The Effect of Gracilis Tendon Preservation on Postoperative Knee Joint Stability and Muscle Strength in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.

The aim of our study is to evaluate preserving gracilis tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery and its effect to the flexion of the knee joint and tibial internal rotation strength and the stability of the knee. Patients who underwent primary single-bundle arthroscopic ACLR using all-inside technique and using hamstring tendon autograft were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups as gracilis preserved (St) and gracilis harvested (StG) groups. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Knee-related quality of life (KOOS-QOL) score, ACL-Return to Sport after Injury scale score were used to evaluate as postoperative functional scores at last follow-up. Anterior tibial translation was evaluated using the KT-1000 device. Knee joint flexion, extension, and internal rotation strength were evaluated using isokinetic dynamometer. Dynamic balance performances were measured using the Biodex Balance System. There were 24 patients in the St group and 23 patients in the StG group. Demographic data and clinical results showed no significant difference. Anteroposterior movement of the tibia was found to be significantly higher in the StG group than in the St group in measurements at 89 and 134 N, respectively (p = 0.01 and <0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between both standard and deep flexor and extensor and internal rotator strength. No statistically significant difference was found in the amount of total, anteroposterior, and mediolateral balance deficit between the two groups. Additional gracilis harvesting does not have a negative effect on both standard and deep knee flexion, and tibial internal rotation strength compared with the St group. Although semitendinosus and StG group showed significantly more anterior tibial translation, there was no significant difference in clinical and dynamic stability measurements.

Intra- and inter-observer reliability of Dias-Tachdjian classification in pediatric ankle fractures: do clinical experience and expertise matter?

The Dias-Tachdjian classification is the most commonly used system for the classification of pediatric ankle fractures, but its inter- and intra-observer reliability has not been studied in detail. Also, the impact of the clinician's experience and expertise on the reliability of this system is unknown. This study aimed: (1) to determine the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Dias-Tachdjian classification and (2) to investigate the effect of the clinician's experience and expertise on the reliability of this system. Anteroposterior and lateral ankle radiographs of 56 children (34 male, 22 female) with ankle fractures, aged between 3 and 14 years, with open growth cartilages, were retrospectively identified and included in the study. Each patient radiograph was examined by 10 observers from two different specialties with different levels of clinical experience (two orthopedic surgeons with interest in pediatric orthopedics, three orthopedic surgeons with no interest in pediatric orthopedics, three orthopedic residents, and two radiology specialists) from two different specialties (orthopedics and radiology). All observers were then asked to classify pediatric ankle fractures at 6-week intervals per the Dias-Tachdjian classification system. Overall, intra-observer reliability as substantial to very good (κ = 0.77-0.95, P < 0.01), but inter-observer reliability as fair for both assessments (κ = 0.21, P < 0.01 and κ = 0.20, P < 0.01 for the first and second occasions, respectively). Inter-observer reliability among pediatric orthopedic surgeons as very good (κ = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.86-0.94, P < 0.01 and κ = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.71-0.93, P < 0.01 for the first and second occasions, respectively). Orthopedic surgeons with no special interest in pediatric orthopedics demonstrated substantial agreement in the first occasion (κ = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.53-0.72, P < 0.01) but moderate in the second one. Orthopedic residents exhibited moderate levels of agreement in each assessment period (κ = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.47-0.68, P < 0.01 and κ = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.37-0.51, P < 0.01 for the first and second occasion, respectively). Considering that the specialists dealing with pediatric orthopedics show very good consistency for Dias-Tachdjian classification, both within and between observers, consistency in the identification of the ankle fracture models increases as the interest in the field of pediatric orthopedics intensifies.