A comparison of childbirth self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and labor pain intensity between primiparas and multiparas during the latent phase of labor: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Childbirth is a long-lasting physiological stress. As one of the main stressors, labor pain exists throughout the whole process. Childbirth self-efficacy is the confidence, or belief that they can manage pain during childbirth. This sense of self-efficacy determines how pregnant women deal with labor pain and enables them to regulate their behavior and actively deal with childbirth. However, the difference in pain sensitivity between single births (primiparas) and multiple births (multiparas) has rarely been investigated. OBJECTIVES: This study is aimed at investigating self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, labor pain of primiparas and multiparas and exploring factors related to the perceived labor pain intensity of pregnant women. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. SETTING(S): Labour and delivery in a large academic specialized hospital in Guangzhou, China. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 347 women, (182 primiparas and 165 multiparas) were enrolled in the data analysis. Pain was assessed before cervical dilatation (cervical dilatation ≤ 3 cm for the first delivery and ≤ 2 cm for the second delivery). METHOD: The general information of participants was obtained by questionnaire and obstetrical records of the subjects were obtained from the electronic medical records extracted from the electronic medical record system (EMRS). Childbirth self-efficacy, fear of childbirth (FOC) and labor pain were compared between primiparas and multiparas. Paired t-test, chi-square test, Mann-Whitney test, univariate and multivariate regression analysis were used to analyze labor pain between the two groups and investigate factors related perceived labor pain intensity. RESULTS: The total scores related to fear of childbirth, fetal health, self-control, and labor pain injury of multiparas were notably reduced compared with primiparas (all P < 0.05). The perceived labor pain intensity and duration of the first stage of labor was reduced in the multipara group compared with the primipara group. The childbirth control sense of the multipara was better than that of the primipara. The perceived labor pain intensity was negatively correlated with advanced age (age ≥ 35 years), self-efficacy score, family support, and education (all P < 0.05). In contrast, the perceived labor pain intensity was positively correlated with tension, severe fear of childbirth, and anxiety (P < 0.05). Self-efficacy, gravidity, delivery cognition, and fear of childbirth were independent risk factors for the perceived labor pain intensity in the latent period (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Fear of childbirth is a predictor of perceived labor pain intensity. The extent of labor pain (minimum and maximum) can be predicted by the level of fear the expectant mother has. During the latent phase of labor, self-efficacy, fear of childbirth and labor pain are different between primiparas and multiparas.

Assisted reproductive technology and physical activity among Chinese pregnant women at high risk for gestational diabetes mellitus in early pregnancy: A cross-sectional study.

Currently, the number of pregnant women at high risk for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and using assisted reproductive technology (ART) is increasing. The present study aims to explore the relationship between ART and physical activity in Chinese pregnant women at high risk for GDM in early pregnancy. A cross-sectional study was conducted in a regional teaching hospital in Guangzhou, China, between July 2022 and March 2023. Three hundred fifty-five pregnant women at high risk for GDM in early pregnancy completed the Chinese version of the Pregnant Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ), the Pregnancy Physical Activity Knowledge Scale, the Pregnancy Physical Activity Self-Efficacy Scale, the Pregnancy Physical Activity Social Support Scale, and a sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics data sheet. Compared to women who conceived naturally, women who used ART were more likely to be 35 years or older, unemployed, primigravidae, and to have intentionally planned their pregnancies. Women who used ART had significantly lower levels of physical activity and self-efficacy compared to their counterparts who conceived naturally. Over half (55.6%) of women who used ART reported being physically inactive, and those with lower self-efficacy, as well as the unemployed, were significantly more likely to be inactive. Physical inactivity is a critical clinical issue among women who use ART, especially in the context of GDM risk. Future research should develop and test physical activity programs, including enhancing physical activity self-efficacy for women who use ART. Patient or public contribution: In this study, survey questionnaires were completed by participants among Chinese pregnant women at high risk for GDM in early pregnancy.

Perceptions and experiences of exercise among pregnant women.

INTRODUCTION: Though exercise during pregnancy can yield important maternal benefits, most pregnant women in China do less aerobic exercise than is currently recommended. This qualitative study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of physical exercise among pregnant women and to identify perceived barriers to and facilitators of exercise participation. METHODS: Purposive sampling was used to recruit 40 pregnant women attending prenatal visits at an obstetrics outpatient department of a tertiary general hospital in Southern China. Individual semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with the verbatim transcripts analyzed through content analysis. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged from the data: perceptions and patterns of exercise; concerns and hesitations about participating in exercise; and determinants of adoption and maintenance of exercise participation. Though pregnant women recognised their need for physical exercise instruction, their demands remained unmet due to a combination of factors such as lack of knowledge, confidence, and support, and concerns about safety. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study suggest that the provision of tailored exercise programs for pregnant women, which include education, reassurance, motivational strategies, and lay and professional support, may help improve knowledge, allay concerns, boost confidence, and bolster support when doing physical exercise.

Effects of a structured Tai Chi program on improving physical activity levels, exercise self-efficacy and health outcomes among pregnant women: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Tai Chi is a traditional Chinese martial art developed over 300 years ago. Although studies report that Tai Chi benefits practitioners' cardiovascular health, respiratory system and psychological outcomes, only limited studies have evaluated the effects of Tai Chi on pregnant women. More evidence is needed to examine the effects of a Tai Chi exercise programme among pregnant women. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a randomised controlled trial to investigate the effects of a 12-week theory-based Tai Chi programme on improving physical activity levels, exercise self-efficacy and health outcomes among pregnant women. A total of 136 low-risk pregnant women (68 per group) were recruited and randomly assigned to receive usual care or usual care with the Tai Chi programme consisting of two group-based educational sessions and three Tai Chi sessions over 3 months. A Tai Chi video was provided to the participants to facilitate self-practice at home. Outcomes including physical activity levels, exercise self-efficacy, weight gain, prenatal depressive symptoms and prenatal anxiety symptoms were evaluated at baseline (T0), 6th week after intervention commencement (T1) and 1 week after intervention completion (ie, post-intervention) (T2). Intention-to-treat analysis and generalised estimating equations model will be used to analyse repeated outcome measures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong-New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ref. 2022.043-T). Written consent was obtained from each participant. The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2200059920.

A comparison of maternal fear of childbirth, labor pain intensity and intrapartum analgesic consumption between primiparas and multiparas: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare fear of childbirth and in-labor pain intensity between primiparas and multiparas and explore the association between the amount of actual pain relief and fear of childbirth. METHODS: A convenience sampling method was used. A total of 260 women undergoing spontaneous or induced labor, including 97 primiparas and 163 multiparas, were recruited in a large academic specialized hospital in Guangzhou, China, from February 2018 to August 2019. The clinical data of maternal and neonatal were extracted from a structured electronic medical record system. Other demographic information, such as employment and family monthly income, was collected by a questionnaire. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Chinese version of the Childbirth Attitude Questionnaire (C-CAQ) were applied to assess maternal in-labor pain intensity and fear of childbirth. The analgesic consumption and the frequency of manual boluses as rescue analgesia were stored and collected from the analgesia pump. RESULTS: Eighty-two (84.5%) primiparas and ninety-nine (60.7%) multiparas received epidural analgesia (P < 0.001). In the epidural subgroup, the primiparous average fear of childbirth (36.46 ± 10.93) was higher than that of the multiparas (32.06 ± 10.23) (P = 0.007). However, multiparas reported more intense in-labor pain [8.0 (8.0, 9.0) vs. 8.0 (7.0, 8.0)], had more successful manual boluses per hour [2.68 (1.65, 3.85) vs. 1.77 (0.90, 2.47)], more hourly analgesic consumption [23.00 (16.00, 28.25) vs. 17.24 (11.52, 21.36) mL] and more average analgesic consumption [0.35 (0.24, 0.45) vs. 0.26 (0.19, 0.35) mL/(h·kg)] than the primiparas (P < 0.05). Spearman's correlation analysis showed that the maximum in-labor pain was weakly positively correlated with fear of childbirth (r = 0.09) (P < 0.05), hourly analgesic consumption (r = 0.16) (P < 0.01) and average analgesic consumption (r = 0.17) (P < 0.05). No statistically significant association was uncovered between analgesic consumption and maternal fear of childbirth. CONCLUSIONS: Fear of childbirth is a potential predictor of labor pain intensity. Further study is needed to explore its role and value in pain management during delivery. Parity is not a determinant of pain relief use and should not be a preconceived preference of obstetric care team members to determine the distribution of epidural analgesia, especially when analgesia resources are insufficient.

Effect of an evidence-based activity management program on delivery outcomes in pregnant women after intraspinal labor analgesia.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of an evidence-based activity management program for pregnant women after intraspinal labor analgesia based on their delivery outcomes. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 96 pregnant women who received intraspinal labor analgesia in our hospital. The control group (48 cases) received routine nursing care after analgesia, and the intervention group (48 cases) received evidence-based activity management program after analgesia. The labor time, sense of birth control, physiological and psychological stress reactions, analgesic effect, delivery outcome and early postpartum pelvic floor function were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the first, second and third stages of labor time and the total labor time of the intervention group were significantly shorter, while the Labor Agentry Scale (LAS) score was significantly higher (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) score of the intervention group were significantly lower (P<0.05). The total analgesic rate of the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the control group (95.83% vs. 79.17%, P<0.05). The overall incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, perineal laceration, lateral episiotomy, fetal distress and neonatal asphyxia in the intervention group was significantly lower than that of the control group (16.67% vs. 35.42%, P<0.05). The incidence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and pelvic floor dysfunction in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: An evidence-based activity management program for pregnant women after intraspinal labor analgesia can effectively shorten the labor time, strengthen the analgesic effect, reduce the physiological and psychological stress reactions, increase the sense of control during birth and improve the delivery outcome as well as early pelvic floor function.

A multi-dimensional EBP educational program to improve evidence-based practice and critical thinking of hospital-based nurses: Development, implementation, and preliminary outcomes.

Improving outcomes and quality of care through evidence-based practice (EBP) is a priority globally. But most nurses have insufficient competence in EBP. How to conduct Educational interventions to enhance clinical nurses' EBP competencies and critical thinking disposition (CTD) requires more evidence. One hundred eleven clinical nurses from a Chinese four-campus hospital were enrolled in our EBP education program. The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model was used to develop and guide the educational and practical sessions. Multi-dimensional learning strategies -including online self-learning, on-site lectures, workshops, and social media-facilitated group discussions-were used to facilitate the implementation of the education sessions. After education, nurses embedded evidence into practice. The Chinese versions of the EBP Believe scale (EBPB), EBP Implementation scale (EBPI), and the Simplified Chinese Version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CTDI-SCV) were applied to assess the relevant competencies among clinical nurses before and after the education program. Clinical nurses' EBPB, EBPI, and CTDI-SCV scores improved. But only EBPB and EBP skills and attitudes were enhanced with a statistical difference (t = -2.980, -4.141, and -2.695, with all p < 0.01). There was a small positive association between EBPB and CTDI-SCV (r = 0.396, p < 0.01). Fifteen EBP programs were successfully accomplished.

Are there differences in pain intensity between two consecutive vaginal childbirths? A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pain assessment is crucial for in-labour pain management. Even though women's self-rated pain intensity is the standard for pain relief or analgesic administration, multiparas appear to receive worse in-labour pain management than primiparas do. The discrepancy in pain perception between primiparas and multiparas remains unclear. Healthcare providers tend to think that multiparas endure the pain and report less pain because they have experienced childbirth. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyse the intensity of in-labour pain during first and second vaginal childbirth within the same group of women and explore whether parity may be an influential factor in labour pain intensity. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Labour and delivery in a large academic specialized hospital in Guangzhou, China. PARTICIPANTS: Women were included if they had two consecutive vaginal childbirths with singleton cephalic presentations and cervical dilation ≤ 3 cm for the first childbirth and ≤ 2 cm for the second childbirth. The final study sample consisted of 417 women. METHODS: All childbirth case records between January 2015 and August 2018 were scanned using a structured electronic medical system. Maternal and neonatal demographics as well as obstetric and neonatal outcomes were extracted. The in-labour pain for each childbirth was compared between first and second births. Paired t-tests, McNemar's chi-square tests and mixed-effects modelling were applied to compare the differences in labour pain intensity between the two vaginal childbirths and explore the factors that influenced maximum labour pain scores during the second childbirth. RESULTS: Four hundred seventeen women were included, with an average birth interval of 1.7 years. The average maximum labour pain score during the latent phase was 6 (5,6) for the first childbirth and 5 (4,6) for the second childbirth (paired t =-6.13, P <0.001). Pain scores decreased in 28.1% (117/417) of women and increased in 13.7% (57/417) of women from the first to the second childbirth. More than half of the women in our study experienced the same maximum labour pain score during the first and second labour. Mixed-effects modelling revealed that parity, education and pregnancy complications were independently associated with maximum labour pain scores. CONCLUSIONS: From a clinical point of view, in-labour pain is not clinically different for women when comparing their first and second labours. Health care professionals may underestimate in-labour pain in primiparas when comparing them with nulliparas. More studies are warranted to explore options for achieving better pain management for women with more childbirths.

Long-term outcomes and quality of life of patients with Hirschsprung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care have improved the short- and mid-term postoperative outcomes of patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD). However, the long-term outcomes of these patients (older than 10 years) have not been fully investigated. The aim of this systematic review is to clarify the prevalence of long-term outcomes and the quality of life of these patients. METHODS: PubMed, AMED, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases were searched from inception to October 2018, following the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guideline. Original studies reporting the outcomes of patients older than ten years with HD were selected and reviewed. The overall prevalence of fecal incontinence, constipation, bowel function score, bladder dysfunction symptoms, and patients' quality of life were extracted from the included studies and pooled through the random-effects meta-analysis model. The heterogeneity and variation in the pooled estimations were evaluated by Cochrane's Q test and the I2 test. The sensitivity analysis was conducted by the sequential omission of individual studies. Publication bias was evaluated by Egger's linear regression test. The whole procedure was conducted with Stata (version 14). RESULTS: In total, 3406 articles were identified from the literature search, among which twelve studies, including 625 patients, were included for analysis. The pooled prevalences of fecal incontinence, constipation, and bladder dysfunction symptoms and good to excellent bowel function scores were 0.20 (95% CI 0.13-0.28), 0.14 (95% CI 0.06-0.25), 0.07 (95% CI 0.04-0.12), and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.97), respectively; the pooled mean score of gastrointestinal-related quality of life was 118 (95% CI: 112.56-123.44). CONCLUSIONS: HD patients older than ten years old have an overall high prevalence of fecal incontinence and a low quality of life. Targeted and evidence-based follow-up procedures and transitional care are essential to meet these patients' long-term care needs. Prospective and multicenter research that focuses on the attributes and predictors of the long-term prognosis of patients with HD are necessary.

Parental self-efficacy in managing the home care of children with Hirschsprung's disease or anorectal malformation: Development and validation of a new measure.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a scale specifically to measure parental self-efficacy (PSE) in managing the home care of children with Hirschsprung's disease (HD) or anorectal malformation (AM) (the PSE-HDAM scale), and to validate its psychometric properties. METHODS: The PSE-HDAM Scale was developed through focus group with parents and Delphi questionnaire responses of experts. A total of 230 parents of children with HD or AM were recruited to fill the PSE-HDAM, the Chinese version of the Tool to Measure Parenting Self-Efficacy (TOPSE), and the Holschneider Criteria. Content validity was measured using the Content Validity Index. Principal Component Analysis was conducted to identify dimensions of the scale. Cronbach's Alpha and Guttman's Split-Half Reliability Coefficient were used to evaluate the internal consistency of the scale. External validity was measured using the Pearson correlation coefficient between PSE-HDAM, and the Chinese version of the TOPSE and Holschneider Criteria. RESULTS: Principal Component Analysis identified five domains of the PSE-HDAM scale. The final version of the scale consisted of 19 items. The content validity was 0.89. The correlations between items and the total scale ranged between 0.75 and 0.87. The overall scale and subscales have good to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach ɑ ranged 0.67 to 0.91), and the Split-Half Coefficient of the whole scale is 0.85. The correlation between PSE-HDAM score and the TOPSE and the Holschneider Criteria was 0.68 and 0.32 respectively (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The PSE-HDAM is a reliable and valid scale to evaluate PSE in managing home care of children with HD or AM.