Enabling the Rational Design of Low-Fat Snack Foods: Insights from In Vitro Oral Processing.

Texture perception is conceptualized as an emergent cognitive response to food characteristics that comprise several physical and chemical properties. Contemporary oral processing research focuses on revealing the relationship between the sensory perceptions and food properties, with the goal of enabling rational product design. One major challenge is associated with revealing the complex molecular and biocolloidal interactions underpinning even simple texture percepts. Here, we introduce in vitro oral processing, which considers oral processing in terms of discrete units of operation (first bite, comminution, granulation, bolus formation, and tribology). Within this framework, we systematically investigate the material properties that govern each specific oral processing unit operation without being impacted by the biological complexity of the oral environment. We describe how this framework was used to rationally design a low-fat potato chip with improved sensory properties by investigating the impact from adding back, to a low-fat potato chip, a small amount of oil mixed with the surface-active agent polyglycerol polyricinoleate (PGPR). The relevance of instrumental measures is validated by sensory assessment, whereby panelists ranked the perceived oiliness of three different types of potato chips. The sensory results indicate that perceived oiliness was higher when a low-fat potato chip was supplemented with an additional 0.5% (w/w) topical coating (the coating comprised 15%, w/w, PGPR in oil) compared to the unaltered low-fat potato chip. The perceived difference in oiliness is hypothesized to correspond to the dynamic friction measured in vitro with a saliva-coated substrate in the presence and absence of PGPR. The study illustrates how dividing oral processing into distinct units provides a rational approach to food product design focused on controlling key sensory attributes.

You eat with your eyes first.

While the senses of taste, smell, and vision are distinct, visual stimuli have been shown to alter the perception of taste, smell, and flavor. Color may be the most obvious visual cue, but expectations through learned associations are set by other visual cues as well, including gloss, evenness, and shape. These expectations exert cognitive top-down influences that can and sometimes do alter assessments of taste and flavor.

Individual differences in perceived bitterness predict liking of sweeteners.

Although recent molecular studies suggest that only one receptor and one signaling pathway are involved in the perception of sweetness, this seems to contradict everyday experience that people not only have different likes and dislikes of certain sweeteners but also perceive the sweeteners differently. One possible explanation is that variation in liking of sweeteners is due, in part, to variation across individuals in sensitivity to nonsweet tastes, such as bitterness, which are transduced by a variety of receptors. Fifty individuals were asked to rate intensities of several taste attributes of 10 sweeteners and to give hedonic assessments of each sweetener. Additionally, their sensitivity to 6-n-propyl-3-thiouracil (PROP) was determined. Results indicated that when matched for sweetness, the perception of bitterness and the sweetener compound were the 2 largest factors contributing to overall liking of a sweetener. Sensitivity to PROP did not contribute significantly to the model.