RESUMO
Introduction: Cancer patients have significant levels of emotional distress. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) developed the distress management tool to quickly assess significant distress in oncological patients who require intervention. For its use in Colombia, we made its cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Objective: To determine the operative characteristics of the distress management tool, version 2.2018, in patients seen at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC) in Colombia. Materials and methods: Counting with the authorization from the NCCN, we translated, made the cross-cultural adaptation, and evaluated the operational characteristics of the tool. We included 343 cancer patients seen at the INC, who filled out the cross-culturally adapted instrument. A diagnostic test study was carried out with a semi-structured interview as a reference. Results: The patients had an average age of 49.7 years (SD=15) and the majority were women (67%). The instrument had an area under the ROC curve of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77 -0.86); its optimal cut-off point was 3.5 approached to 4 when using integers on the scale; its sensitivity was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76 - 0.85), and its specificity, 0.69 (95% CI: 0.64 - 0.74). The agreement percentage between the result of the interview and the instrument was 73% (kappa = 0.64; p< 0.001). Conclusions: The distress management tool allowed for the detection of moderate to severe distress requiring intervention and management. This instrument was adapted and validated in cancer patients in Colombia keeping the cutoff point at ≥ 4 as in the original version.
Introducción. Los pacientes con cáncer presentan niveles significativos de malestar emocional. La National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) desarrolló un instrumento (Distress Management) para evaluarlo de forma rápida en pacientes oncológicos. Para su utilización en Colombia, se hizo la adaptación transcultural y se validó. Objetivo. Determinar las características operativas del instrumento de malestar emocional, versión 2.2018, en pacientes atendidos en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Materiales y métodos. Previa autorización de la NCCN, se procedió a la traducción, adaptación transcultural y evaluación de las características operativas del instrumento. Se incluyeron 343 pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer atendidos en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, quienes diligenciaron el instrumento adaptado transculturalmente. Se efectuó un estudio de prueba diagnóstica como patrón de referencia mediante una entrevista semiestructurada. Resultados. Los pacientes tenían una edad promedio de 49,7 años (DE=15) y la mayoría (67 %) eran mujeres. El instrumento tuvo un área bajo la curva ROC de 0,81 (IC95% 0,77-0,86); el punto de corte óptimo fue de 3,5, el cual se aproximó a 4; la sensibilidad fue de 0,81 (IC95% 0,76-0,85) y la especificidad de 0,69 (IC95% 0,64-0,74). El porcentaje de acuerdo entre el resultado de la entrevista y el instrumento fue de 73 % (kappa=0,64; p<0,001). Conclusiones. El instrumento de malestar emocional permitió detectar el malestar emocional moderado a grave que requiere intervención y manejo. Este instrumento fue adaptado y validado en pacientes con cáncer en Colombia, conservándose el punto de corte en ≥4 como en la versión original.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Colômbia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Resumen | Introducción. Los pacientes con cáncer presentan niveles significativos de malestar emocional. La National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) desarrolló un instrumento (Distress Management) para evaluarlo de forma rápida en pacientes oncológicos. Para su utilización en Colombia, se hizo la adaptación transcultural y se validó. Objetivo. Determinar las características operativas del instrumento de malestar emocional, versión 2.2018, en pacientes atendidos en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Materiales y métodos. Previa autorización de la NCCN, se procedió a la traducción, adaptación transcultural y evaluación de las características operativas del instrumento. Se incluyeron 343 pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer atendidos en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, quienes diligenciaron el instrumento adaptado transculturalmente. Se efectuó un estudio de prueba diagnóstica como patrón de referencia mediante una entrevista semiestructurada. Resultados. Los pacientes tenían una edad promedio de 49,7 años (DE=15) y la mayoría (67 %) eran mujeres. El instrumento tuvo un área bajo la curva ROC de 0,81 (IC95% 0,77-0,86); el punto de corte óptimo fue de 3,5, el cual se aproximó a 4; la sensibilidad fue de 0,81 (IC95% 0,76-0,85) y la especificidad de 0,69 (IC95% 0,64-0,74). El porcentaje de acuerdo entre el resultado de la entrevista y el instrumento fue de 73 % (kappa=0,64; p<0,001). Conclusiones. El instrumento de malestar emocional permitió detectar el malestar emocional moderado a grave que requiere intervención y manejo. Este instrumento fue adaptado y validado en pacientes con cáncer en Colombia, conservándose el punto de corte en ≥4 como en la versión original.
Abstract | Introduction: Cancer patients have significant levels of emotional distress. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) developed the distress management tool to quickly assess significant distress in oncological patients who require intervention. For its use in Colombia, we made its cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Objective: To determine the operative characteristics of the distress management tool, version 2.2018, in patients seen at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC) in Colombia. Materials and methods: Counting with the authorization from the NCCN, we translated, made the cross-cultural adaptation, and evaluated the operational characteristics of the tool. We included 343 cancer patients seen at the INC, who filled out the cross-culturally adapted instrument. A diagnostic test study was carried out with a semi-structured interview as a reference. Results: The patients had an average age of 49.7 years (SD=15) and the majority were women (67%). The instrument had an area under the ROC curve of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77 - 0.86); its optimal cut-off point was 3.5 approached to 4 when using integers on the scale; its sensitivity was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76 - 0.85), and its specificity, 0.69 (95% CI: 0.64 - 0.74). The agreement percentage between the result of the interview and the instrument was 73% (kappa = 0.64; p< 0.001). Conclusions: The distress management tool allowed for the detection of moderate to severe distress requiring intervention and management. This instrument was adapted and validated in cancer patients in Colombia keeping the cutoff point at ≥ 4 as in the original version.
Assuntos
Entrevista Psiquiátrica Padronizada , Neoplasias , Comparação Transcultural , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estudo de Validação , Angústia PsicológicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment-related mortality and abandonment of therapy are major barriers to successful treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in the developing world. PROCEDURE: A collaboration was undertaken between Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia (Bogota, Colombia), which serves a poor patient population in an upper-middle income country, and Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center (Boston, USA). Several interventions aimed at reducing toxic deaths and abandonment were implemented, including a reduced-intensity treatment regimen and a psychosocial effort targeting abandonment. We performed a cohort study to assess impact. RESULTS: The Study Population comprised 99 children with ALL diagnosed between 2007 and 2010, and the Historic Cohort comprised 181 children treated prior to the study interventions (1995-2004). Significant improvements were achieved in the rate of deaths in complete remission (13% to 3%; P = 0.005), abandonment (32% to 9%; P < 0.001), and event-free survival with abandonment considered an event (47% to 65% at 2 years; P = 0.016). However, relapse rate did not improve. Medically unnecessary treatment delays were common, and landmark analysis revealed that initiating the PIII phase of therapy ≥4 weeks delayed predicted markedly inferior disease-free survival (P = 0.016). Conversely, patients who received therapy without excessive delays had outcomes approaching those achieved in high-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a twinning program was followed by reductions in abandonment and toxic deaths, but relapse rate did not improve. Inappropriate treatment delays were common and strongly predicted treatment failure. These findings highlight the importance of adherence to treatment schedule for effective therapy of ALL.
