RESUMO
Identifying critical attributes for complex locally acting ophthalmic formulations and establishing in vitro-in vivo correlations can facilitate selection of appropriate thresholds for formulation changes that reflect lack of impact on in vivo performance. In this study the marketed antiglaucoma product Azopt® (1% brinzolamide suspension) and five other brinzolamide formulations varying in particle size distributions and apparent viscosities were topically administered in rabbits, and their ocular pharmacokinetics was determined in multiple ocular tissues. Statistical evaluation with ANOVA showed no significant differences between the formulations in the peak drug concentration (Cmax) in the aqueous humor and iris-ciliary body. As a post-hoc analysis, the within animal and total variability was determined for Cmax in the aqueous humor and iris-ciliary body. Based on the observed variability, we investigated the sample size needed for two types of study designs to observe statistically significant differences in Cmax. For the sample size calculations, assuming both 25% and 50% true differences in Cmax between two formulations, two study designs were compared: paired-eye dosing design (one formulation in one eye and another formulation in the other eye of the same animal at the same time) versus parallel-group design. The number of rabbits needed in the paired-eye dosing design are much lower than in the parallel-group design. For example, when the true difference in aqueous humor Cmax is 25%, nine rabbits are required in the paired-eye design versus seventy rabbits (35 per treatment) in the parallel-group design to observe a statistically significant difference with a power of 80%. Therefore, the proposed paired-eye dosing design is a viable option for the design of pharmacokinetic studies comparing ophthalmic products to determine the impact of formulation differences.
