Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: 5 years' experience in a community hospital.

OBJECTIVE: This study reports the results of a percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy program in a community hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the prospectively collected results of our imaging-guided core biopsy program during its first 5 years (1994-1998). A total of 1333 lesions (94% of which were Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment category 4) were sampled in 1183 patients. Patients with BI-RADS assessment category 5 lesions were referred to surgeons. Stereotactic guidance was used for the core biopsy of 506 lesions, and sonography was used to guide the predominantly 16-gauge needle core biopsy of 827 solid masses. RESULTS: One hundred forty-seven cancers were diagnosed in 1333 biopsies, resulting in a positive yield of 11%. Of 1020 patients with benign, concordant core biopsy results, 981 (96%) had at least one follow-up imaging examination within 36 months of the biopsy. Nineteen (2%) of these 1020 patients had a suspicious change at follow-up; 18 of these patients underwent surgical excision with benign findings. No cancers were found at imaging follow-up or by tumor registry linkage. All malignant core biopsy results were confirmed as malignant at surgical excision (positive predictive value 100%). Twenty-two patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia at core biopsy had subsequent surgery, and 12 (55%) of them were found to have cancer at surgery. CONCLUSION: An imaging-guided core biopsy program, developed and implemented by a small group of radiologists in a community hospital, can achieve successful results and provide an important service to patients and a cost-effective alternative to surgical biopsy. Our program emphasized sonographic guidance and achieved high follow-up compliance.

Mammographic changes after hormone replacement therapy in patients who have undergone breast irradiation.

OBJECTIVE: We examined three patients who began hormone replacement therapy after lumpectomy and breast irradiation. In these women increased tissue density appeared on mammography only or disproportionately in the nonirradiated breast. To our knowledge, this observation has not been reported. CONCLUSION: Breast irradiation may induce tissue changes that prevent or diminish the proliferative response that can be induced in breast tissue by postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy. Because this treatment is now recommended for some women after breast conservation therapy, mammographers may recognize this finding with increasing frequency.