear. CLINICAL CASE: A female without history of diseases experienced dysphagia, weight loss (6 kg) and malaise. Computed tomography revealed thickening of the esophagus. During the endoscopic ultrasonography a localized lesion was observed in the esophagus that depended on the muscularis propria. We opted to treat with an esophagectomy with replacement by transmediastinal transposition of the stomach. Patient recovered well from the surgery and she was discharged home in stable condition in post-operative day seven. At 6 months she has no symptoms. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the clinical presentation of an esophageal GIST which represents only 1% of all sites where GISTs have been reported; open surgery was successfully performed with minimal morbidity, complete resolution of symptoms and improvement of the patient's quality of life. Esophagectomy with replacement by transmediastinal transposition of the stomach should be performed when the center has experience to do so with minimal morbidity and mortality.

ANTECEDENTES: Los tumores del estroma gastrointestinal (GIST) son las lesiones malignas mesenquimales más comunes del tracto digestivo. Un sitio raro de localización de estos tumores es el esófago. A la fecha actual no hay un consenso claro basado en evidencia científica con respecto al tipo de cirugía a realizar en pacientes con GIST en esta localización inusual. CASO CLÍNICO: Una mujer previamente sana presentó disfagia, pérdida de peso (6 kg) y malestar general. La tomografía computarizada reveló un engrosamiento del esófago y en la ultrasonografía endoscópica se observó una lesión localizada en el esófago dependiente de la muscular propia. Se optó por realizar esofagectomía con reemplazo mediante transposición transmediastinal del estómago. La paciente se recuperó bien de la cirugía y fue dada de alta en condición estable en el séptimo día del posoperatorio. A los 6 meses, se encuentra asintomática. CONCLUSIÓN: Este caso ilustra la presentación clínica de un GIST esofágico que representa solo el 1% de todos los sitios reportados. La cirugía se realizó con éxito, con morbilidad mínima, resolución completa de los síntomas y mejoría de la calidad de vida de la paciente. La esofagectomía con reemplazo mediante transposición transmediastinal del estómago (comúnmente llamado ascenso gástrico) debe realizarse cuando el centro tiene experiencia para hacerlo con morbilidad y mortalidad mínimas.

[Immunohistochemical Expression of CD117 (c-kit) in 75 Renal Cell Tumors]. / Expresión inmunohistoquímica de CD117 (c-kit) en 75 tumores de células renales.

OBJECTIVE: c-kit encodes the membrane-bound tyrosine kinase c-kit, whose expression has been identified in several human neoplasms. We analyzed the immunohistochemical expression of c-kit in renal cell tumors. METHODS: 75 cases of renal cell tumors were obtained from the surgical pathology archives at the ABC Medical Center in Mexico, for the period 2001 to 2011. We selected one representative paraffin block of the tumor and immunohistochemical staining for CD117 (c-kit) was performed. Immunopositivity was analyzed according cell location, intensity and percentage. RESULTS: c-kit was positive in 20 cases (26.66%), all the oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma were positive. A total of 8.27% of conventional clear cell renal cell carcinomas showed cytoplasmic positivity and one case of papillary renal cell carcinoma was positive. In chromophobe renal cell carcinoma c-kit was positive in the membrane and 44.44% showed combined staining. In oncocytoma four cases showed cytoplasmic positivity, with heterogeneous and less intense staining than chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION: c-kit is a useful marker for the diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma vs. other renal cell tumors. Also it is important to define the cell location, intensity, and percentage of neoplastic cells for the differential between chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma.