Household-level lifestyle interventions for the prevention of cognitive decline; A Systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Lifestyle interventions targeting households may be an effective means of promoting healthier cognitive function in later life, with extended benefit to other household members. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to assess the effect of targeting lifestyle behaviours of households on cognitive outcomes METHODS: An electronic search strategy was designed to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where households were randomised to receive a lifestyle intervention for the prevention of cognitive decline, from database inception until April 2020. Our initial search identified no eligible studies, so we revised our search strategy to include trials enroling dyads. We reported the cognitive outcomes, functional outcomes, caregiver outcomes and long-term care (LTC) admissions for eligible studies. FINDINGS: We identified no RCTs which randomised households to receive a lifestyle intervention for preventing cognitive decline. We identified five RCTs (n = 1721, with mean follow-up of 9.6 months) which randomised dyads, which evaluated diet (two trials) and physical activity (three trials). CONCLUSION: Trials evaluating dietary and exercise interventions in dyads were identified. No trial demonstrated a significant association of interventions with change in cognitive testing, functional outcomes or long-term care admissions, although trials were small with short-term follow-up. Future studies should consider targeting lifestyle behaviours of households for prevention of dementia.

Patient awareness and sun protection behaviour following excision of basal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available regarding disease awareness and sun protection behaviour in patients previously treated for non-melanoma skin cancer. METHODS: Using a telephone-administered questionnaire, we investigated these characteristics in 250 patients in the west of Ireland who had undergone excision of basal cell carcinomas between January 2011 and December 2012. RESULTS: Only 28.8% of respondents knew that the lesion they had excised was a BCC and understood that there was a significant chance of developing another similar lesion in the next 3 years. Women and patients under age 65 were significantly better informed about their diagnosis than men (p = 0.021 and 0.000 respectively). The majority of patients (71.2%) knew that the overall effect of UV radiation on the skin was harmful and did employ some form of sun protection (avoid midday sun 72%; stay in shade 74%; wear hat 73.6%; wear sunscreen 72.8%). Females were statistically more likely to exercise better sun-protection behaviour (p = 0.002). While 76.8% of patients undertook some form of outdoor activity every day, only 22.8% wore sunscreen every day. CONCLUSIONS: Greater efforts should be made to communicate disease details and sun protection implications associated with basal cell carcinoma, especially to male patients. Improved population specific skin cancer awareness may lead to earlier detection and thus decrease both the patient morbidity and economic burden associated with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma.