RESUMO
Current standardized neuropsychological tests may fail to accurately capture real-world executive deficits. We developed a computer-based Cooking Task (CT) assessment of executive functions and trialed the measure with a normative group before use with a head-injured population. Forty-six participants completed the computerized CT and subtests from standardized neuropsychological tasks, including the Tower and Sorting Tests of executive function from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) and the Cambridge prospective memory test (CAMPROMPT), in order to examine whether standardized executive function tasks, predicted performance on measurement indices from the CT. Findings showed that verbal comprehension, rule detection and prospective memory contributed to measures of prospective planning accuracy and strategy implementation of the CT. Results also showed that functions necessary for cooking efficacy differ as an effect of task demands (difficulty levels). Performance on rule detection, strategy implementation and flexible thinking executive function measures contributed to accuracy on the CT. These findings raise questions about the functions captured by present standardized tasks particularly at varying levels of difficulty and during dual-task performance. Our preliminary findings also indicate that CT measures can effectively distinguish between executive function and Full Scale IQ abilities. Results of the present study indicate that the CT shows promise as an ecologically valid measure of executive function for future use with a head-injured population and indexes selective executive function's captured by standardized tests.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although the signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) is currently the best noninvasive test to identify patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) following myocardial infarction (MI), it is still a relatively insensitive test. Body surface mapping has improved the sensitivity of ECG in detecting various cardiac diseases. This study applied body surface mapping to the SAECG in the form of a clinically practical, 28-lead optimal array and compared its sensitivity and specificity with those of an orthogonal array. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-three patients with previous MI (82 with inducible VT) underwent SAECG using 28 surface electrodes from which were obtained a three-lead orthogonal array and a 28-lead optimal array (optimal). From the orthogonal array, two QRS durations (QRSd) were obtained using the combined vector magnitude method (CVM) and the earliest onset to latest offset of the three individually filtered leads (individual). From the optimal array, 28 QRSd were obtained, each defined as the duration from the earliest onset of any of the 28 leads to the offset of each individually filtered lead. QRSd > 120 msec in > or = 3 leads was considered abnormal. For CVM and individual, QRSd of > 120 msec were considered abnormal. While the specificity of each method was comparable (84%, 86%, and 84% for CVM, individual, and optimal, respectively), the sensitivity of optimal (70%) was significantly greater than the sensitivity of CVM (54%) (p = 0.001) or individual (59%) (p = 0.004). The magnitude of improvement in sensitivity, 16% and 15%, respectively, was equal for anterior (n = 120) and inferior (n = 103) infarctions. CONCLUSIONS: Body surface mapping using the 28-lead optimal array significantly improved the sensitivity of the SAECG without loss of specificity. The increased sensitivity was of equal magnitude for inferior and anterior infarctions. The superiority and practicality of the 28-lead optimal array make it worth pursuing as an option for further refinement in SAECG:
