Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 127(5): 589-92, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12708903

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining malignancies that occur in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the demographics and pathologic features associated with these malignancies have not been completely defined. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the age of onset of malignant disease in patients seropositive for HIV and in control patients presumed to be negative for HIV, but with the same primary site. We compare the demographics and histopathology for both groups. DESIGN: From 1993 to 1997, 57 cases involving HIV-positive patients with malignancies from 16 primary sites were recorded in the Cancer Registry files at Bellevue Hospital; 519 cases involving patients negative for HIV were recorded during this same period. We compared the age at diagnosis, sex, race, tumor histology, stage, and grade between these 2 groups. RESULTS: The average age of HIV-positive patients was 47.6 years, compared with 60.3 years in the control group (P <.001). When the 16 cancer sites were compared individually, HIV-positive patients were significantly younger at onset of lung (HIV-positive patients/control group) (19/245), skin (11/77), penile (3/5), laryngeal (3/18), tongue (5/16), and colorectal (2/38) carcinomas. Patients infected with HIV had a more frequent history of smoking (41/328; P =.04) and illicit drug use (30/49; P <.001). The HIV-positive patients also were found to have a lower clinical stage of disease, compared with controls, largely due to the higher prevalence of stage 0 tumors (13/46; P =.01). CONCLUSIONS: The finding of younger age at diagnosis in HIV-positive compared to presumed HIV-negative patients may be related in part to earlier detection, as well as preexisting immunosuppression. The specific sites for which a significant difference in age between the HIV-positive and control cases was observed may be related to the mechanisms of immunosurveillance in parts of the body that have ready access to the outside environment. Knowledge of younger age of onset for these malignancies should prompt closer physical examination of these sites by clinicians.


Assuntos
Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/virologia , Distribuição por Idade , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Laríngeas/virologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Penianas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Penianas/virologia , Grupos Raciais , Distribuição por Sexo , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/virologia , Neoplasias da Língua/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Língua/virologia
3.
Prev Med ; 35(3): 250-7, 2002 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12202067

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We set out to examine which treatment option available in the United States was most cost-effective in treating children with endemic group A streptococcal pharyngitis to prevent rheumatic heart disease. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness was calculated from the societal perspective and expressed in cases of rheumatic heart disease prevented annually in the U.S. pediatric population aged 5 to 17 based on U.S. Census data. We used a decision-analysis model to assess the cost-effectiveness of five treatment options for patients with pharyngitis: (1) "treat all," (2) "treat none," (3) "rapid test," where only patients with a positive rapid antigen test are treated, (4) "culture," where only patients with a positive throat culture are treated, and (5) "rapid test with culture" or (RTCX), where confirmatory cultures are used on patients with negative rapid tests. Cost data were gathered from existing empirical data or estimated. We performed sensitivity analyses of the antigen test sensitivity and antibiotic effectiveness and examined whether changes in these variables would alter our outcome. RESULTS: The "rapid test" was the most cost-effective option. Using "rapid tests" prevented 85 cases of rheumatic heart disease annually and cost society $727,000 per case prevented. Performing throat cultures instead of "rapid tests" would pick up an additional 11 cases of rheumatic heart disease but would cost $13.7 million for each of these additional cases prevented. The current standard of using throat cultures as a confirmatory test on patients with a negative "rapid" test would detect an additional 21 cases of rheumatic heart disease but cost society an additional $8 million per case prevented. CONCLUSIONS: To reduce the incidence of rheumatic heart disease cost-effectively, the management of pediatric pharyngitis may best be accomplished by using antigen testing. The added costs associated with the remaining treatment options may not be justified, especially, as the sensitivity of the antigen tests continues to improve and closely approaches the sensitivity of the practice standard, throat culture.


Assuntos
Faringite/economia , Cardiopatia Reumática/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estreptocócicas/economia , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Humanos , Testes de Fixação do Látex , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Faringite/complicações , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Cardiopatia Reumática/economia , Cardiopatia Reumática/etiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/complicações , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...