Is letrozole needed for controlled ovarian stimulation in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the advantages and disadvantages of using letrozole for controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) in young patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, wishing to cryopreserve oocytes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Sixteen Italian units for reproductive medicine and in vitro fertilization. METHODS: Data of 50 ER+ breast cancer patients undergoing COH to cryopreserve oocytes before gonadotoxic chemotherapy with a letrozole plus gonadotropins (Le+Gn) protocol were compared with those of 25 young women with ER- breast cancer, submitted to COH using a protocol with gonadotropins alone (Gn-only). RESULTS: The Le+Gn protocol implied a significantly lower total Gn consumption and allowed to maintain significantly lower circulating E2 levels at all checkpoints throughout stimulation (peak E2 value 446 ± 357 versus 1553 ± 908 pg/ml, respectively; p = 0.001). On the other side, the Le+Gn protocol allowed a significantly lower yield of oocytes available for cryostorage (6.6 ± 3.5 versus 8 ± 5, respectively; p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: In breast cancer patients, the association of letrozole to Gn significantly reduces the number of oocytes available for cryostorage in comparison with the use of Gn alone. On the other side, it is associated with significantly lower E2 levels during the whole stimulation cycle, a safety issue that has been traditionally considered advantageous in case of ER+ cancers.

In vitro culture of mouse embryos reduces differential gene expression between inner cell mass and trophectoderm.

Differences in gene expression and imprinting have been reported, comparing in vivo versus in vitro generated preimplantation embryos. Furthermore, mouse studies have shown that placenta development is altered following in vitro culture. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these findings are unknown. We therefore isolated trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) cells from in vivo and in vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos and evaluated their transcriptome using microarrays. We found that the transcriptomes of in vitro produced ICM and TE cells showed remarkably few differences compared to ICM and TE cells of in vivo generated embryos. In vitro fertilization embryos showed a reduced number of TE cells compared to in vivo embryos. In addition, TE of IVF embryos showed significant downregulation of solute transporter genes and of genes involved in placenta formation (Eomesodermin, Socs3) or implantation (Hbegf). In summary, IVF and embryo culture significantly affects the transcriptome of ICM and TE cells.

Effect of the method of conception and embryo transfer procedure on mid-gestation placenta and fetal development in an IVF mouse model.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal placentation is a potential mechanism to explain the increased incidence of low birthweight observed after IVF. This study evaluates, in a mouse model, whether the method of conception and embryo transfer affect placentation and fetal development. METHODS: IVF blastocysts (CF1 x B6D2F1/J) were cultured in Whitten's medium (IVF(WM), n = 55) or K modified simplex optimized medium with amino acids (IVF(KAA), n = 56). Embryos were transferred to the uteri of pseudo-pregnant recipients. Two control groups were created: unmanipulated embryos produced by natural mating (in vivo group, n = 64) and embryos produced by natural mating that were flushed from uterus and immediately transferred to pseudo-pregnant recipients (flushed blastocysts, FB group, n = 57). At gestation age 12.5 days, implantation sites were collected and fixed; fetuses and placentas were weighed and their developmental stage (DS) evaluated. Placental areas and vascular volume fractions were calculated; parametric statistics were applied as appropriate. RESULTS: IVF fetuses showed a modest but significant delay in development compared with FB mice (P < 0.05). In addition, IVF conceptuses were consistently smaller than FB (P < 0.05). Importantly, these differences persisted when analyzing fetuses of similar DS. The placenta/fetus ratio was larger in the IVF group (IVF(WM) 0.95; IVF(KAA) = 0.90) than the FB group (0.72) (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Gross morphology of the placenta and ratio labyrinth/fetal area were equivalent in the IVF and FB groups, as were percentage of fetal blood vessels, maternal blood spaces and trophoblastic components. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro embryo culture affects fetal and placental development; this could explain the lower birthweight in IVF offspring.