Laser speckle imaging to evaluate scalp flap blood flow during closure in neurosurgical procedures.

Background: To measure the degree of relative ischemia caused by skin closure, we explored the potential utility of intraoperative surface blood flow measurement with laser speckle imaging (LSI). Methods: Prospective observational study of eight subjects that underwent intraoperative LSI during elective cranial neurosurgical procedures at the time of skin closure. Results: Seven 1st time incisions, with closure techniques including sutures (n = 3), staples (n = 3), and one after galeal sutures. When compared to the control region, there was a mean 63.7% reduction in flow across all seven subjects (range 18.7-95.32%). Comparing by closure type, a higher flow reduction in the three subjects with suture closure (80.7% reduction) compared to staples (61.9% reduction, P = 0.0379). One subject had a complex wound where tightening and loosening of sutures were performed to ensure adequate perfusion. Suturing resulted in significantly more local decreased flow compared to staples (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the relative feasibility of using LSI for preoperative vascular flow assessment in planning complex incision closure. These data also provide preliminary support for the hypothesis that skin closure itself causes relative ischemia compared to deep approximation or cautery of the skin edge and that the relative ischemia from staples closure is generally less than from suture closure.

Use of distal protection filter device for rescue mechanical thrombectomy for symptomatic free-floating thrombus of the cervical internal carotid artery.

BACKGROUND: Intraluminal free floating thrombus (FFT) of the cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) is a potentially high-risk lesion for recurrent ischemic strokes, with no single optimal treatment established. OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel interventional technique for mechanical thrombectomy of intraluminal free floating thrombus using a distal protection filter device and aspiration. METHODS: We identified two cases where anticoagulation was contraindicated in patients with intraluminal FFT and minimal underlying stenosis. In both cases, a distal protection device was used to extract the thrombus under proximal flow arrest and aspiration. RESULTS: Mechanical thrombectomy was successful in both cases, one with "en bloc" removal of the thrombus and one with piecemeal removal. Neither case showed any residual angiographic stenosis or atherosclerotic disease. CONCLUSION: Mechanical thrombectomy using a distal protection device is a novel and technically feasible approach for select cases of cervical intraluminal thrombus. This may represent a therapeutic option in select cases with high risk of anticoagulation and in the unusual subset of younger patients with minimal atherosclerotidc disease.