Energy devices versus electrocoagulation in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a propensity-match cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the effect on perioperative outcome of intraoperative use of different devices for tissue dissection (electrocoagulation [EC] or energy devices [ED]) in patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for lung cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 191 consecutive patients who underwent VATS lobectomy, divided into two cohorts: ED (117 patients), and EC (74 patients); after propensity score matching, 148 patients were extracted, 74 for each cohort. The primary endpoints considered were complication rate and 30-day mortality rate. The secondary endpoints considered were length of stay (LOS) and the number of lymph nodes harvested. RESULTS: The complication rate did not differ between the two cohorts (16.22% EC group, 19.66% ED group, P=0.549), before and after propensity matching (16.22% for both EC and ED group, P=1.000). The 30-day mortality rate was 1 in the overall population. Median LOS was 5 days for both groups, before and after propensity match, with the same interquartile range, (IQR: 4-8). ED group had a significantly higher median number of lymph nodes harvested (ED median: 18, IQR: 12-24; EC median: 10, IQR: 5-19; P=0.0002). The difference was confirmed after the propensity score matching (ED median: 17, IQR: 13-23; EC median: 10, IQR: 5-19; P=0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: ED dissection during VATS lobectomy did not lead to different complication rates, mortality rates, and LOS compared to EC tissue dissection. ED use led to a significantly higher number of intraoperative lymph nodes harvested compared to EC use.

Correlation between high-resolution computed tomography appearance and histopathological features in the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases. A real-life study.

BACKGROUND: According to current guidelines, a surgical biopsy is rarely required when a high-confidence radiologic interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnosis is made on thin-section high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Nevertheless, disowning HRCT scans diagnosed by biopsy are more common than presumed. Our study aimed to describe the concordance rate between HRCT scans and pathological diagnoses of ILDs obtained by surgical biopsy. The current guideline suggests the use of surgical lung biopsy (SLB) in patients with newly detected ILD of unknown cause. METHODS: Patients who underwent mini-invasive surgical biopsies for interstitial lung diseases from January 2018 to August 2022 were analyzed. The HRCT scans were reviewed by an observer blinded to the patient's clinical information. The concordance between histological and HRCT-scan were assessed. RESULTS: Data from 104 patients with uncertain low confidence diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases at HRCT were analyzed. Most of the patients are male (65; 62.5%). The more frequent HRCT pattern were: alternative diagnoses (46; 44.23%), UIP probable (42; 40.38%), UIP indeterminate (7; 6.73%), and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (9, 8.65%). The more common histological diagnosis was UIP definite (30; 28.84%), hypersensitivity pneumonia [HP](19; 18.44%), NSIP (15; 14.42%), sarcoidosis (10; 9.60%). In 7 (20%) cases, the final pathological finding denies HRCT-scans diagnoses; indeed, a moderate agreement was observed between HRCT-scan findings and the definitive histological diagnosis (kappa index: 0.428). CONCLUSIONS: HRCT-scan has limitations if the objective is to define interstitial lung diseases accurately. Consequently, pathological assessment should be taken into account in order to provide more accurate tailored treatment strategies because the risk is to wait from 12 to 24 months to ascertain if the ILD will be treatable as progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). Undeniably true, video-assisted surgical lung biopsy (VASLB) with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation is associated with a risk of mortality and morbidity that is far from nil. Nevertheless, in recent years a VASLB approach performed in awake subjects under loco-regional anesthesia (awake-VASLB) has been suggested as an effective method to obtain a highly confident diagnosis in patients with diffuse pathologies of the lung parenchyma.

Clinical score for colorectal cancer patients with lung-limited metastases undergoing surgical resection: Meta-Lung Score.

BACKGROUND: Radical resection of isolated lung metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is debated. Like Fong's criteria in liver metastases, our study was meant to assign a clinical prognostic score in patients with LM from CRC, aiming for better surgery selection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 260 CRC patients who underwent curative LM resection from December 2002 to January 2022, verifying the impact of different clinicopathological features on the overall survival (OS). RESULTS: At the univariate analysis: higher baseline CEA levels (p = 0.0001), disease-free survival less than or equal to 12 months (m) (p = 0.0043), LM size larger than 2 cm (p = 0.0187), multiple resectable nodules (p = 0.0083), and positive nodal status of the primary tumor (p = 0.0011) were associated with worse prognosis. In a Cox regression model, these characteristics retained their independent role for OS (p < 0.0001) and were chosen as criteria to be assigned one point each for clinical risk score. The 5-year survival rate in patients with 0 points was 88%, while no patients with a 5-point score survived at 2 years. Based on the 0-1 vs. 2-5 score range, we obtained a significant difference in median OS: not reached vs. 40.8 months (95 %CI 36 to 87.5), respectively (p < 0.0001) stratifying patients into good and poor prognosis. The prognostic role of the score was also confirmed in terms of median RFS: not reached in 0-1 scored patients vs. 30.5 months (95 %CI 19.4 to 42) in patients with 2-5 scores (p = 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: When LM from CRC is resectable, the Meta-Lung Score provides valuable prognostic information. Indeed, while upfront surgery should be considered in patients with scores of 0 to 1, it should be cautiously suggested in patients with scores of 2 to 5, for whom a prognosis comparison between preventive surgery and other treatments should be investigated in prospective randomized clinical trials.

All-in-one diagnostic and therapeutic precision thoracic surgery using a hybrid operating theatre: the triple-marking technique.

BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive management of sub-centimetric and often sub-solid lung lesions is quite challenging for thoracic surgeons. As a matter of fact, thoracoscopic wedge resection can often require conversion to thoracotomy when pulmonary lesions cannot be visually identified. Hybrid operating rooms (ORs) can serve as a helpful tool in a multidisciplinary setting, providing real-time lesion imaging and targeting, allowing preoperative or intraoperative percutaneous placement of different lesions targeting techniques to help locate non-palpable lung nodules during video-assisted thoracic surgery. The aim of the study is to assess whether the lung nodule marking using methylene blue, indocyanine green, and gold seeds - the "triple-marking technique" - in the hybrid OR is effective in helping locate non-visible or palpable nodules. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on 19 patients with non-palpable lung lesions requiring VATS wedge resection and underwent lesional targeting in the hybrid operating room with different marking systems, including gold seeds placement, methylene blue, or indocyanine green. Lesions were considered non-palpable due to sizing, radiological subsolid aspect, or location and then identified using intraoperative CT scans, also allowing to elaborate needle trajectory. The intraoperative diagnosis was obtained in all of the patients guiding the type of surgery performed. RESULTS: The radio-opaque gold seed marker was used in all of the patients except for two cases that developed intraprocedural pneumothoraces with no major consequences. In these patients, the nodule marking using dyes was still performed and successful in allowing to locate the lesion. Methylene blue and indocyanine green were always used in combination during the dye-targeting phase. Methylene blue appeared to be non-visible in two patients. The indocyanine green was correctly visualized in every patient. We observed the gold seed dislocation in two patients. We were able to identify the lung lesion in all the patients correctly. No conversion was needed. No allergic reactions were observed due to dye administration, and no prophylaxis was performed prior to lesional marking. The lung lesions were visually identified in 100% of the patients thanks to at least one marking technique. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience confirms that the hybrid operating room can represent a suitable tool in helping locate hard-to-find lung lesions in planned VATS resections. Using different techniques, a multiple marking approach seems advisable to maximize the lung lesions detecting rate by direct vision, therefore reducing the VATS conversion rate.