Treatment of head and neck paragangliomas with external beam radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the outcomes of radiation therapy in patients with head and neck paragangliomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1990 to 2009, 66 patients with 81 head and neck paragangliomas were treated by conventional external beam radiation therapy in 25 fractions at a median dose of 45 Gy (range, 41.4-68 Gy). One case was malignant. The median gross target volume and planning target volume were 30 cm(3) (range, 0.9-243 cm(3)) and 116 cm(3) (range, 24-731 cm(3)), respectively. Median age was 57.4 years (range, 15-84 years). Eleven patients had multicentric lesions, and 8 had family histories of paraganglioma. Paragangliomas were located in the temporal bone, the carotid body, and the glomus vagal in 51, 18, and 10 patients, respectively. Forty-six patients had exclusive radiation therapy, and 20 had salvage radiation therapy. The median follow-up was 4.1 years (range, 0.1-21.2 years). RESULTS: One patient had a recurrence of temporal bone paraganglioma 8 years after treatment. The actuarial local control rates were 100% at 5 years and 98.7% at 10 years. Patients with multifocal tumors and family histories were significantly younger (42 years vs 58 years [P=.002] and 37 years vs 58 years [P=.0003], respectively). The association between family predisposition and multifocality was significant (P<.001). Two patients had cause-specific death within the 6 months after irradiation. During radiation therapy, 9 patients required hospitalization for weight loss, nausea, mucositis, or ophthalmic zoster. Two late vascular complications occurred (middle cerebral artery and carotid stenosis), and 2 late radiation-related meningiomas appeared 15 and 18 years after treatment. CONCLUSION: Conventional external beam radiation therapy is an effective and safe treatment option that achieves excellent local control; it should be considered as a first-line treatment of choice for head and neck paragangliomas.

Subcutaneous compared with intravenous administration of amifostine in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy: final results of the GORTEC2000-02 phase III randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To compare compliance with and efficacy of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) amifostine for the treatment of patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, who were eligible for radiotherapy and who were not receiving concurrent chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive either IV amifostine (200 mg/m(2) daily for 3 minutes, 15 to 30 minutes before irradiation) or SC amifostine (500 mg; two sites; 20 to 60 minutes before irradiation). The primary end point was late xerostomia at 1 year as indicated by unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates, a patient benefit questionnaire score, and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) late toxicity grade. RESULTS: Results for IV (n = 143) versus SC (n = 148) administration were as follows. There was no significant difference in compliance (69% for IV v 71% for SC) in patients receiving a full dose of amifostine. Reasons for dose reduction were acute toxicity (25% for IV v 27% for SC; P = .51) and logistics (18% for IV v 9% for SC administration; P = .09). Acute toxicity differed significantly in terms of grade 1 to 2 hypotension (19% for IV v 8% for SC; P = .01), grade 1 to 2 skin rash (9% for IV v 21% for SC; P = .01), and local pain (0% for IV v 8% for SC; P = .003). The incidence of grade 2 or greater xerostomia was significantly higher for patients who received amifostine via SC administration (37% for IV v 62% for SC; P = .005) in the 127 patients (n = 67, IV; n = 60, SC) evaluable at 1 year but not at 2 or 3 years (36% for IV v 51% for SC administration; P = .19; 32% for IV v 41% for SC; P = .63). A generalized linear mixed-model analysis of all data revealed no significant difference in patient self-assessment of salivary function (P = .25), unstimulated or stimulated salivary flow rates (P = .054 and .82, respectively), or grade 2 or greater xerostomia (P = .23). CONCLUSION: SC amifostine administration was not significantly superior to IV amifostine administration in terms of patient compliance or efficacy.

Evolving concepts in the management of jugular paraganglioma: a comparison of radiotherapy and surgery in 88 cases.

Surgery for jugular paraganglioma (PGL) tumors often results in the acquisition of neurological deficits where none had been present previously. This has a significant impact on the quality of life. Radiotherapy is a recognized alternative therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the results of radiotherapy and surgery for the management of jugular PGL in terms of function and tumor control to define a treatment algorithm. We conducted a retrospective and comparative analysis of the treatment of 41 patients by conventional radiotherapy and 47 patients by surgery via tertiary referral at an academic medical center. Forty-seven patients with type C and/or D jugular PGLs (mean age, 46 years) underwent surgery after endovascular embolization between 1984 and 1998 using an infratemporal fossa type A approach. The facial nerve was transposed in 18 patients. An adjunctive neurosurgical procedure was required in 14 patients. Mean follow-up was 66 months (range, 17 months to 14 years). Forty-one patients with type C jugular PGLs (mean age, 59.5 years) were treated by external beam or conformational radiotherapy between 1988 and 2003 with a total mean dose of 45 Gy (range, 44 to 50 Gy). Mean follow-up was 50 months (range, 18 months to 13 years). The primary outcome measures were tumor control and cranial nerve status. Surgical resection, total or subtotal, yielded an overall 86% rate of either cure or tumor stabilization. Radiotherapy achieved local control in 96% of patients. For surgery, the main postoperative complications were dysphagia, aspiration, and facial paralysis. Patients treated by radiotherapy developed minor disabilities. We concluded that radiotherapy and surgery achieve similar oncologic outcomes, but the former achieves tumor control with less morbidity. Our data favor radiotherapy as treatment for jugular PGLs, but we acknowledge that the aims of these two treatment modalities are different, namely, eradication of tumor by surgery versus stabilization of tumor with radiotherapy. The search for the better quality of life has to be weighed against the uncertainty of the long-term behavior of the tumor.

Randomized clinical trial of post-operative radiotherapy versus concomitant carboplatin and radiotherapy for head and neck cancers with lymph node involvement.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Post-operative radiotherapy is indicated for the treatment of head and neck cancers. In vitro, chemotherapy potentiates the cytotoxic effects of radiation. We report the results of a randomized trial testing post-operative radiotherapy alone versus concomitant carboplatin and radiotherapy for head and neck cancers with lymph node involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for head and neck cancers with histological evidence of lymph node involvement. Patients were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone (54-72Gy, 30-40 fractions, 6-8 weeks) or identical treatment plus concomitant Carboplatin (50mg/m(2) administered by IV infusion twice weekly). RESULTS: Between February 1994 and June 2002, 144 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 106 months (95% confidence interval (CI) [92-119]), the 2-year rate of loco-regional control was 73% (95% CI: 0.61-0.84) in the combined treatment group and 68% (95% CI: 0.57-0.80) in the radiotherapy group (p=0.26). Overall survival did not differ significantly between groups (hazard ratio for death, 1.05; 95% CI: 0.69-1.60; p=0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Twice-weekly administration of carboplatin concomitant to post-operative radiotherapy did not improve local control or overall survival rates in this population of patients with node-positive head and neck cancers.