Liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases involving the caudate lobe.

BACKGROUND: Up to 5 per cent of liver resections for colorectal cancer metastases involve the caudate lobe, with cancer-involved resection margins of over 50 per cent being reported following caudate lobe resection. METHODS: Outcomes of consecutive liver resections for colorectal metastases involving the caudate lobe between 1996 and 2009 were reviewed retrospectively, and compared with those after liver surgery without caudate resection. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent caudate and 432 non-caudate liver resection. Caudate resection was commonly performed as part of extended resection. There were no differences in operative complications (24 versus 21·1 per cent; P = 0·727) or blood loss (median 300 versus 250 ml; P = 0·234). The operating time was longer for caudate resection (median 283 versus 227 min; P = 0·024). Tumour size was larger in the caudate group (median 40 versus 27 mm; P = 0·018). Resection margins were smaller when the caudate lobe was involved by tumour, than in resections including tumour-free caudate or non-caudate resection; however, there was no difference in the proportion of completely excised tumours between caudate and non-caudate resections (96 versus 96·1 per cent; P = 0·990). One-year overall survival rates were 90 and 89·3 per cent respectively (P = 0·960), with 1-year recurrence-free survival rates of 62 and 71·2 per cent (P = 0·340). CONCLUSION: Caudate lobe surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases does not increase the incidence of resection margin involvement, although when the caudate lobe contains metastases the margins are significantly closer than in other resections.

Remote superficial femoral endarterectomy: Long-term results.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine long-term results following successful remote superficial femoral endarterectomy (RSFE). METHODS: RSFE is a minimally invasive technique of revascularising the superficial femoral artery. A single incision was made over the origin of the superficial femoral artery. The endarterectomy was carried out in a closed fashion from above. The cut end of distal atheroma was secured with a stent. Following RSFE patients were followed up with intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IVDSA) and 3-monthly duplex scans. IVDSA was repeated if any abnormality was found. RESULTS: RSFE was attempted on 30 patients with 33 symptomatic legs to treat tissue loss (n = 3), rest pain (n = 3) or intermittent claudication (n = 27). In 26 limbs it was possible to complete the RSFE satisfactorily (technical success 79%), but during follow-up 18 later developed stenoses. Of 31 stenoses detected, 27 were treated by angioplasty. Primary patency at 1, 2 and 5 years was 38, 31 and 16%, respectively. Primary-assisted patency at 1, 2 and 5 years was 77, 65 and 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Primary-assisted patency following RSFE is reasonable, however, it is only achieved with life-long surveillance and intervention. Until results can be improved the widespread use of RSFE cannot be recommended.

Preoperative duplex on admission prevents unnecessary carotid surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Our unit policy is to duplex on admission all patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy to confirm patency. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether this had led to avoidance of unnecessary carotid surgery in a significant number of patients. METHODS: Over a 7-year period from January 1997 to December 2003, a total of 475 patients were scheduled for carotid endarterectomy. Of these, 439 patients subsequently underwent carotid endarterectomy. These data were obtained from prospectively collected vascular departmental records and we also hand searched notes of the 36 cancelled patients. RESULTS: There were a total of 36 cancellations for various reasons. Of these, 8 were clearly occluded on duplex. A further 16 were highly suspicious of occlusion on duplex and thus surgery was deferred and selective angiography was undertaken. Of these 9 were confirmed to be occluded on angiogram and a further 4 had severe stenoses or virtual occlusion, 3 patients had a distal internal carotid artery occlusion. Thus a total of 24 patients had an occlusion either diagnosed directly on duplex or because of suspicion on duplex. Unnecessary carotid surgery was avoided in 24 of 475 (5%) of patients. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a preoperative duplex on admission for surgery results in 1 of 20 patients avoiding unnecessary carotid surgery.