Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Surg ; 148(10): 924-31, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23945834

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Severe renal injuries after blunt trauma cause diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for the treating clinicians. The need for an operative vs a nonoperative approach is debated. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate, causes, predictors, and consequences of failure of nonoperative management (NOM) in grade IV and grade V blunt renal injuries (BRIs). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Twelve level I and II trauma centers in New England. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 206 adult patients with a grade IV or V BRI who were admitted between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2011. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Failure of NOM, defined as the need for a delayed operation or death due to renal-related complications during NOM. RESULTS: Of 206 patients, 52 (25.2%) were operated on immediately, and 154 (74.8%) were managed nonoperatively (with the assistance of angiographic embolization for 25 patients). Nonoperative management failed for 12 of the 154 patients (7.8%) and was related to kidney injury in 10 (6.5%). None of these 10 patients had complications because of the delay in BRI management. The mean (SD) time from admission to failure was 17.6 (27.4) hours (median time, 7.5 hours; range, 4.5-102 hours), and the cause was hemodynamic instability in 10 of the 12 patients (83.3%). Multivariate analysis identified 2 independent predictors of NOM failure: older than 55 years of age and a road traffic crash as the mechanism of injury. When both risk factors were present, NOM failure occurred for 27.3% of the patients; when both were absent, there were no NOM failures. Of the 142 patients successfully managed nonoperatively, 46 (32.4%) developed renal-related complications, including hematuria (24 patients), urinoma (15 patients), urinary tract infection (8 patients), renal failure (7 patients), and abscess (2 patients). These patients were managed successfully with no loss of renal units (ie, kidneys). The renal salvage rate was 76.2% for the entire population and 90.3% among patients selected for NOM. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Hemodynamically stable patients with a grade IV or V BRI were safely managed nonoperatively. Nonoperative management failed for only 6.5% of patients owing to renal-related injuries, and three-fourths of the entire population retained their kidneys.


Assuntos
Rim/lesões , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismo Múltiplo , New England/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Salvação , Fatores de Tempo , Centros de Traumatologia , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/classificação , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia
2.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 73(2): 447-51, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22846954

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been used for to treat wounds for more than 15 years and, more recently, has been used to secure split-thickness skin grafts. There are some data to support this use of NPWT, but the actual mechanism by which NPWT speeds healing or improves skin graft take is not entirely known. The purpose of this project was to assess whether NPWT improved angiogenesis, wound healing, or graft survival when compared with traditional bolster dressings securing split-thickness skin grafts in a porcine model. METHODS: We performed two split-thickness skin grafts on each of eight 30 kg Yorkshire pigs. We took graft biopsies on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 and submitted the samples for immunohistochemical staining, as well as standard hematoxylin and eosin staining. We measured the degree of vascular ingrowth via immunohistochemical staining for von Willenbrand's factor to better identify blood vessel epithelium. We determined the mean cross-sectional area of blood vessels present for each representative specimen, and then compared the bolster and NPWT samples. We also assessed each graft for incorporation and survival at postoperative day 10. RESULTS: Our analysis of the data revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the degree of vascular ingrowth as measured by mean cross-sectional capillary area (p = 0.23). We did not note any difference in graft survival or apparent incorporation on a macroscopic level, although standard hematoxylin and eosin staining indicated that microscopically, there seemed to be better subjective graft incorporation in the NPWT samples and a nonsignificant trend toward improved graft survival in the NPWT group. CONCLUSION: We were unable to demonstrate a significant difference in vessel ingrowth when comparing NPWT and traditional bolster methods for split-thickness skin graft fixation. More studies are needed to elucidate the manner by which NPWT exerts its effects and the true clinical magnitude of these effects.


Assuntos
Neovascularização Fisiológica/fisiologia , Transplante de Pele/métodos , Cicatrização/fisiologia , Fator de von Willebrand/metabolismo , Análise de Variância , Animais , Bandagens , Biomarcadores/análise , Biópsia por Agulha , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Rejeição de Enxerto , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Imuno-Histoquímica , Distribuição Aleatória , Valores de Referência , Pele/patologia , Transplante de Pele/efeitos adversos , Sus scrofa , Suínos
3.
J Trauma ; 71(5): 1126-9, 2011 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22071918

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clavicle fractures historically have been managed without internal fixation. Current literature is raising questions regarding this management as opposed to offering operative fixation in some instances. This study addresses the use of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcomes measure to identify those that have the least satisfaction with nonoperative care of the clavicle fracture based upon clavicular deformity and variation in fracture location based upon Allman Classification. METHODS: Patients having suffered clavicle fractures were mailed the DASH Outcomes Questionnaire to be completed and returned. A total of 113 surveys were returned completed with 92 being of value for evaluation. Patient chest or clavicle radiographs were evaluated, and measurements were made of the clavicle fractures for amount of separation or shortening and grade according to Allman Classification. Statistical evaluation compared DASH Scores (patient satisfaction as outcome measure) to the Allman Classification and the degree of separation or shortening. Comparison of categorical variables was performed using Fisher's exact test. Comparison of continuous variables was preformed using Student's t test. Statistical significance was demonstrated by a p value of less than 0.05. RESULTS: Patients with clavicular shortening of greater than 2 cm were found to have the highest DASH score indicating dissatisfaction and disability with their outcome postinjury (p = 0.0001). Separation or lengthening seemed to be associated with lower DASH Scores. Patients with Allmen Classification I (midshaft clavicle) fractures had higher DASH score than other fracture locations (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with midshaft clavicle fractures with shortening of greater than 2 cm may be good candidates for operative repair given the degree of dissatisfaction with nonoperative management of these fractures as assessed by long-term outcome measures of disability.


Assuntos
Clavícula/lesões , Avaliação da Deficiência , Fraturas Ósseas/fisiopatologia , Fraturas Ósseas/terapia , Satisfação do Paciente , Braço/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Ombro/fisiopatologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Arch Surg ; 145(5): 432-7, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20479340

RESUMO

HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that patient factors, injury patterns, and therapeutic interventions influence outcomes among older patients incurring traumatic chest injuries. DESIGN: Patients older than 50 years with at least 1 rib fracture (RF) were retrospectively studied, including institutional data, patient data, clinical interventions, and complications. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. SETTING: Eight trauma centers. PATIENTS: A total of 1621 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Survival. RESULTS: Patient data collected include the following: age (mean, 70.1 years), number of RFs (mean, 3.7), Abbreviated Injury Scale chest score (mean, 2.7), Injury Severity Score (mean, 11.7), and mortality (overall, 4.6%). On univariable analysis, increased mortality was associated with admission to high-volume trauma centers and level I centers, preexisting coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure, intubation or development of pneumonia, and increasing age, Injury Severity Score, and number of RFs. On multivariable analysis, strongest predictors of mortality were admission to high-volume trauma centers, preexisting congestive heart failure, intubation, and increasing age and Injury Severity Score. Using this predictive model, tracheostomy and patient-controlled analgesia had protective effects on survival. CONCLUSIONS: In a large regional trauma cooperative, increasing age and Injury Severity Score were independent predictors of survival among older patients incurring traumatic RFs. Admission to high-volume trauma centers, preexisting congestive heart failure, and intubation added to mortality. Therapies associated with improved survival were patient-controlled analgesia and tracheostomy. Further regional cooperation should allow development of standard care practices for these challenging patients.


Assuntos
Fraturas das Costelas/mortalidade , Fraturas das Costelas/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/mortalidade , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações
5.
Arch Surg ; 145(5): 456-60, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20479344

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate and predictors of failure of nonoperative management (NOM) in grade IV and V blunt splenic injuries (BSI). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Fourteen trauma centers in New England. PATIENTS: A total of 388 adult patients with a grade IV or V BSI who were admitted between January 1, 2001, and August 31, 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure of NOM (f-NOM). RESULTS: A total of 164 patients (42%) were operated on immediately. Of the remaining 224 who were offered a trial of NOM, the treatment failed in 85 patients (38%). At the end, 64% of patients required surgery. Multivariate analysis identified 2 independent predictors of f-NOM: grade V BSI and the presence of a brain injury. The likelihood of f-NOM was 32% if no predictor was present, 56% if 1 was present, and 100% if both were present. The mortality of patients for whom NOM failed was almost 7-fold higher than those with successful NOM (4.7% vs 0.7%; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly two-thirds of patients with grade IV or V BSI require surgery. A grade V BSI and brain injury predict failure of NOM. This data must be taken into account when generalizations are made about the overall high success rates of NOM, which do not represent severe BSI.


Assuntos
Baço/lesões , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/patologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New England , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Esplenectomia , Centros de Traumatologia , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Falha de Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Adulto Jovem
6.
J Trauma ; 62(2): 397-403, 2007 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17297331

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is insufficient knowledge of infectious risk in patients after splenectomy; minimal data exists specifically for trauma patients. This study evaluated patient knowledge and practices regarding infection risk after traumatic splenectomy. Our hypothesis was that patients with poor knowledge regarding their asplenic state would be less likely to pursue medical care in the event of an illness than those with good knowledge. METHODS: Non-randomized, cohort study of all posttraumatic splenectomy patients < or =11 years after injury in 2 rural trauma centers. Patients received a validated questionnaire; weighted responses determined knowledge about infection risks and appropriate follow-up actions. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of patients responded to the questionnaire. Overall, 47% of responders were identified as having adequate knowledge regarding infectious risk, and only 28% would pursue appropriate medical care. Of patients with adequate knowledge, 42% were more likely to pursue appropriate care versus 15% of patients with inadequate knowledge (p = 0.06). Patients with adequate knowledge were more likely to receive an annual influenza vaccine (p = 0.03) and contact their provider with fewer symptoms (p = 0.03). Logistic regression revealed significant interactions between knowledge and presence of comorbidities (p = 0.04). Focusing on patients with poor knowledge and absence of comorbidities, none would engage in appropriate action in the event of illness (p < 0.01). A longer time since injury, >3 years, was associated with a diminished likelihood of appropriate action (p = 0.03). The relationship between knowledge and action was not accounted for by other potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma patients retain minimal knowledge about infection risk after splenectomy and are not likely to pursue appropriate medical care. Time since injury negatively influences patient actions. Healthcare providers must be more proactive to develop new strategies in educating these patients, particularly those without comorbidities and those greater than 3 years postsplenectomy.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/psicologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Esplenectomia , Adulto , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismo Múltiplo , Fatores de Risco , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...