Pericardial irradiation dose may be strongly associated with grade 4 lymphopenia and affect prognosis in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The immune system may influence prognosis, and lymphopenia is a frequent side effect of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Radical irradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer (LA-EC) exposes significant vascular and heart volumes. In this study, we hypothesized that lymphopenia is linked to cardiac and pericardial doses and affects patient prognosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 190 LA-EC patients who received radical CCRT. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed to correlate clinical factors and dosimetric parameters with overall survival (OS). We collected lymphocyte-related variables and ratios before and during CCRT. MVA was performed to correlate hematologic toxicity with OS. The relationship between dosimetric parameters and G4 lymphopenia was determined using logistic stepwise regression. Finally, a nomogram of G4 lymphopenia was developed and validated externally. RESULTS: Median follow-up time for all patients was 27.5 months. On MVA for OS, higher pericardial V30 (PV30 ) was linked to worse survival (HR: 1.013, 95% CI: 1.001-1.026, p = 0.039). The median OS stratified by PV30 > 55.3% and PV30 ≤ 55.3% was 24.0 months and 54.0 months, respectively (p = 0.004). G4 lymphopenia was shown to be linked with worse OS in the MVA of hematological toxicity with OS (HR: 2.042, 95% CI: 1.335-3.126, p = 0.001). Thirty of the 100 patients in the training set had G4 lymphopenia. Logistic stepwise regression was used to identify variables associated with G4 lymphopenia, and the final model consisted of stage-IVA (p = 0.017), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio during CCRT (p = 0.008), Heart V50 (p = 0.046), and PV30 (p = 0.048). Finally, a nomogram predicting G4 lymphocytopenia were constructed and externally validated. The ROC curve showed an AUC for internal validation of 0.775 and external validation of 0.843. CONCLUSION: Higher doses of pericardial radiation might affect LA-EC patients' prognosis by inducing G4 lymphopenia during CCRT. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings, especially in the era of immune-checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

The safety of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy for the treatment of solid tumors: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Objective: Combination treatment regimens consisting of both immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and chemotherapeutic agents have emerged as the standard of care for a range of cancers. This network meta-analysis (NMA) examined the toxicity profiles and safety rankings of these different ICI-based combination regimens. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published as of March 1, 2022 comparing two or more treatment regimens in which at least one arm was comprised of an ICI + platinum-based chemotherapeutic regimen. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade and AEs of grade 3 or higher were the primary endpoints for this analysis, while specific AE types were secondary endpoints. This NMA combined both direct and indirect comparisons when analyzing odds ratios (ORs) and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for different ICI-based treatment regimens. Results: In total, 33 RCTs enrolling 19,012 cancer patients were included in this NMA. Of the analyzed regimens, avelumab + chemotherapy and camrelizumab + chemotherapy were associated with a significantly greater risk of AEs of any grade relative to ipilimumab + chemotherapy, durvalumab + chemotherapy, or pembrolizumab + chemotherapy. No significant differences in the risk of AEs of grade 3 or higher were observed when comparing different ICI regimens. Hepatotoxicity and pyrexia were the most common AEs associated with atezolizumab + chemotherapy treatment. Ipilimumab + chemotherapy was associated with a relatively higher risk of gastrointestinal and skin toxicity. Skin toxicity and hypothyroidism were the major AEs associated with nivolumab + chemotherapy. Fatigue and pneumonia were the most common AEs respectively associated with sugemalimab + chemotherapy and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy regimens. Conclusions: Of the evaluated regimens, camrelizumab + chemotherapy and avelumab + chemotherapy were associated with significantly higher rates of AEs of any grade, whereas durvalumab and sintilimab were relatively safe PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors, respectively, when administered in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. However, none of the evaluated ICI + chemotherapy regimens exhibited any differences with respect to the incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs, offering guidance that may be of value in routine clinical practice.

Survival of Patients With Inoperable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Baseline Severe Pulmonary Dysfunction: Impacts of Thoracic Radiotherapy and Predictive Analysis for Acute Radiation Pneumonitis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Currently, there is no standard treatment for patients with lung cancer with deteriorated pulmonary function. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of thoracic radiotherapy for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with baseline severe pulmonary dysfunction and severe acute radiation pneumonitis (SARP). METHODS: Patients were categorized into a radiotherapy group and a nonradiotherapy group, followed by analysis of clinical variables. A Cox regression was used to evaluate the impact of various factors on overall survival (OS). Each SARP factor's predictive value was assessed using logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curve, and Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: The median OS in the radiotherapy group was 21.6 months vs 8.9 months in the nonradiotherapy group. Cox analysis revealed that chemotherapy (HR, 0.221; 95% CI, 0.149-0.329; P < .001) and radiotherapy (HR, 0.589; 95% CI, 0.399-0.869; P = .008) are independent prognostic factors for the current cohort. The data suggested that the ipsilateral lung V10 (ilV10, the percentage of the lung volume that received more than 10 Gy) was an independent predictor of SARP. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that thoracic radiotherapy might be associated with clinical benefits to inoperable NSCLC in patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction and that ilV10 may be involved in the prediction of risk for SARP in these patients.

Impact of antibiotic use before definitive concurrent chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated whether antibiotic treatment before chemoradiotherapy influenced outcomes in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). METHODS: The records of LA-NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy between 2010 and 2017 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively examined together with their antibiotic use (antibiotic type, duration of treatment, and time between discontinuation and chemoradiotherapy). The influence of antibiotics on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 522 patients, 176 had received intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics in the month before chemoradiotherapy. Antibiotic use was linked to both reduced PFS (7.9 vs. 13.4 months, p < 0.001) and OS (20.4 vs. 25.3 months, p = 0.049). Multivariate regression demonstrated that antibiotic treatment was an unfavorable independent prognostic factor for LA-NSCLC patients who received chemoradiotherapy (HR 1.234; 95% CI 1.019-1.494; p = 0.031). Prognosis was also influenced by antibiotic type, length of treatment, and interval between discontinuation and chemoradiotherapy initiation. ß­lactamase inhibitors were found to be the most harmful (median OS for ß­lactamase inhibitors/fluoroquinolones/cephalosporins: 16.5/19.9/25.9 months, p = 0.045). Cutoff values for interval and duration calculated by the X­tile procedure showed that intervals of 7-16 days or durations ≤ 6 days did not significantly affect OS relative to untreated patients (intervals: p = 0.9; duration: p = 0.93). CONCLUSION: Antibiotic treatment for longer than 6 days, especially with ß­lactamase inhibitors, was associated with poor prognosis. Furthermore, delaying chemoradiotherapy for 7-16 days after antibiotic discontinuation may reduce these negative effects.

Uncertain resection of highest mediastinal lymph node positive among pN2 non-small cell lung cancer patients: survival analysis of postoperative radiotherapy and driver gene mutations.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in uncertain resection of pN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with highest mediastinal lymph node positive has not been determined. We aim to evaluate the effect of PORT and driver gene mutation status (DGMS) on survival in such patients. METHODS: 140 selected patients were grouped according to whether they received PORT and their DGMS. Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) of each group were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analyses. COX regression was used to evaluate the effects of various factors on DFS and OS. RESULTS: Of 140 patients, thirty-four patients (24.3%) received PORT, and forty (28.6%) had positive driver gene mutation status (DGp). PORT significantly prolonged LRFS (p = 0.002), DFS (p = 0.019) and OS (p = 0.02), but not DMFS (p = 0.062). By subgroup analysis, in patients with negative driver gene mutation status (DGn), those receiving PORT had notably longer LRFS (p = 0.022) and DFS (p = 0.033), but not DMFS (p = 0.060) or OS (p = 0.215), compared to those not receiving PORT. Cox analysis showed that the number of positive lymph nodes (PLNs) and administration of PORT were independent prognostic factors of DFS, and pathology, PLNs, and DGMS may be prognostic factors of OS (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Postoperative radiotherapy may improve locoregional recurrence-free and disease-free survival in patients with pN2 NSCLC with positive highest mediastinal lymph nodes, while driver gene mutation status impacted OS significantly. Only patients with positive driver gene mutations experienced significant overall survival benefits from postoperative radiotherapy.

Secondary Infections After Diagnosis of Severe Radiation Pneumonitis (SRP) Among Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Pathogen Distributions, Choice of Empirical Antibiotics, and the Value of Empirical Antifungal Treatment.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess pathogen distributions and antimicrobial sensitivity characteristics in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with severe radiation pneumonitis (SRP) and secondary infections. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from 1746 patients with NSCLC and SRP after thoracic radiation therapy from January 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Pneumonia incidence, causative pathogens, and antibiotic resistance characteristics in patients with secondary lung infections were analyzed. Risk factors associated with mortality were identified through univariate and multivariate analyses. Antifungal drug efficacy and duration-related effects were assessed with Forest plots and receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Overall, 44.5% of patients with NSCLC and SRP (777 of 1746 patients) were diagnosed with secondary lung infections. In total, 899 bacterial strains were isolated from these patients, with Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 206; 27%), Klebsiella pneumonia (n = 200; 26.2%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 104; 13.6%) being the most common. Carbapenem and cefoperazone-sulbactam resistance rates of 52.7% and 32.2%, 28.8% and 26.4%, and 23.7% and 20.2% were observed for these isolates, respectively. Infection-related deaths occurred in 22.4% of patients with SRP. Independent risk factors for infection-related death included poor performance status scores, inappropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment, bacteria/fungal coinfection, and lack of empirical antifungal treatment. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the cutoff value of empirical antifungal treatment duration was 9 (area under the curve: 0.819). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with SRP and secondary lung infections, appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment could decrease infection-related mortality, and cefoperazone-sulbactam may be an appropriate antibacterial drug. Empirical antifungal treatment for a minimum of 9 days might contribute to better outcomes. Although this represents a promising treatment approach for patients with SRP and secondary lung infections before antibacterial susceptibility testing, further prospective validation is essential.