Effectiveness and tolerability of Perampanel in children, adolescents and young adults with refractory epilepsy: A UK national multicentre study.

PURPOSE: Perampanel is one of the latest antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) approved for the treatment of focal and generalised epilepsy in individuals with epilepsy aged 12 years and older. There is sparse data on the use of Perampanel in children under 12. We conducted a study amongst paediatric neurologists in the United Kingdom to investigate its effectiveness and tolerability as an adjunctive therapy in children of all ages with refractory epilepsy. METHODS: Data was collected via an online questionnaire sent to paediatric neurologists in the UK. Data gathered, prospective in 62 (64.5%) and retrospective in 34 (35.5%) patients, included changes in seizure frequency from baseline and unwanted effects at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up. Only patients with a minimum follow-up of six months were included. RESULTS: Ninety six patients (48 females) with refractory epilepsy from 11 of 29 tertiary centres were included. Median [IQR] (range) age was 14 years 11 months [12 years, 16 years 6 months] (11 months-24 years 5 months). Seventy three (76%) had focal epilepsy, sixteen (17%) generalised, and seven (7%) patients both generalised and focal epilepsy. The responder rate, ≥50% seizure reduction from baseline, was 19% for all seizure types at both 6 and 12 months, 19% and 24% for focal seizures, and 25% and 7% for generalised seizures at these time points respectively. The retention rate was 42% at 12 months. Treatment was discontinued due to unwanted effects in 29 (36.7%) of the 79 patients with follow-up data available up to 12 months: 30% due to challenging behaviour, 14% dizziness, and 7.6% somnolence. CONCLUSION: Perampanel was fairly effective in a heterogeneous group of 96 children and adolescents with very refractory epilepsy. The rate of adverse events leading to discontinuation was considerable in this group.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease 1A with superimposed inflammatory polyneuropathy in children.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is genetically heterogeneous and subdivided into demyelinating (CMT 1) and axonal (CMT 2) types based on neurophysiology findings. CMT1A, the commonest form associated with duplication of the PMP22 segment on chromosome 17p, often arises in childhood but is generally a slowly progressive disease. We report 2 children presenting with clinical features of an acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) who were subsequently diagnosed with underlying CMT1A. Both children had neurophysiology and histopathology features consistent with CMT1. Immunoglobulin treatment was initiated considering the evidence of superimposed inflammation and appeared to modify disease progression. Our findings indicate that CMT1A predisposes to a superimposed inflammatory neuropathy. Recognition of this association is difficult, particularly in children without clear family history, but of great importance as immunomodulatory treatment may improve outcome. In addition, we postulate that an underlying genetic polyneuropathy should be suspected if the recovery from AIDP is slower than expected, or incomplete.