Osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease care in systemic lupus erythematosus according to new quality indicators.

OBJECTIVES: Quality indicators (QIs) for the assessment of care of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been proposed. We evaluated care according to these proposed QIs for osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with SLE in our rheumatology practice. METHODS: We selected 200 patients with SLE according to American College of Rheumatology Criteria and ≥2 visits to our practice in 2007 to 2008. We performed a structured medical record review and collected demographics, SLE and past medical history, medications, laboratories and data concerning osteoporosis, and CVD management. We employed univariable analyses and multivariable regression analyses to test for factors associated with care meeting the proposed QIs. RESULTS: Ninety-four percent of patients were female and 64% were white. Mean age was 46.3 years and mean lupus duration was 15.3 years. Twenty-nine percent were taking ≥7.5 mg prednisone per day for ≥3 months. The proportions of patients for whom care met the proposed QIs were as follows: 59% for bone mineral density testing, 62% for calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and 86% for antiresorptive or anabolic osteoporosis medications. Only 3% had 5 cardiac risk factors assessed within the year and 26% had 4 cardiac risk factors assessed annually. Smoking, fasting lipid panels, and diabetes mellitus were rarely assessed annually. Having a primary care physician within our health care network increased care meeting QIs. CONCLUSIONS: Care according to newly proposed QIs for osteoporosis and CVD was suboptimal in our academic center. To standardize and improve care of patients with SLE, we suggest specific changes to the proposed QIs.

Disparities in lupus care and outcomes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an inflammatory rheumatic disease characterized by autoantibody production and diverse clinical manifestations, disproportionately affects vulnerable groups: women, racial and ethnic minorities, the poor and those lacking medical insurance and education. We summarize the current knowledge of the disparities observed in SLE and highlight recent research that aims to dissect the causes of these disparities and identify the potentially modifiable factors contributing to them. RECENT FINDINGS: Several remediable causes, including lack of education, self-efficacy and access to quality, experienced healthcare have been found to contribute to observed disparities in SLE prevalence and outcomes. SUMMARY: SLE is associated with alarming disparities in incidence, severity and outcomes. The causes of these disparities are under study by several research groups. Identifying potentially correctable contributory factors should allow the development of effective strategies to improve the healthcare delivery and outcomes in all SLE patients.