Biliary Leaks: Multidisciplinary Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment.

Bile leaks arise from various causes such as trauma, complications after hepatobiliary surgery, and intrahepatic malignancies or their associated liver-directed treatments. Bile leaks can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Delayed diagnosis is not uncommon due to nonspecific manifestations; therefore, a high clinical suspicion is needed. A multidisciplinary approach for treatment of biliary leaks with prompt referral to tertiary care centers with experienced hepatobiliary surgeons, advanced endoscopists, and interventional radiologists is needed to address these challenging complications. Management of biliary leaks can range from conservative management to open surgical repair. Minimally invasive procedures play a crucial role in biliary leak treatment, and the interventional radiologist can help guide appropriate management on the basis of a clear understanding of the pathophysiology of biliary leaks and a current knowledge of the armamentarium of treatment options. In most cases, a simple diversion of bile to decompress the biliary system may prove effective. However, persistent and high-output biliary leaks require delineation of the source with tailored treatment options to control the leak. This may be done by additional diversions, occluding the source, reestablishing connections, or using a combination of therapies to bridge to more definitive surgical interventions. The authors describe the different treatment options and emphasize the role of interventional radiology. ©RSNA, 2024.

An Ex Vivo Human Kidney Perfusion Model Confirms Larger Microwave Ablation Dimensions After Transarterial Embolization.

PURPOSE: To utilize a novel ex vivo perfused human renal model and quantify microwave ablation (MWA) size differences in renal tissue when combining MWA with transarterial embolization (TAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human kidneys (n = 5) declined for transplantation were obtained and connected to a fluoroscopic-compatible ex vivo perfusion system. Two ablations-1 standard MWA, 1 TAE-MWA-were performed in each kidney for 2 minutes at 100 Watts using a MWA system (Solero Angiodynamics). MWA alone was performed in the upper pole. In the lower pole, MWA was performed after TAE with M0 LUMI microspheres (Boston Scientific) to achieve angiographic stasis. Ablation zones of coagulative necrosis were sectioned along the long axis and segmented for maximal short axis diameter (SAD) and long axis diameter (LAD) measurements. RESULTS: A total of 10 ablations (5 MWA, 5 TAE-MWA) were performed in five human kidneys. TAE-MWA resulted in significantly increased SAD, LAD, volume, and sphericity compared to standard MWA + SD with mean measurements as follows (5 standard MWA + SD vs 5 TAE-MWA, two-tailed t-test): SAD, 1.8 ± 0.1 cm vs 2.5 ± 0.1 cm (p < 0.001); LAD, 2.9 ± 0.3 cm vs 3.2 ± 0.1 cm (p = 0.039); volume, 5.0 ± 0.5 mL vs 11.0 ± 0.7 mL (p < 0.001); sphericity, 0.4 ± 0.2 vs 0.6 ± 0.1 (p = 0.049). Histology demonstrated no differences in TAE-MWA other than concentrated microspheres. CONCLUSION: This study utilized a novel ex vivo human kidney perfusion model to confirm combined MWA-TAE significantly increases ablation size and spherical shape.

Creation of an Ex Vivo Renal Perfusion Model to Investigate Microwave Ablation.

This study hypothesized that an ex vivo renal perfusion model can create smaller microwave ablation (MWA) measurements during perfused states compared with nonperfused states across multiple device settings. Nine bovine kidneys, a fluoroscopic compatible perfusion model, and a commercially-available clinical MWA system were used to perform 72 ablations (36 perfused and 36 nonperfused) at 9 different device settings. Comparing perfused and nonperfused ablations at each device setting, significant differences in volume existed for 6 of 9 settings (P < .05). Collapsed across time settings, the ablation volumes by power were the following (perfused and nonperfused, P value): 60 W, 2.3 cm3 ± 1.0 and 7.2 cm3 ± 2.7, P < .001; 100 W, 5.4 cm3 ± 2.1 and 11.5 cm3 ± 5.6, P < .01; and 140 W, 11.2 cm3 ± 3.7 and 18.7 cm3 ± 6.3, P < .01. Applied power correlated with ablation volume: perfused, 0.021 cm3/W and R = 0.462, P = .004, and nonperfused, 0.029 cm3/W and R = 0.565, P < .001. These results support that an ex vivo perfused organ system can evaluate MWA systems and demonstrate heat sink perfusion effects of decreased ablation size.