No need to modify treatment within the first month after rapid start of a tailored antiretroviral therapy: the TWODAY Study.

The aim of the TWODAY Study was to investigate the frequency of early treatment change after rapid start of a tailored ART regimen (a 2-drug regimen - 2DR, when clinically feasible or a 3-drug regimen - 3DR, otherwise). TWODAY was an open-label, prospective, proof-of-concept, single center study. ART-naïve patients started their first-line regimen within a few days from the first laboratory testing with a 2DR of dolutegravir (DTG) and lamivudine (3TC) if CD4+ count >200 cells/mL, HIVRNA <500,000 copies/mL, no transmitted drug resistance to DTG or 3TC and HBsAg undetectable; otherwise, ART was started with a 3DR. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who needed to change ART within four week from start, for any reason. Thirty-two patients were enrolled; 19 (59.3%) were deemed eligible for a 2DR. Median time from laboratory testing to ART start was 5 days (5; 5). No regimen modification occurred within one month. In conclusion, no regimen modification was needed within the first month of treatment. Starting a 2DR within a few days after HIV diagnosis was feasible, relying upon complete results of the needed laboratory tests (including resistance testing). A 2DR can be safely proposed provided full laboratory tests are readily available.

SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM Rapid Test as a Diagnostic Tool in Hospitalized Patients and Healthcare Workers, at a large Teaching Hospital in northern Italy, during the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic.

We describe the outcome of a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG/IgM rapid test, and discuss the potential suitability of antibody testing. Retrospective single cohort study on patients with suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and asymptomatic Healthcare Workers, enrolled from March to April 2020. Subjects had quantitative PCR (qPCR) test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 via nasal swab and serological testing using the COVID-19 IgG/ IgM Rapid Test (PRIMA Lab SA) immunochromatographic assay. Some subjects underwent chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) after rapid test. The aim of the study was to analyse the proportion of those who developed a positive IgM/IgG response for SARS-CoV-2. The correspondence between the results from rapid testing and CLIA, when available, was evaluated. 97 subjects underwent qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 through nasal swab, which resulted positive in 40/43 (93.0%) of symptomatic patients, 2/40 (5%) of asymptomatic HCW, in no subjects with suspected COVID- 19 (clinical and radiological findings) then excluded by repeated nasal swabs and alternative diagnosis (COVID-19-negative patients, CNPs), and in 6/6 (100%) of patients with confirmed diagnosis and negative follow-up nasal swabs (COVID-19-recovered patients, CRPs). IgM resulted positive in 8/43 (18.6%) of symptomatic patients and in 1/6 (16.7%) of CRPs. IgG resulted positive in 36/43 (83.7%) of symptomatic patients, 2/40 (5%) of HCW, and in 1/8 (12.5%) and 6/6 (100%) of CNPs and CRPs, respectively. A comparison between an IgG/IgM Rapid Test and a following CLIA test showed consistency in negative results in 25/28 of HCW and 8/8 of CNPs tested. Our preliminary data support the role of IgG/IgM Rapid Test (PRIMA Lab SA) immunochromatographic assay as a point-of-care test that may complement molecular tests in the screening of SARS-CoV-2 carriers. The test may gain particular relevance in shortening the time needed to refer patients to a COVID or non-COVID Hospital area and to achieve diagnosis in patients with persistently negative nasal swabs.

Immune response to hepatitis B vaccination in HIV-positive individuals with isolated antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen: Results of a prospective Italian study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) are found in 14-44% of patients with HIV infection, but it is still unclear whether hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination should be recommended for HIV-positive subjects with isolated anti-HBc (IAHBc). We examined the rate of anamnestic and primary responses (ARs and PRs) and associated factors in a group of HIV-infected patients with an IAHBc profile. METHODS: This prospective study recruited 25 HIV-positive patients with anti-HBc alone who were vaccinated against HBV infection. Those without an AR (anti-hepatitis B envelope antigen [anti-HBs] levels of <10 U/L) or who were hypo-responsiveness (anti-HBs levels of >10 but <100 U/L) four weeks after the first dose of vaccine underwent a full course of vaccinations. Their clinical and virological data, including the presence of occult hepatitis B infection (OBI), were evaluated in accordance with the vaccination schedule. RESULTS: Six of the 25 patients (24%) showed an AR, four of whom had anti-HBs levels of <100 U/L. Ten of 19 (52.6%) remaining patients became seroprotected after the third dose. OBI was detected in four of the six patients with an AR, two of the 10 patients with a PR, and none of the nine patients who did not respond. Multivariate analysis showed that an AR was associated with the presence of OBI (P = 0.0162), and a PR was associated with HCV antibody status. (P = 0.0191). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that testing for anti-HBc alone may not be a reliable means of assessing protection from HBV infection in HIV-positive patients. OBI-positive patients may benefit from a single vaccine dose. Anti-HCV serostatus may affect PRs.

Sustained virological response after ten days of triple anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy with telaprevir plus pegylated interferon and ribavirin in an HIV/HCV co-infected cirrhotic woman.

The introduction of first-generation protease inhibitors for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in subjects infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 has significantly improved the sustained virological response (SVR) rate. As liver cirrhosis reduces the probability of achieving SVR, current guidelines discourage response-guided therapy in cirrhotic patients. We report the first case of a cirrhotic woman with chronic HCV and HIV co-infection achieving virological response after an ultra-short course of therapy. A 40-year-old HIV/HCV co-infected woman with compensated liver cirrhosis was treated with anti-HCV triple therapy containing telaprevir plus pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Baseline plasma HCV RNA was 3.6 log IU/ml and transaminases were within the normal range. She harboured IL28B rs12979860C/C alleles. Ten days after starting therapy, the patient stopped treatment because of mild anorexia and nausea. Virological response was detected at treatment discontinuation and was maintained up to 24 weeks. This case describes an unexpected SVR after a 10-day course of antiviral therapy in a cirrhotic HIV/HCV co-infected woman presenting positive predictive factors for a response (low viral load, IL28B genotype). Nonetheless, there is no evidence to suggest a shorter duration of treatment in this subset of patients.

Immune recovery and T cell subset analysis during effective treatment with maraviroc.

OBJECTIVES: Patients treated with maraviroc frequently show high CD4+ T cell increases. The aim of this study was to detail the characteristics of maraviroc-induced immune recovery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied T cell subsets from frozen peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients treated with raltegravir, etravirine and either maraviroc (REM, n = 24) or darunavir/ritonavir (RED, n = 17). RESULTS: The two groups showed a similar decrease in activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. A greater loss of naive CD4+ T cells and a reduction in cells expressing CXCR4 were observed in REM patients, while RED patients showed a greater loss of cells expressing CCR5. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support a role for reduction in activated T cell subsets to explain the greater maraviroc-induced immune recovery. Reduction in CXCR4+CD4+ and higher expression of CCR5+CD4+ T cells might represent a potential protection from non-R5 tropic viral strain overgrowth.