Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 81(17): e478-e488, 2024 Aug 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38727687

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Hospital at home (HaH) program development, spurred by hospital congestion during the COVID-19 pandemic, is moving from a novel idea to a standard of inpatient practice. Understanding pharmacy's clinical role in the HaH patient care team is exceedingly important as programs across the country continue to develop, implement, and expand. The purpose of this study is to describe how clinical pharmacy services are currently provided for home hospital patients and to explain the vital role of pharmacists within the HaH care team. DESCRIPTION: A descriptive study was designed to evaluate pharmacy services provided for home hospital patients from January 1, 2023, to February 28, 2023. Prior to the study period, a focused group of pharmacists routinely active in HaH patient care met to define a standard process for documenting pharmacy services using an electronic documentation system (i-Vent) within the EHR. During the study period, a total of 221 patients were admitted to home hospital at either site representing 3,258 inpatient medication orders with 2,997 medication administrations. Pharmacists signed 903 progress notes and documented 561 interventions across all types. The top 3 pharmacy intervention types were drug administration change (37%), medication reconciliation (29%), and antimicrobial stewardship (15%). Each of the top 3 types were further evaluated by subtype. CONCLUSION: Documented pharmacy services encompassed a variety of intervention types. The overwhelming majority of patients admitted to the program received pharmacy consultative services, demonstrating how pivotal pharmacists are to the operational success of these programs and clinical care of HaH patients. More research is needed to expose pharmacy potential and facilitate growth for pharmacists practicing in HaH programs.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Farmacêuticos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , Papel Profissional , Humanos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Serviços Hospitalares de Assistência Domiciliar/organização & administração , Masculino , Feminino , Reconciliação de Medicamentos/organização & administração , Reconciliação de Medicamentos/métodos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
WMJ ; 119(1): 33-36, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32348069

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The US government affirmed the opioid epidemic as a public health emergency in late 2017. Prior to that, as part of the Heroin, Opiate, Prevention, and Education (HOPE) Agenda, the state of Wisconsin enacted 2015 Wisconsin Act 266. This law, which went into effect April 1, 2017, requires prescribers to review data from the state's enhanced Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (ePDMP) before issuing an opioid prescription, in order to reduce inappropriate prescriptions and, ultimately, decrease opioid overuse. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of 2015 Wisconsin Act 266 on opioid prescriptions for acute pain in Mayo Clinic Health System sites in northwest Wisconsin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included all eligible patients who were discharged from emergency or urgent care departments in the Mayo Clinic Health System at northwest Wisconsin sites during the study period. The quantity of opioids prescribed (measured in morphine milligram equivalents per patient encounter) and the total number of opioid prescriptions were compared for the periods May and June 2016 (prior to implementation of Act 266) versus May and June 2017 (post-implementation of Act 266). RESULTS: A 33% reduction occurred in the median opioid quantity prescribed per patient encounter in the post-implementation period vs the pre-implementation period (P <0.001). In addition, a 13% relative reduction occurred in the percentage of patient encounters that involved an opioid prescription (P <0.001). No difference was observed in opioid prescription agents between time periods, except for an increase in morphine prescriptions (P <0.001. CONCLUSION: The HOPE Agenda, specifically 2015 Wisconsin Act 266, appears to have had a positive effect on decreased opioid prescriptions for acute pain at Mayo Clinic Health System sites in northwest Wisconsin.


Assuntos
Dor Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Monitoramento de Prescrição de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Wisconsin
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA