Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 82(3): 366-70, 1999 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10434817

RESUMO

We have compared patient-controlled epidural fentanyl (PCEF) and patient-controlled i.v. morphine (PCIM) after Caesarean section in 84 patients, in a randomized, double-blind study. All patients had an epidural and an i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device, one of which delivered normal saline. Group PCEF received epidural fentanyl 20 micrograms with a 10-min lockout. Group PCIM received i.v. morphine 1 mg with a 5-min lockout. PCA use was lower for PCEF patients (P = 0.0007). The highest pain score recorded at rest for PCEF patients was median 20 (interquartile range 10-33) mm compared with 32 (14-52) mm for PCIM patients (P = 0.02). The highest pain score recorded on coughing was 31 (21-41) mm with PCEF compared with 56 (30-71) mm for PCIM (P = 0.001). There was less nausea (P = 0.02) and drowsiness (P = 0.0003) with PCEF. There was no difference in the overall incidence and severity of pruritus (P = 0.77). However, pruritus started earlier with PCEF.


Assuntos
Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Cesárea , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Analgesia Epidural , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Fentanila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Medição da Dor , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/induzido quimicamente , Gravidez , Prurido/induzido quimicamente
2.
Br J Anaesth ; 74(2): 184-7, 1995 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7696069

RESUMO

This randomized, double-blind study of 40 patients was designed to determine if the predominant analgesic effect of extradural fentanyl is mediated by a direct spinal action or an indirect systemic one. After Caesarean section, postoperative analgesia was provided for 24 h by patient-controlled extradural analgesia (PCEA group) or by patient-controlled i.v. analgesia (PCIVA group). Both groups received a bolus dose of fentanyl 20 micrograms with a 10-min lockout interval. In the PCIVA group, nine patients stopped early (compared with none in the PCEA group) because of inadequate analgesia. Mean visual analogue pain scores (0-100 mm) at 8 and 12 h were lower for PCEA (23 (sd 13) mm at rest, 31 (23) mm on coughing) than for PCIVA (50 (25) mm at rest, 67 (24) mm on coughing) (P < 0.0005). The mean dose of fentanyl self-administered between 4 and 8 h was lower in the PCEA group (38 (sd 30) micrograms h-1) compared with the PCIVA group (59 (27) micrograms h-1) (P < 0.05). Our results support the hypothesis that the predominant analgesic effect of extradural administration of fentanyl is mediated by a direct spinal action rather than an indirect action from systemic absorption.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Analgesia Obstétrica , Fentanila/administração & dosagem , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente , Cesárea , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...