Toward global standards for comparator pharmaceutical products: case studies of amoxicillin, metronidazole, and zidovudine in the Americas.

This study compared in vitro dissolution characteristics and other quality measures of different amoxicillin, metronidazole, and zidovudine products purchased in the Americas to a comparator pharmaceutical product (CPP). These three drugs are classified as Biopharmaceutics Classification System Class I drugs with the possibility that dissolution findings might be used to document bioequivalence. All investigated zidovudine products were found to be in vitro equivalent to the CPP. Only 3 of 12 tested amoxicillin products were found to be in vitro equivalent to the CPP. None of the tested metronidazole products were in vitro equivalent to the CPP. These findings suggest but do not confirm bioinequivalence where in vitro comparisons failed, given that an in vivo blood level study might have confirmed bioequivalence. At times, identifying a CPP in one of the selected markets proved difficult. The study demonstrates that products sold across national markets may not be bioequivalent. When coupled with the challenge of identifying a CPP in different countries, the results of this study suggest the value of an international CPP as well as increased use of BCS approaches as means of either documenting bioequivalence or signaling the need for further in vivo studies. Because of increased movement of medicines across national borders, practitioners and patients would benefit from these approaches.

Establishing new acceptance limits for dissolution performance verification of USPC apparatus 1 and 2 using USPC prednisone tablets reference standard.

PURPOSE: On 1 March 2010, the US Pharmacopeial Convention released into commerce Lot P1I300 of its Prednisone Tablets Reference Standard for use in periodic performance verification testing (PVT) of dissolution Apparatus 1 and 2. This report presents the collaborative study data, development of the acceptance limits, and results from supporting work for this Lot. METHODS: The collaborative study involved 25 collaborators who provided data for Apparatus 1 and 31 who provided data for Apparatus 2. These limits are for the geometric mean and percent coefficient of variation (%CV) instead of per-individual results as for prior lots. Stability of results and sensitivity to test performance parameters were also studied. RESULTS: To determine new PVT acceptance limits, the authors calculated geometric mean and variance components as percent coefficient of variation. The move to the geometric mean and %CV criteria brings the acceptance criteria in line with current accepted statistics and provides a more realistic assessment of the system's performance. Results for Apparatus 1 are stable over time, but for Apparatus 2, the mean decreases over time. Acceptance criteria are adjusted for this trend. Lot P1 demonstrates sensitivity to test performance parameters (vessels and degassing). CONCLUSIONS: Apparatus 1 results are stable over time. Those in Apparatus 2 show a decrease over time in the geometric mean but show no trend in variability. The current tablets are shown to remain sensitive to two operational parameters, degassing and vessel dimensions, not covered by mechanical calibration. The new acceptance limits for Lot P1 are based on geometric mean and %CV for Prednisone Tablets Reference Standard Lot P1I300. The limits better control variability than the prior per-individual-result limits.

Metal impurities in food and drugs.

The major metals of potential health concern found in food, drugs (medicines), and dietary supplements are lead, cadmium, mercury, and arsenic. Other metals, such as chromium, copper, manganese, molybdenum, vanadium, nickel, osmium, rhodium, ruthenium, iridium, palladium, and platinum, may be used or introduced during manufacturing and may be controlled in the final article as impurities. Screening for metals in medicines and dietary supplements rarely indicates the presence of toxic metal impurities at levels of concern. The setting of heavy metal limits is appropriate for medicines and is appropriate for supplements when heavy metals are likely or certain to contaminate a given product. Setting reasonable health-based limits for some of these metals is challenging because of their ubiquity in the environment, limitations of current analytical procedures, and other factors. Taken together, compendial tests for metals in food and drugs present an array of issues that challenge compendial scientists.

Workshop report and follow-up--AAPS Workshop on current topics in GLP bioanalysis: Assay reproducibility for incurred samples--implications of Crystal City recommendations.

The Conference Report of the 3rd AAPS/FDA Bioanalytical Workshop (Crystal City III) endorsed the concept that assay methods supporting bioanalytical data in submissions must demonstrate assay reproducibility by using incurred samples. The present Workshop was convened to provide a forum for discussion and consensus building about incurred sample assay reproducibility for both nonclinical and clinical studies. Information about current regulatory perspectives on incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) was presented, implications of ISR for both large and small molecules were discussed, and the steering committee put forth recommendations for performing ISR. These recommendations from the Workshop, along with the subsequent evolution of approaches leading to a robust ISR program, may be used by scientists performing bioanalytical assays for regulated studies to provide additional confirmation of assay reproducibility for incurred samples.

Change in criteria for USP dissolution performance verification tests.

The US Pharmacopeial Convention has been evaluating its performance verification tests (PVT) for several years. These tests help ensure the integrity of the US Pharmacopeia performance test when a dissolution procedure, as described in General Chapter Dissolution <711>, is relied upon to test a nonsolution orally administered dosage form. One result of the evaluation is a change in the PVT criterion from one based on individual tablet results to one based on the mean and variability of a set of tablets. This paper describes the new PVT and its criterion and how its acceptance limits are derived from results of a collaborative study, explains a two-stage option for the test, and presents operating characteristics.

Quantitative bioanalytical methods validation and implementation: best practices for chromatographic and ligand binding assays.

The Third AAPS/FDA Bioanalytical Workshop, entitled "Quantitative Bioanalytical Methods Validation and Implementation: Best Practices for Chromatographic and Ligand Binding Assays" was held on May 1-3, 2006 in Arlington, VA. The format of this workshop consisted of presentations on bioanalytical topics, followed by discussion sessions where these topics could be debated, with the goal of reaching consensus, or identifying subjects where addition input or clarification was required. The discussion also addressed bioanalytical validation requirements of regulatory agencies, with the purpose of clarifying expectations for regulatory submissions. The proceedings from each day were reviewed and summarized in the evening sessions among the speakers and moderators of the day. The consensus summary was presented back to the workshop on the last day and was further debated. This communication represents the distillate of the workshop proceedings and provides the summary of consensus reached and also contains the validation topics where no consensus was reached.

Influence of ketoconazole on azimilide pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects.

AIM: To assess the influence of ketoconazole on azimilide pharmacokinetics. METHODS: A two-period randomized crossover study was conducted in healthy male and female subjects (19-45 years). Placebo or 200 mg ketoconazole were administered orally every 24 h for 29 days. On day 8, a single oral dose of 125 mg azimilide dihydrochloride was coadministered following an overnight fast. Blood samples were obtained prior to and for 22 days following azimilide dihydrochloride administration. The plasma protein binding of azimilide was also assessed at 6 h after dosing. RESULTS: Following ketoconazole administration, a 16% increase in azimilide AUC (90% confidence interval (CI) 112%, 120%), a 12% increase in C(max) (95% CI 107%, 116%), a 13% increase in t(1/2,z) (95% CI 107%, 120%) and a 14% decrease in CL(o) (95% CI 82%, 90%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The changes in azimilide pharmacokinetics following ketoconazole treatment are not clinically important since the 90% CI for the AUC fell within the prespecified range of 80-125%. Thus, no clinically important drug interactions are expected when azimilide dihydrochloride is coadministered with CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Influence of azimilide on CYP2C19-mediated metabolism.

The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of multiple-dose oral administration of azimilide dihydrochloride on CYP2C19-mediated metabolism. A two-period, randomized crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy male subjects who were phenotyped as extensive CYP2C19 metabolizers. Oral doses of placebo or 125 mg of azimilide dihydrochloride were administered every 12 hours for 3 days, followed by every 24 hours for 5 days; 20 mg omeprazole was coadministered on Day 8. Blood or plasma samples were obtained over 24 hours and analyzed for azimilide or omeprazole/5-hydroxyomeprazole using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Data were analyzed using "noncompartmental" analysis. Azimilide blood concentrations observed in this study were similar to those previously observed at steady state in patients. Based on AUC(m)/AUC(p) for omeprazole, azimilide does not significantly inhibit CYP2C19-mediated metabolism (90% confidence interval [CI] = 104%-111%). For 5-hydroxyomeprazole, no significant changes in pharmacokinetics were observed. For omeprazole, a statistically significant decrease ( approximately 12%) was observed for AUC. However, this change was small and is not expected to be clinically important since the CI was contained within those used to establish bioequivalence. These results indicate that azimilide does not inhibit CYP2C19-mediated metabolism. Since this isozyme had the lowest in vitro IC(50) values for the cytochrome P450s most commonly involved with the metabolism of drugs (CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4), azimilide-related drug interactions mediated via these isozymes are not anticipated.