Acute and Chronic Sarcoid Arthropathies: Characteristics and Treatments From a Retrospective Nationwide French Study.

Introduction: We aimed to analyze patients with acute and chronic joint involvements in sarcoidosis. Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter analysis of patients with proven sarcoidosis, as defined by clinical, radiological, and histological criteria, with at least one clinical and/or ultrasonographic synovitis. Results: Thirty-nine patients with sarcoid arthropathy were included, and among them 19 had acute sarcoidosis (Lofgren's syndrome). Joint involvement and DAS44-CRP were not significantly different in acute and chronic sarcoid arthropathies. Acute forms were more frequent than chronic sarcoid arthropathy in Caucasians, without any difference of sex or age between these 2 forms. Joint involvement was frequently more symmetrical in acute than chronic forms (100 vs. 70%; p < 0.05), with a more frequent involvement in wrists and ankles in acute forms, whereas the tender and swollen joint counts and the DAS44-CRP were similar between the 2 groups. Skin lesions were significantly more frequent in patients with acute forms [17 (89%) vs. 5 (25%); p < 0.05] and were erythema nodosum in all patients with Löfgren's syndrome and sarcoid skin lesions in those with chronic sarcoidosis. Among 20 patients with chronic sarcoidosis, treatment was used in 17 (85%) cases, and consisted in NSAIDs alone (n = 5; 25%), steroids alone (n = 5; 25%), hydroxychloroquine (n = 2; 20%), methotrexate (n = 3; 15%), and TNF inhibitors (n = 2; 10%). A complete/partial joint response was noted in 14 (70%) cases with a DAS44-CRP reduction of 2.07 [1.85-2.44] (from 3.13 [2.76-3.42] to 1.06 [0.9-1.17]; p < 0.05). Conclusion: Sarcoid arthropathies have different clinical phenotypes in acute and chronic forms and various treatment regimens such as hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate could be used in chronic forms.

Determinants of Patient-Physician Discordance in Global Assessment in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Multicenter European Study.

OBJECTIVE: Patient-physician discordance in global assessment of disease activity concerns one-third of patients, but what does it reflect? We aimed to assess patient-physician discordance in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and patient-reported domains of health (physical and psychological) associated with discordance. METHODS: We analyzed the PsAID (Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease), a cross-sectional, multicenter European study of patients with PsA according to expert opinion. Patient global assessment (PGA) and physician global assessment (PhGA) were rated on a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Discordance was defined as the difference (PGA-PhGA) and as the absolute difference |PGA-PhGA| ≥3 points. Determinants of PGA-PhGA were assessed by a stepwise multivariate linear regression among 12 physical and psychological aspects of impact: pain, skin problems, fatigue, ability to work/leisure, functional incapacity, feeling of discomfort, sleep disturbance, anxiety/fear, coping, embarrassment/shame, social participation, and depressive affects. RESULTS: In 460 patients (mean ± SD age 50.6 ± 12.9 years, 52.2% female, mean ± SD disease duration 9.5 ± 9.5 years, mean ± SD Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis score 30.8 ± 32.4, and 40.4% undergoing treatment with biologic agents), the mean ± SD PGA was higher than the mean PhGA, with a mean absolute difference of 1.9 ± 1.8 points. Discordance defined by |PGA-PhGA| ≥3 of 10 concerned 134 patients (29.1%), and 115 patients (85.8% of the patients with discordance) had PGA>PhGA. Higher fatigue (ß = 0.14), lower self-perceived coping (ß = 0.23), and impaired social participation (ß = 0.16) were independently associated with a higher difference (PGA-PhGA). CONCLUSION: Discordance concerned 29.1% of these patient/physician dyads, mainly by PGA>PhGA. Factors associated with discordance were psychological rather than physical domains of health. Discordance was more frequent in patients in remission, indicating more work is needed on the patient perspective regarding disease activity.

The risk of atrial fibrillation after pneumonectomy is not impaired by preoperative administration of dexamethasone. A cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most frequent complications occurring after thoracic surgery especially after lung resection. It is associated with an increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. Recent data having documented the preventive role of corticosteroids on the occurrence of AF in cardiac surgery, we sought to evaluate the effect of preoperative administration of dexamethasone on the incidence of AF after pneumonectomy. METHODS: We reviewed the files of all consecutive patients who underwent a pneumonectomy in one single centre between July 2004 and July 2012. For each patient, demographics, medical status, the surgical procedure and treatments administered including dexamethasone, were recorded. The data were analysed using a univariate analysis and a multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Among them, 153 patients were included and analysed; 35 (23%) presented with at least one episode of AF occurring within 48hours after surgery. Mortality was higher in these patients (26.5% versus 12.1%, P=0.06). The univariate analysis indicated that patients who had a postoperative course complicated by the occurrence of AF were older (P=0.003), had a higher SAPS2 score (P=0.002) and a higher CHADS score (P=0.05). Older age (OR=1.08; P=0.048) and preoperative treatment by anti-arrhythmics (OR=3.9; P=0.029) were documented as independent risk factors in the multivariate analysis. Preoperative administration of dexamethasone 8-12mg did not impair the incidence of AF. DISCUSSION: AF is a frequent complication after pneumonectomy associated with increased mortality. Whereas corticosteroids have been documented as preventing AF following cardiac surgery, no such effect was found after pneumonectomy.

Patient global assessment in measuring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a review of the literature.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reflect the patient's perspective and are used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) routine clinical practice. Patient global assessment (PGA) is one of the most widely used PROs in RA practice and research and is included in several composite scores such as the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28). PGA is often assessed by a single question with a 0-10 or 0-100 response. The content can vary and relates either to global health (e.g., how is your health overall) or to disease activity (e.g., how active is your arthritis). The wordings used as anchors, i.e., for the score of 0, 10, or 100 according to the scale used, and the timing (i.e., this day or this week) also vary. The different possible ways of measuring PGA translate into variations in its interpretation and reporting and may impact on measures of disease activity and consequently achievement of treat-to-target goals. Furthermore, although PGA is associated with objective measures of disease activity, it is also associated with other aspects of health, such as psychological distress or comorbidities, which leads to situations of discordance between objective RA assessments and PGA. Focusing on the role of PGA, its use and interpretation in RA, this review explores its validity and correlations with other disease measures and its overall value for research and routine clinical practice.

Patient-Physician Discordance in Global Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review With Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The integration of the patient in therapeutic decision-making is important in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the patient opinion regarding disease status may differ from the physician's opinion. The aim of this study was to assess in the published literature the frequency and drivers of patient-physician discordance in global assessment in RA. METHODS: A systematic literature review of all articles published up to January 2015 in Medline or Embase, reporting discordance in RA, was conducted by 2 investigators. Discordance was defined based on the absolute difference of patient global (PGA) and physician global assessments (PhGA) on 0-10-cm scales. The frequency of discordance and its predictors were collected in each study. Frequencies of discordance were pooled by meta-analysis using random effect. RESULTS: In all, 12 studies were selected (i.e., 11,879 patients): weighted mean ± SD age was 55.1 ± 13.9 years, weighted mean ± SD disease duration was 10.4 ± 9.3 years, and 80.7% were women. The value of the difference |PGA - PhGA| defining discordance varied between ≥0.5 cm (n = 2 studies) to ≥3 cm (n = 5 studies); the weighted mean value was 2.7 cm. The pooled percentage of patients with discordance was 43% (95% confidence interval 36%-51%; range 25%-76%). PGA was usually higher than PhGA. The drivers of PGA were pain and functional incapacity, whereas drivers of PhGA were joint counts and acute-phase reactants. CONCLUSION: Discordance in global assessment was most frequently defined as a difference of 3 points or more; even with such a stringent definition, up to half the patients were found to be discordant. The long-term consequences of this discordance remain to be determined.

Patient-physician discordance in global assessment in early spondyloarthritis and its change over time: the DESIR cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To assess patient-physician discordance in global assessment of disease activity in early axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) over time and determinants of discordance. METHODS: DESIR (Devenir des Spondyloarthropathies Indifférenciées Récentes) is a French, multicentre, longitudinal cohort of patients with early inflammatory back pain suggestive of axSpA. Patient global assessment (PGA) and physician global assessment (PhGA) were rated with a 0-10 numerical rating scale, every 6 months during 2 years then at 3 years. Discordance was defined by the absolute difference |PGA-PhGA|≥3 (range 0-10) and was analysed at each visit. Determinants of (PGA-PhGA) were assessed at the visit level by a generalised linear mixed model. RESULTS: A total of 702 patients were analysed at baseline (401 with complete data over 3 years): mean age 33.8±8.6 years, 379 (54.0%) female, mean symptom duration 18.1±10.5 months. Mean PGA values were always higher than mean PhGA values with a mean absolute difference of 1.8 points. At baseline, 202 (28.8%) patients had discordance mainly by PGA>PhGA; over 3 years the frequency of discordance was stable (range 25.5-28.8%). Discordance was not stable at the patient level, 118 (29.4%) patients were discordant once and 88 (22.0%) twice, and only 92 (22.9%) more than twice. Determinants of (PGA-PhGA) were spine pain (ß=0.24, p<0.001) and fatigue (ß=0.13, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Discordance concerned a quarter of patients with early axSpA. Over 3 years of follow-up, discordance did not decrease (no 'reference shift'). Discordance was not a stable trait, indicating discordance is not a patient characteristic.