Diagnostic and Prognostic Ability of Pancreatic Stone Protein: A Scoping Review.

Pancreatic stone protein (PSP) is an acute-phase reactant mainly produced in response to stress. Its diagnostic and prognostic accuracy for several types of infection has been studied in several clinical settings. The aim of the current review was to assess all studies examining a possible connection of pancreatic stone protein levels with the severity and possible complications of patients diagnosed with infection. We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov to identify original clinical studies assessing the role of pancreatic stone protein in the diagnosis and prognosis of infectious diseases. We identified 22 eligible studies. Ten of them provided diagnostic aspects, ten studies provided prognostic aspects, and another two studies provided both diagnostic and prognostic information. The majority of the studies were performed in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting, five studies were on patients who visited the emergency department (ED), and three studies were on burn-injury patients. According to the literature, pancreatic stone protein has been utilized in patients with different sites of infection, including pneumonia, soft tissue infections, intra-abdominal infections, urinary tract infections, and sepsis. In conclusion, PSP appears to be a useful point-of-care biomarker for the ED and ICU due to its ability to recognize bacterial infections and sepsis early. Further studies are required to examine PSP's kinetics and utility in specific populations and conditions.

Presepsin in the diagnosis of sepsis.

OBJECTIVES: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition characterized by organ dysfunction. It occurs due to the host's dysregulated response to an infection. Clinicians use inflammatory biomarkers to evaluate patients at risk of sepsis in various settings. METHODS: We included studies focusing on the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin in patients under suspicion of sepsis. The bivariate model of Reitsma was used for the quantitative synthesis, and summary estimates were calculated. The Zhou-Dendukuri approach was followed to assess heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were performed based on settings and diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: The summary sensitivity for diagnosing sepsis was 0.805 (95 % CI: 0.759-0.844), while the false positive rate (FPR) was 0.174 (95 % CI: 0.124-0.239). The area under the curve (AUC) for the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.875, with a slightly lower partial AUC of 0.833. The analysis using the Zhou-Dendukuri approach revealed low heterogeneity (I2 = 15.9 %). Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in SROC curves and summary estimates between the ED and ICU settings, although the ED subgroup exhibited higher heterogeneity (I2 = 52.7 % vs. 20.2 %). The comparison between the diagnostic criteria, Sepsis 1 and Sepsis 3, demonstrated similar summary estimates and SROC curves. The examination of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool revealed a high risk of bias regarding the participants and their applicability. Also, there was an increased risk of bias in all the studies concerning the index test. CONCLUSION: Based on our research, presepsin is a promising biomarker for triage and early diagnosis of sepsis.