The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric spinal care: A multi-centric study.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected healthcare worldwide since December 2019. We aimed to identify the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on outpatient clinic and surgical volumes and peri-operative complications for pediatric spinal deformities patients. Methods: In this multi-center retrospective study, outpatient visits (in-person and virtual care) and pediatric spine surgeries volumes in four high-volume pediatric spine centers were compared between March and December 2019 and the same period in 2020. Peri-operative complications were collected and compared in the same periods. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and comparative analyses were performed. Results: During the 2020 study period, the outpatient visit (in-person and virtual care) volume decreased during local lockdown periods by 71% for new patients (p < 0.001) and 53% for returning patients (p = 0.03). Overall, for 2020, there was a 20% reduction in new patients (p = 0.001) and 21% decrease in returning patients (p < 0.001). During the pandemic, there was also 20% less overall surgical volume of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing primary posterior spinal fusion, with a 70% reduction during lockdown times (p < 0.001). Complication rate and profile were similar between periods. Conclusion: There was a significant decrease in outpatient pediatric spine outpatient visits, particularly new patients, which may increase the proportion of pediatric patients with spinal deformities that present late, meeting surgical indication. This, in combination with the reduction in surgical volume of AIS over the first year of the pandemic, could result in an extended waitlist for surgeries during years to come. Complication rate was similar for both periods, suggesting it is safe to continue elective pediatric spine surgery even in a time of a pandemic. Level of evidence: level IV.

How useful is pre-referral pediatric spine imaging?

PURPOSE: Primary care physicians rely on radiology reports to confirm a scoliosis diagnosis and inform the need for spine specialist referral. In turn, spine specialists use these reports for triage decisions and planning of care. The objectives were to determine (1) the adequacy of index images to inform treatment decisions at the initial consultation and (2) the utility of index radiology reports for appropriate triage decisions. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted including all idiopathic scoliosis patients seen for initial consultation, aged three to 18 years, between January 1 and April 30, 2021. A score out of five was generated based on the adequacy of index images to provide accurate Cobb angle measurements and determine skeletal maturity. Index images were considered inadequate if repeat imaging was necessary. Index radiology reports, associated imaging, and new imaging, if obtained at the initial consultation, were compared. RESULTS: Of the 94 patients reviewed, 79% (n = 74) required repeat imaging at the initial consultation, of which 74% (n = 55) were due to insufficient quality and/or limited field of view. Of index images available for review at the initial consult (n = 80), 41.2% scored five out of five, and 32.5% scored two or below. Comparing index radiology reports to initial visit evaluation with ≤ 60 days between imaging (n = 49), discrepancies in Cobb angle were found in 24.5% (95% CI 14.6, 38.1) of patients. The Risser stage was reported in 14% of index radiology reports. CONCLUSION: Although pre-referral pediatric spine radiographs serve a diagnostic purpose, most are inadequate for comprehensive idiopathic scoliosis evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The impact of COVID-19 on idiopathic scoliosis referrals: cause for concern.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the short-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the demographic and clinical profile of new idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients, with a particular focus on treatment and late referral. The COVID-19 pandemic has limited health-care services and public access and, as a result, the diagnosis and management of non-COVID-19 health conditions have been compromised. Delayed diagnosis of IS may limit conservative treatment options and subsequently, increase a patient's risk of requiring surgical intervention. METHODS: The volume of spine referrals received and new IS clinic visits were compared between March 15-October 15, 2019 and the same period in 2020. A chart and radiographic review detailed the patient profile at initial presentation. Descriptive statistics and comparative analyses examined the referral source, curve magnitude, skeletal maturity, and prescribed treatment. Late referrals were those with a curve magnitude ≥ 50°, or > 40° and Risser 2 or less. RESULTS: During the 2020 study period, the referral volume decreased 76% and clinic visits 55%. The 2019 cohort was similar in age (13.7 ± 2.1 years vs 13.3 ± 2.3 years, p = 0.08), Risser score distribution (p = 0.32), menarchal status (0.07), and curve magnitude (37.1° ± 3.8° vs 39.0° ± 16.0°, p = 0.22). During the pandemic, there was an increased proportion of referrals made by pediatricians (41 to 54%, p = 0.01). The proportion of brace prescriptions increased from 30 to 42% (p = 0.01). The proportion of surgical bookings and late referrals were increased but did not reach significance. CONCLUSION: Despite no significant increase in the magnitude of the curve at initial presentation or the proportion of late referrals, there was a marked decrease in referral volume, over the first 7 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. This suggests that the majority of expected new IS patients remain undiagnosed. A future increase in late referrals should be anticipated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Development of the gait outcomes assessment list for lower-limb differences (GOAL-LD) questionnaire: a child and parent reported outcome measure.

BACKGROUND: To develop a priority-based patient/parent reported outcome measure for children with lower-limb differences (LD) by adapting the Gait Outcomes Assessment List (GOAL) questionnaire. METHODS: Guided by a conceptual framework of patient priorities, the GOAL questionnaire was iteratively modified and its sensibility evaluated by field-testing it on children with LD, and their parents. Cognitive interviews were conducted with a subgroup of these children, and an e-survey administered to a multidisciplinary group of health care professionals with expertise in paediatric LD. Findings were integrated to create the final version of the GOAL-LD. RESULTS: Twenty-five children (9-18 years), 20 parents, and 31 healthcare professionals evaluated the content and sensibility of the GOAL, with an emphasis on the relevance and importance of the items to patients' health related quality of life (HRQL). This resulted in the retention of 26 of the original 50 items, elimination of 12, modification of 12, and addition of seven new items. The new 45-item GOAL-LD questionnaire was shown to be sensible, and its content deemed important. CONCLUSIONS: The GOAL-LD questionnaire has a high level of face and content validity, and sensibility. It comprehensively captures the HRQL goals and outcomes that matter to children with LD and their parents. Following further psychometric evaluation, the GOAL-LD may serve as a much needed patient and parent reported outcome measure for this population.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis detection and referral trends: impact treatment options.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the patient demographic referred for scoliosis to the Hospital for Sick Children to determine the proportion of patients suitable for brace treatment, as per the Scoliosis Research Society guidelines. There is level 1 evidence that bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) decreases the risk of curve progression and need for surgery, but optimal brace treatment requires early curve detection. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 618 consecutive patients who underwent initial assessment in our Spine Clinic between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2014. We included children 10-18 years, with scoliosis greater than 10°, excluding those diagnosed with non-idiopathic curves. Primary outcomes were Cobb angle, menarchal status, and Risser score. We analyzed the effect of specific referral variables (family history, the person who first noticed the curve, and geographic location of residence) on presenting curve magnitude. RESULTS: During the study period, 335 children met the inclusion criteria, with an average age of 14.1 ± 1.8 years and a mean Cobb angle of 36.8 ± 14.5°. Brace treatment was indicated in 17% of patients; 18% had curves beyond optimal curve range for bracing (> 40°), and 55% were skeletally mature, therefore not brace candidates. The majority of curves (54%) were first detected by the patient or family member and averaged 7° more than curves first detected by a physician. A family history of scoliosis made no difference to curve magnitude, nor did geographic location of residence. CONCLUSION: The majority of AIS patients present too late for effective management with bracing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Spinal Casting for the Treatment of Severe Early Onset Scoliosis: Utilization of a Nonsurgical Health Care Provider for Cast Application.

BACKGROUND: Spinal casting with the aim of delaying surgical intervention is a widely accepted but resource intensive conservative management strategy used by spine surgeons to treat severe early onset scoliosis. Opting to use a nonsurgical health care provider for cast application may be an effective use of human resources if the quality of care is not compromised. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of spinal cast treatment utilizing a nonsurgical health care provider for cast application. METHODS: This is a chart and radiographic review of all 30 patients that initiated spinal cast treatment between 2007 and 2018 and have at least 2-year follow-up. A spine surgeon applied all casts before July 14; a physical therapist (PT) applied all subsequent casts. Comparative analyses were performed for baseline data and the amount of correction achieved in initial cast. Complications and delay time to surgery were recorded. RESULTS: The PT cast 16 patients (12 female, 10 idiopathic, 64 casts total), average age 3.8±1.4 years and mean major curve of 63±18 degrees. Similarly the spine surgeon cast 14 patients (11 female, 8 idiopathic, 53 casts total), average age 4.4±1.7 years (P=0.30) and mean major curve of 63±11 degrees (P=0.93). In the initial cast the PT obtained 55%±13% (28±12 degrees) correction and the surgeon 44%±12% (36±12 degrees, P=0.09). The average number of casts was similar (4.0 vs. 3.8, P=0.7). The PT had 1 patient develop superior mesenteric artery syndrome, which resolved with cast removal, and the surgeon had 2 patients require extra care related to skin breakdown. With average follow-up of 4.15 years (range, 2.0 to 5.8 y) 11/14 PT patients demonstrate curve improvement compared with their initial presentation and 2 patients have undergone surgical intervention (3.2 and 4.3 y after first cast). The surgeon's average delay time to surgery was 4.3 years (range, 1.8 to 8.7 y after first cast, n=10). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support our current model of care utilizing a nonsurgical health care practitioner for spinal cast application. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative.

Staged insertion of growing rods in severe scoliosis.

PURPOSE: The objective of this retrospective chart and radiographic review was to present the clinical outcomes and complication rate of a staged approach to modern dual growing-rod (GR) surgery when treating children with severe early onset scoliosis. METHODS: Fifteen patients received a 6-mm dual GR system. During Stage 1, pairs of end vertebra were exposed in a subperiosteal fashion, instrumented, grafted, and fused. Stage 2 was performed, on average, 5 months later (range 8-35 weeks) and the fused foundations were connected with two growing rods under skull-femoral traction. Clinical and operative notes were reviewed and all complications were recorded. Radiographic measurements were assessed at pre-index, with intraoperative traction during Stage 1, post-Stage 2 and at most recent follow-up. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate change in scoliosis and kyphosis. RESULTS: At initial surgery, the average age was 8.17 ± 1.5 years. The mean Cobb angle was 88.1° ± 14.0°, corrected to 60.3° ± 8.7° (p < 0.001) with intraoperative traction in Stage 1, preserved after Stage 2 instrumentation (59.5° ± 9.6°, p = 0.69), and maintained with subsequent lengthenings (60.6° ± 12.8°, p = 0.73). Hyperkyphosis (11/15 patients) improved from 70.8° ± 15.7° to 46.6° ± 9.7° (p < 0.001). At minimum 2-year follow-up (range 24-80 months, mean 49.5), the complication rate was 14 (0.93 complications/patient), including 6 rod breakages, 6 superficial infections, and 2 deep infections. No anchor migration or pull-out was noted. Seven patients have undergone definitive posterior spinal fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Staged insertion of dual GR systems permits strong distraction, with acceptable correction of severe deformities and minimal complications. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.