Safety and tolerability of tedizolid as oral treatment for bone and joint infections.

Bone and joint infections (BJIs) are common infections increasingly managed with oral therapy. However, there are limited safe oral options for many Gram-positive pathogens. In animal studies and short-term human use, tedizolid lacks the hematologic and neurologic toxicity of the other available oxazolidinone, linezolid. However, there are limited prospective safety data. We conducted an open-label, non-comparative trial of oral tedizolid for BJI treatment. Primary outcomes were safety and cure rate. Eligible patients had a BJI caused by documented or suspected Gram-positive pathogen, required 4-12 weeks of therapy, and did not have myelosuppression or peripheral/optic neuropathy. Subjects underwent weekly evaluation for cytopenias and neuropathy. We enrolled 44 subjects; five were lost to follow-up. Two subjects did not complete planned treatment because of rash (n = 1) and urgent surgery (n = 1). Of 37 patients with evaluable outcomes, 17 (46%) had hardware-associated infection, 13 (35%) had osteomyelitis, 5 (14%) had prosthetic joint infection, and 2 (5%) had other BJIs. Median (mean, range) treatment duration was 12 (10.1, 4-12) weeks. There were no cases of cytopenias or peripheral or optic neuropathy. Treatment cure occurred in 13 (35%); 19 (51%) required antibiotic continuation after 12 weeks of tedizolid related to retained hardware at the BJI site, and failure occurred in four (11%), two unlikely, one possibly, and one probably due to tedizolid. We found that oral tedizolid was well tolerated for prolonged BJI treatment without significant toxicity. Clinical failure rate was similar to that of other published BJI investigations. (This study has been registered at Clinicaltrials.gov under identifier NCT03009045.) IMPORTANCE Bone and joint infections are common infections with limited effective and safe oral options for Gram-positive infections. The largest prospective clinical trial of tedizolid therapy for bone and joint infections enrolled 44 patients and tested each in person weekly with detailed safety monitoring including tests for leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, peripheral neuropathy, and optic neuropathy for up to 12 weeks. Findings demonstrated tedizolid was generally well tolerated and there were no incident cases of cytopenias or neuropathy. Cure rates were similar to that in other bone and joint infection studies. In summary, oral tedizolid appears to be a well-tolerated oral option for Gram-positive bone and joint infections.

Universal Tetanus-Diphtheria-Pertussis Vaccination During Pregnancy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination in pregnant patients in the United States. METHODS: A decision-analytic model in TreeAge was developed to compare universal Tdap vaccination in pregnancy with no Tdap vaccination in pregnancy using a theoretical cohort of 3.66 million pregnant individuals, the approximate number of deliveries per year in the United States. Outcomes included infant pertussis infections, infant hospitalizations, infant encephalopathy cases, infant deaths, and maternal pertussis infections. All probabilities and costs were derived from the literature. Utilities were applied to discounted life expectancies at a rate of 3% to generate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). A strategy was considered cost effective if it had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of less than $100,000 per QALY. Univariable and multivariable sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model to changes in the baseline assumptions. RESULTS: With a baseline assumption of vaccine cost at $47.75, Tdap vaccination was cost effective at $7,601 per QALY. The vaccination strategy was associated with a decrease of 22 infant deaths, 11 infant encephalopathy cases, 2,018 infant hospitalizations, 6,164 infant pertussis infections, and 8,585 maternal pertussis infections, with an increase of 19,489 QALYs. In sensitivity analyses, the strategy was cost effective until the incidence of maternal pertussis became lower than 1.6 cases per 10,000 individuals, the cost of the Tdap vaccine was greater than $540, or previous pertussis immunity was present in more than 92.1% of pregnant individuals. CONCLUSION: In a theoretical U.S. cohort of 3.66 million pregnant individuals, Tdap vaccination during pregnancy is cost effective and reduces infant morbidity and mortality compared with no vaccination during pregnancy. These findings are especially relevant given that approximately half of individuals are not vaccinated during pregnancy and recent data have shown that postpartum maternal vaccination and cocooning strategies are ineffective. Public health strategies to encourage greater uptake of Tdap vaccination should be used to reduce the morbidity and mortality of pertussis infection.

Elevated liver enzymes and adverse outcomes among patients with preeclampsia with severe features.

OBJECTIVE: The rate of preeclampsia with severe features has increased. Previous studies have shown elevated liver enzymes are an indicator of worsening hypertensive disease of pregnancy and adverse outcomes, therefore leading to their inclusion as a diagnostic criterion for severe features of preeclampsia. Despite this, there are limited data to support an aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentration ≥ two times the upper limit of normal as the critical point at which maternal harm from ongoing pregnancy exceeds neonatal harm from delivery. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association between elevated liver enzymes and maternal and neonatal outcomes among patients with preeclampsia with severe features. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study among hypertensive patients who delivered ≥23 weeks' gestation at Oregon Health & Science University (October 2013-September 2018). Those with preeclampsia with severe features (including chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia meeting criteria for severe features) were included after a screening of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes and chart validation. The primary exposure was elevated liver enzymes prior to delivery, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' criteria for severe features of preeclampsia: aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥2x the upper limit of normal (above threshold liver function tests [LFTs]). Primary outcomes included adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Differences were analyzed by Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, t-test, and logistic regression, with α = 0.05. RESULTS: Of 11,825 deliveries, 319 (2.7%) met inclusion criteria and had preeclampsia with severe features. Of these, 44 (13.8%) had above threshold LFTs. Adverse maternal outcomes were no different in those with above threshold LFTs compared to those with below threshold LFTs. The unadjusted odds of an adverse neonatal outcome were 2.08 times greater in patients with above threshold LFTs (95% CI: 1.04-4.14), and 2.43 times greater when adjusting for maternal characteristics (95% CI: 1.17-5.04) compared to those with below threshold LFTs. However, the association between above threshold LFTs and adverse neonatal outcomes became non-significant after adjustment for gestational age at delivery (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 0.63-3.76). CONCLUSION: Among patients with preeclampsia with severe features, above threshold LFTs are not independently associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. Adverse neonatal outcomes in patients with preeclampsia with severe features and above threshold LFTs are driven by earlier gestational age at delivery. Prospective studies are needed to guide delivery timing in patients with preeclampsia and elevated liver enzymes. BRIEF RATIONALE: The criteria for elevated liver function tests (greater than two times the upper limit of normal) are widely accepted among obstetricians to diagnose a severe feature of preeclampsia. However, these criteria are based on expert opinion and extrapolated from data on patients with HELLP syndrome. Since preterm delivery of the neonate is recommended for preeclampsia with severe features, the threshold used to define severe liver enzyme elevation has a direct impact on neonatal outcomes. Therefore, the goal of our study was to determine if patients with preeclampsia with severe features and a pre-delivery AST or ALT level ≥ two times the upper limit of normal have worse maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to those with an AST and ALT below this level.

Evaluation of Low-Dose Aspirin to Prevent Preeclampsia in Pregnant People with Chronic Hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate if the use of low-dose aspirin (LDA) among pregnant individuals with chronic hypertension (CHTN) reduces the rate of superimposed preeclampsia or other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Our study included single-center cohort of pregnant individuals with CHTN who had a live birth after 23 weeks' gestation, between 2013 and 2018. The primary exposure was the use of LDA in pregnancy and the primary outcome was superimposed preeclampsia. LDA use was also evaluated by the timing of initiation, before or after 16 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes included preeclampsia subtypes (e.g., preeclampsia with severe features, early-onset disease), as well as adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Differences were analyzed by χ 2, Fisher's exact, or t tests, with logistic regression to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Of 11,825 deliveries during the study period, 494 (4.2%) occurred in women with CHTN. Among those with CHTN, 174 (35%) were prescribed LDA, most often 81 mg daily (173 out of 174, 99%). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, but the history of preeclampsia was more common in those prescribed LDA. The rate of superimposed preeclampsia was no different among those with CHTN-prescribed LDA compared with those who were not (36% vs. 30%, p = 0.2), even when restricting the analysis to those prescribed LDA before 16 weeks' gestation (33 vs. 30%, p = 0.2). In addition, LDA did not lead to a reduction in the rate of preeclampsia with severe features, early-onset preeclampsia, or other adverse maternal outcomes. However, the composite rate of adverse neonatal outcomes was lower in LDA users versus nonusers (4.0 vs. 13%, p = 0.002), which persisted after multivariable adjustment (adjusted odds ratio: 0.28, 95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.67). CONCLUSION: Among pregnant individuals with CHTN, LDA did not decrease the rate of superimposed preeclampsia. Further studies are warranted to validate our observed reduction in adverse neonatal outcomes and to determine if aspirin is more beneficial at dosages greater than 81 mg daily. KEY POINTS: · Superimposed preeclampsia rates are the same regardless of LDA.. · Decreased rate of adverse neonatal outcomes is seen with LDA.. · No decrease in adverse maternal outcomes is seen with LDA..