Comparison of the effects of thoracic and lumbar epidural anaesthesia on induction and maintenance doses of propofol during total i.v. anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: In this randomized, double-blind study, the effects of thoracic and lumbar epidural anaesthesia on the induction doses (IDs) and maintenance doses (MDs) of propofol during bispectral index (BIS) guided total i.v. anaesthesia were compared. METHODS: Fifty-four patients (three groups, n=18 each) undergoing urological surgery in lumbotomy position were studied in Groups T (Th7-8) and L (L3-4), epidural anaesthesia was performed with initial doses obtaining sensorial block at Th4 (sd 1) followed by 7 ml h(-1) infusion; Group C received no epidural anaesthesia intraoperatively. The ID (BIS <45) and MD (BIS: 40-50) of propofol and recovery (BIS >80) and extubation times were recorded. RESULTS: The volume to obtain a block was significantly lower in Group T than in Group L [10.7 (1.5) vs 14.7 (1.0) ml; P<0.001]. ID was significantly higher in Group C compared with that in Groups T and L [2.16 (0.15) vs 1.33 (0.19) vs 1.46 (0.14) mg kg(-1), respectively; P<0.001] with no significant difference between Groups T and L. For MD, there were significant differences between all groups [3.82 (0.9) vs 5.8 (1.32) vs 9.21 (0.55) mg kg(-1) h(-1) in Groups T, L, and C, respectively; P<0.001]. For recovery and extubation times, Group T

Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of conventional volume controlled PEEP ventilation, pressure regulated volume controlled ventilation and low frequency positive pressure ventilation with extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in pigs with acute ARDS.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether any benefit of low frequency positive pressure ventilation with extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (LFPPV-ECCO2R) existed over either volume controlled ventilation (VCV) with measured best-PEEP or pressure regulated volume controlled ventilation (PRVCV) with an inspiration/expiration (I/E) ratio of 4:1, with respect to arterial oxygenation, lung mechanics and haemodynamics, in acute respiratory failure. Fifteen adult pigs were used for the study. Respiratory failure was induced by surfactant depletion by repeated lung lavage. The different therapeutic approaches were applied randomly to each pig for 1 h. Measurements of gas exchange, airway pressures and haemodynamics were performed during ventilatory and haemodynamic steady state. Paco2 was kept constant in all modes. At almost similar total-PEEP, Pao2 values were significantly higher with LFPPV-ECCO2R compared to VCV with best-PEEP. Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and intrapulmonary pressure amplitude defined as the difference between PIP and total-PEEP were significantly lower with PRVCV and LFPPV-ECCO2R compared to VCV with best-PEEP. There was no significant difference between the modes concerning cardiocirculatory parameters. PRVCV with I/E ratio of 4:1 and LFPPV-ECCO2R proved to be better modes to achieve better gas exchange and lower PIP at lower intrapulmonary pressure amplitudes. It is concluded that PRVCV is an adequate form of treatment under these experimental conditions imitating acute respiratory failure, without necessitating other invasive measures.