Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemias: how heterogenous is their management?

Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a yeast used mainly as a probiotic for prevention or treatment of diarrhoea. However, the prevalence of S. cerevisiae fungemia has risen over the past years, notably among patients with predisposing factors. This retrospective study presents 21 cases of S. cerevisiae fungemia at the University Hospital of Liege from 2000 to 2022, their clinical relevance and therapeutic management. Each patient presented one or several risk factors prior to fungemia. The isolated strains presented high minimal inhibitory concentration for fluconazole, while MICs for amphotericin B, voriconazole and echinocandins were low. Some patients received antifungal therapy, while for others only central and peripheral lines were removed and probiotics discontinued. The MICs obtained for voriconazole and echinocandins makes them an alternative treatment to fluconazole and amphotericin B as reported in other studies. Since a S. cerevisiae fungemia can induce the same complications as candidemia, follow-up blood cultures should be collected and metastatic foci should be looked for. This study showed an important discrepancy in the clinical management of infections due to S. cerevisiae and highlights the need for guidelines.

Oral minocycline as systemic therapy for uncomplicated venous access device-related bloodstream infection with coagulase-negative staphylococci after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Venous access device-related bloodstream infection (VAD-BSI) with coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) is a common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Standard systemic antimicrobial therapy for uncomplicated VAD-BSI with methicillin-resistant CoNS consists of intravenous (IV) vancomycin (vanco). This requires hospitalization, needs new competent venous access, exposes patients to potential toxicity (mainly renal) and increases the risk of commensal flora dysbiosis with selection of vanco-resistant enterococci. Combined with VAD management (removal or antibiotic locks), oral minocycline (mino) has been evaluated as an alternative systemic therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated VAD-BSIs with CoNS at our center, primarily when the reference treatment with IV vanco was not possible (renal failure or allergy) or when hospitalization was refused by patients. Here, we retrospectively report our single center experience with this mino-based approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2020, 24 uncomplicated VAD-BSIs with CoNS in 23 alloHCT patients were treated with oral mino as systemic antibiotic therapy in combination with VAD management. VAD were implantable ports (n = 17), tunneled catheter (n = 1) or PIC-lines (n = 6). Staphylococci were S. epidermidis (n = 21) or S. haemolyticus (n = 3). Mino was administered with a loading dose of 200 mg followed by 100 mg BID for 7-14 days. For 8 VAD-BSIs, patients were initially treated with IV vanco for the first 1-3 days followed by oral mino, while 16 VAD-BSIs were treated with oral mino as the sole antimicrobial agent for systemic therapy. VAD management consisted of catheter removal (for tunneled catheters and PIC-lines, n = 7) or antibiotic locks with vanco (n = 15) or gentamicin (n = 2) administered at least 3 times a week for 14 days (for ports). RESULTS: Overall, clearance of bacteremia (as assessed by negativity for the same CoNS of surveillance peripheral blood cultures drawn between day+ 3 and +30 after initiation of systemic therapy) was achieved in all but 1 patient (with port) who had persistent bacteremia at day +9. No complication such as suppurative thrombophlebitis, endocarditis, distant foci of infection or BSI-related death was observed in any patient during the 3-month period after initiation of treatment. Regarding the 17 port-BSI cases for which VAD conservative strategy was attempted, failure of 3-month VAD preservation was documented in 7/17 cases and 3-month recurrence of VAD-BSI was observed in 3/17 cases (with 1 patient with cellulitis). Treatment with mino was well tolerated except for a mild skin rash in one patient. CONCLUSION: Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate efficacy and safety of this approach.

[Does a rapid antibiotic susceptibility test optimize antibiotic therapy of patients with bacteremia ?] / Un antibiogramme rapide optimise-t-il la prise en charge thérapeutique des patients présentant une bactériémie ?

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the contribution of a rapid antibiotic susceptibility test performed directly from a positive blood culture (PBC), the dRAST™, in the management of patients with bacteremia. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the time from sampling to availability of antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) results («time-to-result¼, TTR) between dRAST™ and classic AST (Vitek®2), in 150 patients with bacteremia. The antibiotic treatment of these 150 patients was classified into three categories (optimal, suboptimal, ineffective) according to the time of availability of AST results. RESULTS: Adaptation of antibiotic treatment to optimal therapy following AST results occurred in 46/100 (46 %) of Gram-negative PBC and in 4/50 (2 %) of Gram-positive HP. TTR was significantly lower with dRAST™ compared with classic AST (29:35 (± 08:48) hours versus 50:55 (± 12:45) hours, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For patients with bacteremia requiring adjustment of empirical antibiotic therapy based on AST, dRAST™ could allow a faster administration of optimal therapy.

CONTEXTE: Nous avons évalué la contribution d'un antibiogramme rapide réalisé directement à partir d'une hémoculture positive (HP), le dRAST™, dans la prise en charge des patients présentant une bactériémie. Méthodes: Nous avons comparé, rétrospectivement, le délai entre le prélèvement et la disponibilité des résultats d'antibiogramme («temps-pour-résultats¼, TPR) entre le dRAST™ et l'antibiogramme classique (Vitek®2), auprès de 150 patients présentant une bactériémie. Les antibiothérapies de ces 150 patients ont été classés en trois catégories (optimale, suboptimale, inefficace) en fonction du moment d'obtention des résultats de l'antibiogramme. Résultats : L'adaptation du traitement antibiotique en thérapie optimale suite au résultat de l'antibiogramme est survenue chez 46/100 (46 %) des HP à Gram négatif et chez 4/50 (2 %) des HP à Gram positif. Le TPR était significativement plus faible avec le dRAST™ par rapport à l'antibiogramme classique (29:35 (± 08:48) heures versus 50:55 (± 12:45) heures, p < 0,001). CONCLUSION: Pour les patients avec bactériémie nécessitant une adaptation de l'antibiothérapie empirique basée sur l'antibiogramme, le dRAST™ permettrait une administration plus rapide du traitement optimal.

Multicenter interlaboratory study of routine systems for the susceptibility testing of temocillin using a challenge panel of multidrug-resistant strains.

Accurate susceptibility result of temocillin (TMO) is important for treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales. This multicenter study aimed to investigate the performance of routine temocillin testing assays against Enterobacterales challenging strains. Forty-seven selected clinical isolates were blindly analyzed by 12 Belgian laboratories using VITEK® 2 (n = 5) and BD Phoenix™ (n = 3) automated systems, ETEST® gradient strip (n = 3), and disk (3 brands) diffusion method (DD; n = 6) for temocillin susceptibility using standardized methodology. Results were interpreted using EUCAST 2023 criteria and compared to the broth microdilution (BMD; Sensititre™ panel) method used as gold standard. Methods' reproducibility was assessed by testing 3 reference strains in triplicate. A total of 702 organism-drug results were obtained against 33 TMO-susceptible and 14 TMO-resistant isolates. Excluding Proteae species (P. mirabilis and M. morganii), the essential agreement rates were excellent (91.5-100%) for all MIC-based methods. The highest category agreement was achieved by ETEST® (97.5%) followed by VITEK® 2 (93.2%), disk diffusion (91.6%), and BD Phoenix™ (88.5%). BD Phoenix™ and paper disk diffusion overcalled resistance (11.5% and 6.8% of major discrepancies, respectively), while ROSCO tablets diffusion and VITEK® 2 generated higher very major discrepancies (7.1% and 4.2% respectively). Inter-assay reproducibility was unsatisfactory using recommended E. coli ATCC 25922 strain but was excellent with E. coli ATCC 35218 and K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 strains. This interlaboratory study suggests that routine testing methods provide accurate and reproducible TMO categorization results except for Proteae species.

Evaluation of the Revogene® GBS DS assay performance for the intrapartum screening of group B streptococcus in comparison with intrapartum culture.

Prevention of perinatal Group B Streptococcus (GBS) transmission is crucial in our effort to prevent Early-onset GBS disease. Here, we established the performance of the Revogene GBS DS assay for the detection of group B streptococcus on intrapartum vaginal samples in a laboratory environment using a prospective noninterventional study design. Intrapartum vaginal swabs were enriched using a selective culture method which served as study reference method. Overall, 119 patients were enrolled with an antenatal and intrapartum Group B Streptococcus colonization prevalence of 12.9% and 11.8%, respectively. Compared to intrapartum culture, the Revogene GBS DS assay had a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 99.1%, while the antenatal culture displayed a sensitivity 78.6% of and specificity of 96.2%. The Revogene GBS DS assay displayed an acceptable performance according to the European Group B Streptococcus consensus recommendations. Complementary studies in clinical practice are needed to confirm these findings.

Multicentre interlaboratory analysis of routine susceptibility testing with a challenge panel of resistant strains.

OBJECTIVES: In order to elaborate a new national challenge panel of resistant Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci strains for the validation of routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods, an interlaboratory evaluation was organised. METHODS: The results of 12 well-characterised multidrug-resistant strains tested by nine laboratories using local disk diffusion (DD) and automated AST (AUST) methods were compared with the reference broth microdilution method. RESULTS: Overall categorical agreement ranged from 70% to 100% both for DD and AUST and was >90% for all but one strain for all antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Our multicentre AST study showed good reproducibility and the panel can be used as national resistant reference strains for routine AST validation.

Evaluation of Two Rapid Antigenic Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Nasopharyngeal Swabs.

(1) Background: In the current context of the COVID-19 crisis, there is a need for fast, easy-to-use, and sensitive diagnostic tools in addition to molecular methods. We have therefore decided to evaluate the performance of newly available antigen detection kits in "real-life" laboratory conditions. (2) Methods: The sensitivity and specificity of two rapid diagnostic tests (RDT)-the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip from Coris Bioconcept, Belgium (CoRDT), and the coronavirus antigen rapid test cassette from Healgen Scientific, LLC, USA (HeRDT)-were evaluated on 193 nasopharyngeal samples using RT-PCR as the gold standard. (3) Results: The sensitivity obtained for HeRDT was 88% for all collected samples and 91.1% for samples with Ct ≤ 31. For the CoRDT test, the sensitivity obtained was 62% for all collected samples and 68.9% for samples with Ct ≤ 31. (4) Conclusions: Despite the excellent specificity obtained for both kits, the poor sensitivity of the CoRDT did not allow for its use in the rapid diagnosis of COVID-19. HeRDT satisfied the World Health Organization's performance criteria for rapid antigen detection tests. Its high sensitivity, quick response, and ease of use allowed for the implementation of HeRDT at the laboratory of the University Hospital of Liège.

Human Stool Metabolome Differs upon 24 h Blood Pressure Levels and Blood Pressure Dipping Status: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.

Dysbiosis of gut microbiota (GM) has been involved in the pathophysiology of arterial hypertension (HT), via a putative role of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Its role in the circadian regulation of blood pressure (BP), also called "the dipping profile", has been poorly investigated. Sixteen male volunteers and 10 female partners were subjected to 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring and were categorized in normotensive (NT) versus HT, as well as in dippers versus non-dippers. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomics was performed on stool samples. A 5-year comparative follow-up of BP profiles and stool metabolomes was done in men. Significant correlations between stool metabolome and 24 h mean BP levels were found in both male and female cohorts and in the entire cohort (R2 = 0.72, R2 = 0.79, and R2 = 0.45, respectively). Multivariate analysis discriminated dippers versus non-dippers in both male and female cohorts and in the entire cohort (Q2 = 0.87, Q2 = 0.98, and Q2 = 0.68, respectively). Fecal amounts of acetate, propionate, and butyrate were higher in HT versus NT patients (p = 0.027; p = 0.015 and p = 0.015, respectively), as well as in non-dippers versus dippers (p = 0.027, p = 0.038, and p = 0.036, respectively) in the entire cohort. SCFA levels were significantly different in patients changing of dipping status over the 5-year follow-up. In conclusion, stool metabolome changes upon global and circadian BP profiles in both genders.

Continuous infusion, therapeutic drug monitoring and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with ceftazidime/avibactam: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Based on recent pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) evidence, continuous-infusion (CI) ß-lactam administration is increasingly recommended for serious infections. Since 2016, the combination ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is administered as per the manufacturer's instructions as an intermittent infusion of 2.5 g every 8 h. Thus, CI has not yet been evaluated in clinical trials. METHODS: We aimed to evaluate the use of CI of CAZ/AVI in a retrospective case series from December 2016 to October 2019. All isolates displayed in vitro susceptibility to CAZ/AVI according to EUCAST definitions. Patients were initially given CAZ/AVI as CI of 5 g every 12 h, and dosages were adjusted according to therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftazidime with a therapeutic goal of ≥4-5 × MIC in plasma and/or at the site of infection. RESULTS: CAZ/AVI was administered by CI in 10 patients with infections mainly caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (54.5%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (36.4%). Bacteraemia occurred in 30% of cases. Sepsis or septic shock was present in 20% of cases. CAZ/AVI was used as monotherapy in 60% of cases. Clinical cure and microbiological eradication were achieved in 80% and 90% of cases, respectively. The 30-day mortality after CAZ/AVI treatment onset was 10%. The therapeutic goals of ≥4-5 × MIC in plasma and/or at the site of infection were achieved in 100% and 87.5% of cases, respectively, without adverse events. CONCLUSION: Despite a limited number of patients, CI of CAZ/AVI provided promising results after optimisation of PK/PD parameters both in plasma and at the site of infection.

Comparison of the Quantitative DiaSorin Liaison Antigen Test to Reverse Transcription-PCR for the Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Outpatients.

We evaluated the quantitative DiaSorin Liaison severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen test in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals consulting their general practitioners (GPs) during a period of stable intense virus circulation (213/100,000 habitants per day). Leftover reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) positive (n = 204) and negative (n = 210) nasopharyngeal samples were randomly selected among fresh routine samples collected from patients consulting their GPs. Samples were tested on Liaison XL according to the manufacturer's instructions. Equivocal results were considered negative. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the Liaison antigen test compared to RT-PCR were 65.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58.9% to 71.9%) and 100% (CI, 97.8% to 100%). Sensitivity in samples with viral loads of ≥105, ≥104, and ≥103 copies/ml were 100% (CI, 96.3% to 100.0%), 96.5% (CI, 91.8% to 98.7%), and 87.4% (CI, 81.3% to 91.5%), respectively. All samples with ≤103 copies/ml were antigen negative. The ratio of antigen concentration to viral load in samples with ≥103 copies/ml was comparable in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals (P = 0.58). The proportion of RT-PCR-positive participants with a high viral load (≥105 copies/ml) was not significantly higher in symptomatic than in asymptomatic participants (63.9% [CI, 54.9% to 72.0%] versus 51.9% [CI, 41.1% to 62.6%]; P = 0.11), but the proportion of participants with a low viral load (<103 copies/ml) was significantly higher in asymptomatic than in symptomatic RT-PCR-positive participants (35.4% [CI, 25.8% to 46.4%] versus 14.3% [CI, 9.0% to 21.8%]; P < 0.01). Sensitivity and specificity in samples with a viral load of ≥104 copies/ml were 96.5% and 100%. The correlation of antigen concentration with viral load was comparable in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.

Multicenter study of automated systems for colistin susceptibility testing.

PURPOSE: Broth microdilution (BMD) stays as the reference testing method for determination of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) to colistin and is considered essential for patient management and for monitoring of colistin resistance. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the performance of automated systems for colistin AST among Enterobacterales as an alternative for BMD since the majority of laboratories use automated systems as first-line method. METHODS: Twenty colistin resistant (COL-R) including 10 MCR producers and 10 colistin-susceptible (COL-S) Enterobacterales isolates were blindly tested for colistin susceptibility with the routine automated AST systems used by 8 laboratories (3 with BD Phoenix, 3 with Vitek2 and 2 with MicroScan). Additionally, 3 reference strains (E. coli ATCC 25922, E. coli NCTC 13846, and one COL-R mcr-negative K. pneumoniae M/14750) were tested in triplicate by each laboratory. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Results were compared with BMD performed at the reference laboratory. BD Phoenix and MicroScan automated AST systems provide accurate and reproducible categorical results for the testing of colistin in Enterobacterales. However, Vitek2 system showed poor performance for the detection of COL-R isolates especially those with MICs close to the susceptibility breakpoint (categorical agreement of 88% and precision categorical agreement of 81%).

Gut Microbiota and Fecal Levels of Short-Chain Fatty Acids Differ Upon 24-Hour Blood Pressure Levels in Men.

Gut microbiota may influence blood pressure (BP), namely via end products of carbohydrate fermentation. After informed consent, male volunteers were prospectively categorized into 3 groups upon European Society of Hypertension criteria based on 24-hour ambulatory BP measurements: (1) hypertension, (2) borderline hypertension, and (3) normotension. Stool, urine and serum samples were collected in fasting conditions. Gut microbiota was characterized by 16S amplicon sequencing. Metabolomics, including quantification of short-chain fatty acids, was conducted using nuclear magnetic resonance. Two-way ANOVA combined with Tukey post hoc test, as well as multiple permutation test and Benjamini-Hochberg-Yekutieli false discovery rate procedure, was used. The cohort included 54 males: 38 hypertensive (including 21 under treatment), 7 borderline, and 9 normotensive. No significant difference was observed between groups concerning age, body mass index, smoking habits, and weekly alcohol consumption. The genus Clostridium sensu stricto 1 positively correlated with BP levels in nontreated patients (n=33). This correlation was significant after multiple permutation tests but was not substantiated following false discovery rate adjustment. Short-chain fatty acid levels were significantly different among groups, with higher stool levels of acetate, butyrate, and propionate in hypertensive versus normotensive individuals. No difference was observed in serum and urine metabolomes. Correlation between stool metabolome and 24-hour BP levels was evidenced, with R2 reaching 0.9. Our pilot study based on 24-hour ambulatory BP measurements, 16S amplicon sequencing, and metabolomics supports an association between gut microbiota and BP homeostasis, with changes in stool abundance of short-chain fatty acids.

Evaluation of the Abbott RealTime quantitative CMV and EBV assays using the maxCycle protocol in a laboratory automation context.

Real-time PCR are often used for the diagnosis and monitoring of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections in susceptible populations. In this context, we evaluated the analytical performances of the Abbott RealTime CMV/EBV maxCycle protocol automated on the m2000 platform (Abbott). It was compared to our routinely-used procedure consisting of a NucleoMag® DNA extraction automated on a STARlet platform followed by manually processed CMV and EBV quantitative real-time PCR (Diagenode). In this study, we showed that both EBV assays exhibited a similar sensitivity but with a better precision for the EBV Abbott RealTime assay. For the CMV performances, the Abbott assay was more sensitive and more precise than our routine method. The use of WHO International Standards also indicated a slight underestimation of the viral loads (-0.25 log10 IU/mL and -0.21 log10 IU/mL for CMV and EBV assays respectively) while these were rather overestimated with the Starlet/Diagenode method (0.48 log10 IU/mL and 0.19 log10 IU/mL for CMV and EBV assays respectively). These trends were confirmed using relevant whole-blood clinical samples and external quality controls. The workflows were also compared and we highlighted a significant technician hands-on time reduction (-63%) using the Abbott CMV/EBV maxCycle automated protocol.

Modelled target attainment after meropenem infusion in patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia: the PROMESSE study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to propose an optimal treatment regimen of meropenem in critically ill patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 55 patients in intensive care treated with 1 g of meropenem every 8 h for severe nosocomial pneumonia, 30 were assigned to intermittent infusion (II; over 0.5 h) and 25 to extended infusion (EI; over 3 h) groups. Based on plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations determined at steady-state, pharmacokinetic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations were undertaken to assess the probability of attaining drug concentrations above the MIC for 40%-100% of the time between doses (%T > 1-fold and 4-fold MIC), for 1 or 2 g administered by either method. RESULTS: Penetration ratio, measured by the ELF/plasma ratio of AUCs, was statistically higher in the EI group than in the II group (mean ± SEM: 0.29 ± 0.030 versus 0.20 ± 0.033, P = 0.047). Considering a maximum susceptibility breakpoint of 2 mg/L, all dosages and modes of infusions achieved 40%-100% T > 1-fold MIC in plasma, but none did so in ELF, and only the 2 g dose over EI achieved 40%-100% T > 4-fold MIC in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: The optimum regimen to treat severe nosocomial pneumonia was 2 g of meropenem infused over 3 h every 8 h. This regimen achieved the highest pharmacodynamic targets both in plasma and in ELF.

Fatal alveolar echinococcosis of the lumbar spine.

For the last 10 years, the southern part of Belgium has been recognized as a low-risk area of endemicity for alveolar echinococcosis. This infection, caused by Echinococcus multilocularis, usually induces a severe liver condition and can sometimes spread to other organs. However, alveolar echinococcosis involving bones has been described only very rarely. Here, a fatal case of spondylodiscitis due to E. multilocularis contracted in southern Belgium is reported.

Direct identification of bacteria from BacT/ALERT anaerobic positive blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS: MALDI Sepsityper kit versus an in-house saponin method for bacterial extraction.

In cases of bacteraemia, a rapid species identification of the causal agent directly from positive blood culture broths could assist clinicians in the timely targeting of empirical antimicrobial therapy. For this purpose, we evaluated the direct identification of micro-organisms from BacT/ALERT (bioMérieux) anaerobic positive blood cultures without charcoal using the Microflex matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time of flight MS (Bruker), after bacterial extraction by using two different methods: the MALDI Sepsityper kit (Bruker) and an in-house saponin lysis method. Bruker's recommended criteria for identification were expanded in this study, with acceptance of the species identification when the first three results with the best matches with the MALDI Biotyper database were identical, whatever the scores were. In total, 107 monobacterial cultures and six polymicrobial cultures from 77 different patients were included in this study. Among monomicrobial cultures, we identified up to the species level 67 and 66 % of bacteria with the MALDI Sepsityper kit and the saponin method, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two extraction methods. The direct species identification was particularly inconclusive for Gram-positive bacteria, as only 58 and 52 % of them were identified to the species level with the MALDI Sepsityper kit and the saponin method, respectively. Results for Gram-negative bacilli were better, with 82.5 and 90 % of correct identification to the species level with the MALDI Sepsityper kit and the saponin method, respectively. No misidentifications were given by the direct procedures when compared with identifications provided by the conventional method. Concerning the six polymicrobial blood cultures, whatever the extraction method used, a correct direct identification was only provided for one of the isolated bacteria on solid medium in all cases. The analysis of the time-to-result demonstrated a reduction in the turnaround time for identification ranging from 1 h 06 min to 24 h 44 min, when performing the blood culture direct identification in comparison with the conventional method, whatever the extraction method.