Socioeconomic burden of schizophrenia: a targeted literature review of types of costs and associated drivers across 10 countries.

AIMS: Schizophrenia has the highest median societal cost per patient of all mental disorders. This review summarizes the different costs/cost drivers (cost components) associated with schizophrenia in 10 countries, including all cost types and stakeholder perspectives, and highlights aspects of disease associated with greatest costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Targeted literature review based on a search of published research from 2006 to 2021 in the United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Canada, Japan, Brazil, and China. RESULTS: Sixty-four published articles (primary studies and literature reviews) were included. Comprehensive data were available on costs in schizophrenia overall, with very limited data for individual countries except the US. Most data is related to direct and not indirect costs, with extremely scarce data for several key cost components (adverse events, suicide, long-term care). Total schizophrenia-related per person per year (PPPY) costs were $2,004-94,229, with considerable variability among countries. Indirect costs were the main cost driver (50-90% of all costs), ranging from $1,852 to $62,431 PPPY. However, indirect costs are not collected systematically or incorporated in health technology assessments. Total schizophrenia-related PPPY direct costs were $4,394-31,798, with inpatient cost as the main cost driver (∼20-99% of direct costs). Intangible costs were not reported. Despite limited evidence, total schizophrenia-related costs were higher in patients with than without negative symptoms, largely due to increased costs of medication and medical visits. LIMITATIONS: As this was not a systematic review, prioritization of studies may have resulted in exclusion of potentially relevant data. All costs were converted to USD but not corrected for inflation or subjected to a gross domestic product deflator. CONCLUSIONS: Direct costs are most commonly reported in schizophrenia. The substantial underreporting of indirect and intangible costs undervalues the true economic burden of schizophrenia from a payer, patient, and societal perspective.

The true costs of diseases such as schizophrenia extend far beyond the obvious direct costs of hospital visits, outpatient appointments and medications to include indirect costs such as loss of productivity among patients and caregivers due to unemployment, early retirement and premature death. This review of literature published between 2006 and 2021 reveals that the indirect costs of schizophrenia actually account for between 50% and 90% of all costs, but are often not taken into account in healthcare planning. In addition, intangible costs, including the pain, suffering, stress, and anxiety experienced by patients and caregivers due to schizophrenia have not been reported in the literature. Costs were also higher for patients with negative symptoms of schizophrenia (where patients appear withdrawn and lacking in emotion, with few social relationships) compared with those with positive symptoms (including delusions or hallucinations). This is largely due to the greater costs for medications and medical visits among patients with negative symptoms. In summary, this review demonstrates that the true cost of schizophrenia, including direct, indirect, and intangible costs, is likely to be substantially higher than the values for the cost of disease currently reported.

Opportunistic infections associated with Janus kinase inhibitor treatment for rheumatoid arthritis: A structured literature review.

BACKGROUND: The availability of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors has transformed the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), helping patients achieve clinical remission. However, the emergence of opportunistic infections (OIs) associated with the use of JAK inhibitors has been reported. This structured literature review was conducted to summarize reports of OIs associated with JAK inhibitor treatment for RA in clinical trials. METHODS: Structured searches were performed in MEDLINE® and Embase® to identify relevant clinical trial data through March 2021. Bibliographic searches of recent reviews were also conducted, and gray literature searches were used to supplement key gap areas. Publications were screened, extracted, and quality assessed. Data were narratively synthesized. RESULTS: Following screening, 105 publications describing 62 unique clinical trials reporting the rates of OIs in RA patients treated with JAK inhibitors were included. Overall, the highest exposure-adjusted incidence rate was reported for herpes zoster (HZ) infection (any form), followed by OI (any) and tuberculosis based on limited data from clinical trials with approved doses of JAK inhibitors. Lack of head-to-head trials and differences in trial design preclude direct comparison across JAK inhibitors. Higher rates of OIs were noted in the Asian and Australian populations compared with the global population. Higher rates of OIs were also noted with increasing dose of JAK inhibitors in most clinical trial data. CONCLUSIONS: HZ was the most common OI reported among RA patients using all currently approved JAK inhibitors in clinical trials, although tuberculosis and other OIs were also reported. More long-term safety studies in the real-world setting are needed to compare the risk of OIs between various JAK inhibitors.

A comparative study of the glycemic control of various antidiabetic agents and the role of homocysteine in the therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate and to compare the glycemic control of various antidiabetic agents and the role of homocysteine in type 2 diabetes mellitus. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two hundred forty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, divided into Groups 1-6 (n=40), received glipizide, glipizide-SR, glimepiride, glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin followed by an oral hypoglycemic agent, respectively. They were evaluated with respect to glycemic control, serum insulin, safety, and quality of life (QoL) for 24 weeks. Furthermore, poorly controlled patients with elevated serum homocysteine were divided into two groups, of which received folic acid for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Glipizide-SR significantly improved glycemic control at lower serum insulin levels, was well tolerated, and improved QoL. Metformin improved glycemic control and reduced insulin resistance in obese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Initial insulin therapy led to rapid reduction in hyperglycemia with reduced insulin resistance. Folic acid therapy significantly (P<.001) lowered elevated serum homocysteine levels in poorly controlled patients. CONCLUSIONS: Glipizide-SR emerged as the sulfonylurea of choice in lean type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, while metformin was preferable for obese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Short-course insulin therapy with subsequent oral hypoglycemic agent could obviate the need for continuous insulin therapy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Folic acid constitutes an inexpensive and safe therapy for hyperhomocysteinemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.