Severe acute kidney injury related to haemolysis after pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has been proposed as a novel alternative to radiofrequency (RF) and cryoablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Following the occurrence of two cases of acute kidney injury (AKI) secondary to haemolysis after a PFA procedure, we evaluated haemolysis in a cohort of consecutive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two cases of AKI occurred in last May and June 2023. AKI was secondary to acute and severe haemolysis after a PFA procedure. From June 2023, a total of 68 consecutive patients (64.3 ± 10.5 years) undergoing AF ablation with PFA were enrolled in the study. All patients had a blood sample the day after the procedure for the assessment of haemolysis indicators. The pentaspline PFA catheter was used with a total number of median applications of 64 (54; 76). Nineteen patients (28%) showed significantly depleted haptoglobin levels (<0.04 g/L). A significant inverse correlation was found between the plasma level of haptoglobin and the total number of applications. Two groups were compared: the haemolysis+ group (haptoglobin < 0.04 g/L) vs. the haemolysis- group. The total number of applications was significantly higher in the haemolysis+ group vs the haemolysis - group respectively 75 (62; 127) vs 62 (54; 71) P = 0.011. More than 70 applications seem to have better sensitivity and specificity to predict haemolysis. CONCLUSION: Intravascular haemolysis can occur after certain procedures of PFA. Acute kidney injury is a phenomenon that appears to be very rare after a PFA procedure. However, caution must be exercised in the number of applications to avoid severe haemolysis.

Varus will have varus; a radiological study to assess and predict varus stem placement in uncemented femoral stems.

BACKGROUND: Varus inclination of the uncemented stem is not necessarily a technical error. The proximal femoral anatomy of hips with a coxa vara deformity frequently predisposes varus inclination. METHODS: We reviewed a series of 200 patients undergoing primary uncemented THA with the Corail® hip system. Preoperative data were based on patient demographics, diagnosis, and radiographic information (preoperative templating-CT measurements), and compared postoperative alignment for each stem and type of stem used. Proximal femoral traits which can alert surgeons, when templating preoperatively, to potential varus alignment were noted. RESULTS: All stems were inserted either in neutral or varus alignments. Low neck shaft angle is strongly predictive of increased varus stem alignment (p<0.001). Stems inserted with higher varus alignment were associated with the preoperative morphological traits associated with coxa vara hip deformities - increased femoral offset (p<0.001), greater trochanteric overhang (p<0.001), greater trochanteric height (p<0.046), and a lower canal flare index (p<0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Varus stem alignment is neither unexpected nor necessarily a technical failure when using this particular uncemented stem system. Coxa vara deformities, due to a combination of morphological traits, are more likely to be inserted with higher varus alignment than hips with normal or higher neck shaft angles. Surgeons need to be aware of this when carrying out preoperative templating and intraoperative assessment, in order to prevent over-compensation for offset, length or stability.