Further Studies on Structure-Cardiac Activity Relationships of Diterpenoid Alkaloids.

The cardiac effect of thirty-eight diterpenoid alkaloids was evaluated on the isolated bullfrog heart model. Among them, twelve compounds exhibited appreciable cardiac activity, with compounds 3 and 35 being more active than the reference drug lanatoside. The structure-cardiac activity relationships of the diterpenoid alkaloids were summarized based on our present and previous studies [2]: i) 1α-OMe or 1α-OH, 8-OH, 14-OH, and NH (or NMe) are key structural features important for the cardiac effect of the aconitine-type C19-diterpenoid alkaloids without any esters. C18-diterpenoid alkaloids, lycoctonine-type C19-diterpenoid alkaloids, and the veatchine- and denudatine-type C20-diterpenoid alkaloids did not show any cardiac activity; ii) the presence of 3α-OH is beneficial to the cardiac activity; iii) the effect on the cardiac action of 6α-OMe, 13-OH, 15α-OH, and 16-demethoxy or a double bond between C-15 and C-16 depends on the substituent pattern on the nitrogen atom.

Ring A conformation of aconine and pseudaconine in CDCl3.

On the basis of intensive interpretation of the 1H NMR spectroscopic data, the ring A conformation of aconine (1) was speculated as twist boat in CDCl3, and as chair or twist boat in acetone-d6 and pyridine-d5. The ring A of pseudaconine (2) adopts the chair conformation in CDCl3, acetone-d6, and pyridine-ds. Accordingly, the boat conformation of ring A in these two diterpenoid alkaloids in CDCl3 reported in the literature [1] should be revised. The difference in 13C NMR data for the same compound (1 or 2) in two different solvents (CDCl3, pyridine-d5) can be attributed to solvent effects.

Foreign body removed by the 'Fire and Ice Technique': A case report.

With the introduction of flexible bronchoscopies, several techniques and accessories have been available for the removal of foreign bodies (FB). However, in some cases, using conventional techniques are inappropriate and fail to remove the FB. Here we report a case of a 33-year-old male with 19 years foreign body aspiration history. A successfully removal of the ingrown FB was achieved by means of an argon plasma coagulation and a flexible cryoprobe.

Bond strength of silicone to polyurethane following immersion of silicone in cleaning solutions.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The use of polyurethane liners beneath silicone facial prostheses is recommended to improve the effectiveness of water-based adhesives, reduce bacterial colonization, and allow very thin margins. Patients using silicone prostheses with a polyurethane lining often observe different degrees of debonding which may lead to failure of the prosthesis. Aggressive cleaning may be associated with debonding of the silicone to polyurethane. PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect on bond strength of soaking specimens of silicone to polyurethane in hot or room-temperature soapy water. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Specimens of silicone to primed polyurethane were divided into 3 groups of 16 specimens for testing: control (no soak), room-temperature soapy water soak, and hot soapy water soak. The soaked specimens were placed in soapy water at different temperatures for 1825 minutes to simulate 1 year of a 5 min/day cleaning cycle. One examiner performed the assessment of T-peel strength (N/mm) for all specimens. Each specimen was attached to an adhesive testing machine and separated in tension at the crosshead speed of 25.4 mm/min. Data were analyzed with a 1-way ANOVA followed by post hoc pairwise testing using the Tukey test (alpha=.05). RESULTS: A significant difference in bonding strength between the 3 groups was found (P<.001), with post hoc tests indicating that the control group bonding strength (6.06 +/- 1.84 N/mm) was significantly higher than both room-temperature water soapy soak (3.93 +/- 1.84 N/mm; P=.005) and the hot soapy water soak group values (2.49 +/- 1.75 N/mm; P<.001). However, there was no significant difference found between the hot and room-temperature soapy soak values. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, soaking in hot or room-temperature soapy water produced a significant reduction of bond strength of silicone to polyurethane.