[Coronary artery fistulas, a current problem: Clinical and therapeutic considerations]. / Les fistules coronaires, un problème d'actualité : approche clinique et considérations thérapeutiques.

The coronary fistula is a link between one or more of the coronary arteries and cardiac cavity or great vessel. The exact occurrence is unknown. The majority of these fistulas are congenital in origin. However, they may occasionally be detected after cardiac surgery. For a long time, fistulas are asymptomatic, especially if they are small; the frequency of the symptoms and especially the complications rise with age. The potential complications are: cardiac failure, endocarditis, endarteritis, atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias, rupture, and thrombosis. The main differential diagnosis is patent arterial duct, while other congenital arteriovenous shunts need to be excluded. Even though echocardiography Doppler can help to differentiate shunts, the coronary angiography remains the main diagnostic tool for the description of the anatomy. For a long time, the surgery was the only therapeutic means, up till now, percutaneous occlusion is the first line therapy of coronary fistulas and that the different devices can be tailored to meet different anatomic and functional characteristics.

Endothelin-1 in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing cardiac catheterization.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the possible association between endothelin and coronary atherosclerosis and evaluated the synthesis and release of endothelin in the presence of various stimuli that occur during cardiac catheterization. BACKGROUND: Circulating endothelin has been reported to be increased in diffuse atherosclerosis and acute myocardial infarction. However, the relation between coronary artery disease and endothelin release remains unclear. METHODS: We measured the plasma and urinary concentrations of endothelin immunoreactivity in 45 patients and 10 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: In group IA (n = 9), simultaneous blood sampling in the coronary sinus and femoral artery during coronary angioplasty of the left anterior descending coronary artery demonstrated no immediate changes in plasma immunoreactive endothelin-1 (ir-ET-1) levels. In 11 patients in group IB undergoing coronary angioplasty of a major artery, we did not detect changes in peripheral plasma concentrations of ir-ET-1 within 24 h, but urinary ir-ET-1 levels increased from 9.2 +/- 2.3 to 18.6 +/- 4.9 pg/mg of creatinine a few hours after coronary angioplasty (mean +/- SEM, p < 0.05). This increase in urinary endothelin excretion persisted 24 h later. Group II patients (n = 12) had coronary angiography without coronary angioplasty. Levels of both plasma and urinary ir-ET-1 did not change during the 24-h follow-up period. There was no relation between the severity of coronary atherosclerosis and the plasma or urinary concentrations of ir-ET-1. Systolic aortic pressure correlated with basal urinary excretion of endothelin (r = 0.54, p = 0.03, n = 15). In group III (n = 13), levels of ir-ET-1 in patients undergoing right heart catheterization without angiography did not differ from those in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The presence or the severity, or both, of coronary atherosclerosis is not associated with a detectable increase in endothelin release. The diagnostic procedures of catheterization do not modify endothelin concentrations in plasma and urine. Vascular stretch or injury, or both, during coronary angioplasty increases urinary ir-ET-1 levels a few hours after the procedure. This increase persists for at least 24 h but is not detectable by brief sampling of peripheral or coronary sinus blood.

Coronary angioplasty in patients 75 years and older; comparison with coronary bypass surgery.

From November 1988 to May 1992, 108 patients (79 men, 29 women) 75 years or older (mean 78 +/- 3, range 75-90 years) underwent coronary angioplasty (group I: n = 62) or coronary bypass surgery (group II: n = 46). Group II patients were younger (76 +/- 2 vs 79 +/- 4, P = 0.002) and had a higher proportion of multivessel disease. The two groups were comparable with regard to the presence of unstable angina, left ventricular ejection fraction and Q wave infarction. In-hospital mortality was similar in the two groups (6.4% vs 4.3%). Complete revascularization (72% vs 47%, P < 0.05) and left anterior descending artery revascularization (100% vs 45%, P < 0.01) were more frequent in group II. Two-year infarction-free survival was similar (group I: 76 +/- 6%; group II: 79 +/- 6%) but recurrent class III or IV angina (36% vs 9%, P < 0.05) and repeat procedures (26% vs 0%, P < 0.05) were more frequent in group I.