Does race influence survival for esophageal cancer patients treated on the radiation and chemotherapy arm of RTOG #85-01?

PURPOSE: In reported retrospective non-randomized trials of treatment of esophageal carcinoma, blacks have a lower survival from esophageal cancer than whites. None of these studies has accounted for the extent of disease, or the methods and quality of treatment. We reviewed the data that included only patients treated on the chemoradiation arm of the RTOG-8501 esophageal carcinoma trial to see if there were differences in overall survival between black and white patients receiving the same standard of care. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred-nineteen patients, 37 blacks and 82 whites were evaluated who met the criteria for receiving chemoradiation of 5000 cGy and four courses of Cisplatin (75 mg/m2) and Fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2 for 4 days). RESULTS: Blacks had squamous histology only, with 86% of blacks having weight loss of 10 lbs. or more compared to 56% of whites (p = 0.001). In addition, blacks had larger tumors and more difficulty eating (p = 0.010). Overall, there was no difference in the Kaplan-Meier median survival estimate by race (p = 0.2757). Only when we limited the analysis to the "squamous histology" subgroup, stratified according to age >70 vs. <70 years (p = 0.0002), and nodal status (p = 0.0177) in a Cox regression model analysis, did race appear to be a significant factor (p = 0.0012). However, using the entire database, the age effect was found to be a "bimodal" effect, wherein the "youngest" (< age 60 years) and "oldest" patients (age > 70 years) did poorly. Because of the dramatic differences in the age and histology distributions between blacks and whites, this issue could not be resolved in the subset of squamous only who received chemoradiation. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma among white patients without a corresponding increase of this histology in blacks reflects a difference in diet and or lifestyle compared to blacks that deserves additional study. When treated aggressively with chemoradiation, race did not appear to be a statistically significant factor for overall survival.

Androgen suppression plus radiation versus radiation alone for patients with D1 (pN+) adenocarcinoma of the prostate (results based on a national prospective randomized trial, RTOG 85-31). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of immediate androgen suppression in conjunction with standard external beam irradiation vs. radiation alone on a group of pathologically staged lymph node-positive patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A national prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-31) of standard external beam irradiation plus immediate androgen suppression vs. external beam irradiation alone was initiated in 1985 for patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate. One hundred seventy-three of the patients in this trial had biopsy-proven pathologically involved lymph nodes. Ninety-eight of these patients received radiation plus the immediate androgen suppression (LHRH agonist), while 75 received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation instituted at the time of relapse. RESULTS: With a median followup of 4.9 years, estimated progression-free survival with PSA < 1.5 ng/ml at 5 years was 55% for the patients who received radiation plus immediate LHRH agonist vs. 11% of the patients who received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation at relapse (p = 0.0001). Because all of these patients had locally advanced disease (i.e., pathologically positive lymph nodes), stage does not explain this difference in outcome, and Gleason grade was not statistically different between the two groups. Estimated absolute survival at 5 years for the radiation and LHRH group was 73 vs. 65% for the radiation alone group who received androgen suppression at relapse. Estimated disease-specific survival at 5 years was 82% for the radiation and immediate LHRH agonist group and 77% for the radiation-alone group. CONCLUSION: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate and pathologically involved pelvic lymph nodes (pN+ or clinical stage D1) should be seriously considered for external beam irradiation plus immediate hormonal manipulation over radiation alone with hormonal manipulation at the time of relapse.

Survival improvement in anaplastic astrocytoma, combining external radiation with halogenated pyrimidines: final report of RTOG 86-12, Phase I-II study.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the toxicity and tumor efficacy of the halopyrimidine IUdR as a chemical modifier of radiation response in patients with malignant glioma. The preliminary results published in 1993 demonstrated no real advantage in the group of patients with glioblastoma. However, a benefit appeared to be evolving in the group of patients with Anaplastic Astrocytoma (AA). We are now presenting the results on the long-term follow-up of patients with AA. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between August 1987 and October 1991, 79 patients were entered in a prospective study with newly diagnosed malignant glioma. Twenty-one of 79 were AA. The study was designed to have a fixed dose of radiation consisting of 60.16 Gy in 32 fractions in 6.5 weeks but varying the dose schedule of IUdR, delivered in a continuous intravenous infusion of long (96 h) or short (48 and 24 h) duration, every week for the 6.5 weeks of radiation treatment. RESULTS: The last AA patient was entered in March 1991. Ninety-five percent of the AA patients were under 59 years of age and 86% had a Karnofsky score 80. Thirty-eight percent had a tumor diameter of less than 5 cm and 52% had a tumor diameter between 5-10 cm. Seventy-six percent had partial or total tumor resection. The toxicity of this treatment was acceptable and has already been published elsewhere. At the time of this report, 14 out of 21 patients with AA are dead. The median survival, calculated from the Kaplan-Meier, is 3.2 years. Thirty-three percent of the patients have survived 5 years. These results compare favorably with the best results reported in the literature with postoperative external radiation plus chemotherapy, median survival time (MST) of 3 years, and previous Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) experience with radiation alone, MST of 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings in patients with AA corroborate the improved therapeutic results published recently when combining external radiation with "long" infusion of i.v. BUdR and indicate the need to proceed with randomized Phase III studies utilizing halogenated pyrimidines and radiation. One such study has already been activated, RTOG # 94-04.

Results of a phase II trial of external beam radiation with etanidazole (SR 2508) for the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer (RTOG Protocol 90-20).

PURPOSE: RTOG Protocol 90-20 was designed to evaluate the effect of the hypoxic cell sensitizer Etanidazole (SR-2508) on locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with concurrent external beam irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate with locally advanced T2b, T3, and T4 tumors were eligible for this study. No patients with disease beyond the pelvis were eligible. Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) was mandatory. All patients received definitive external beam irradiation using standard four-field whole pelvis treatment to 45-50 Gy, followed by a cone down with a minimum total dose to the prostate of 66 Gy at 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction over 6.5-7.5 weeks. Etanidazole was delivered 1.8 g/m2 given 3 times a week to a total of 34.2 g/m2 or 19 doses. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were entered onto the study. Three patients refused treatment; therefore, 36 patients were eligible for further evaluation. Median follow-up was 36.9 months from treatment end. All patients had elevated initial PSA levels, and 18 patients had PSAs of > 20 ng/ml. Tumor classification was T2, 12 patients (33.3%); T3, 22 patients (61.1%); and T4, 2 patients (5.6%). Complete clinical response, defined as PSA < 4 ng/ml and complete clinical disappearance, was attained in 17.9% of (5/28 pts) with information at 90 days and 56% of patients by 12 months following treatment. Relapse-free survival was 13% at 3 years with PSA < 4 ng/ml. There were no Grade 4 or 5 toxicities, either acute (during treatment) or in follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this trial regarding PSA response and clinical disappearance of disease are similar to historical controls and do not warrant further investigation of etanidazole as was done in this trial. Drug toxicity that, in the past, has been unacceptably high with other hypoxic cell sensitizers does not appear to be a significant problem with this drug.